• commentary
  • THURSDAY OCTOBER 4 2007 12:00 AM

You're Doing It Wrong, Baby



When I woke up this morning, I thought, "You know, Fluxy, what the world really needs is another article on parenting written by a childless young person." I'm not one to deny The World, so let's hope I don't step on too many toes with this.

A few months back, some of you might remember hearing about a study showing that Baby Einstein and similar media oriented toward smartifying Very Small Persons did, well, the opposite, reducing language skills by about 10%. It's surprising, you know, since we all know that watching TV makes adults much more intelligent than any other activity. But apparently it's so potentially stunting of little minds that the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends against children two and under watching any television at all.

Baby Einstein's response?

...The Baby Einstein Company is aware of the ongoing discussions regarding children and television viewing, particularly as it pertains to infants under the age of two years old. And, while we respect the American Academy of Pediatrics, we do not believe that their recommendation of no television for children under the age of two reflects the reality of today’s parents, families and households – for example, a recent Kaiser Family Foundation study found that 68% of all babies under two years old watch screen media on any given day. The Baby Einstein Company believes that when used properly, developmentally-appropriate video content can be a useful tool for parents and little ones to enjoy together.


Really, you guys? You're using the "but, moooooom, everybody's doing it!" defense?

But perhaps we are being too judgmental of the Baby Einstein™ subsidiary of Disney™. What do those nasty academics poo-pooing the trend of video parenting suggest? Well, interacting and talking with your baby. This is, of course, absurd, as we all know that discussion with our elders only makes us stupid and weak. That's why college is for chumps.

And now, also, apparently, blocks.

I always thought that building blocks were kind of dorky, but the Seattle Children's Hospital Research Institute has found a correlation between stacking blocks and early language skills. Apparently brand names and fancy marketing have no effect on childhood intelligence and happiness. All those pushing Bugaboos and other frou-frou items of the Pants-Pissing Elite may now commence crying into their Cheerios.

Of course, I am not (yet) a mom, and it's a hell of a lot easier for me to say that the Very Small shouldn't be parked in front of the TV, that you should be engaging your kids in age-appropriate, thought-provoking conversation and the building of tiny castles out of preciously retro wooden blocks. I try not to be too much of a sanctimonious mater en potentia.

But convenience culture will be the death of us. Food processed until it contains only the whisper of the essence of life, the triumph of "easy" and "comfortable" over sophistication and self-value, and 68% of parenting through the boob tube? No thanks. I'll be expending some effort.


Flux is actually pretty sanctimonious, but it's not relegated to the subject of children, she promises.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Comments
mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

OCT 04, 2007 10:40 AM

Speaking of learning and PBS... anyone else remember Villa Alegre? My first introduction to Spanish.

SuntLacrimae

SuntLacrimae

Eugene, OR
October 2005

OCT 04, 2007 12:48 PM

"The Baby Einstein Company believes that when used properly, developmentally-appropriate video content can be a useful tool for parents and little ones to enjoy together."

Useful HOW? Not for learning but for "enjoy[ing]." They really can't come up with a good response to that study, can they? "Okay, so it doesn't make your kids smarter like we say it does. Okay, so it does the opposite. But it's USEFUL (for distracting the little monsters while you go make a sammich and talk on the phone) and ENJOYABLE!"

Don't get me wrong; enjoyable is good . . . if you're just marketing the thing as a toy. When you jack up the price and call it an educational aid, though, just FUN doesn't cut it.

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

OCT 04, 2007 12:58 PM

meh. i usually take my daughter out with me to work with my truck or my bike.

Then when things start going wrong and i start cussing at the truck or bike i look at her and say "you should probably be in watching TV"

such a good dad, aren't i?

Admiral_Pants

Admiral_Pants

Austin, TX
May 2004

OCT 04, 2007 01:05 PM

_DictionaryGirl_ said:

Flux said:

J24U said:

_DictionaryGirl_ said:
Statistics like this always make me cringe. They also make me proud of my own mama, who knows how to raise a genius or two. At least when she did park me in front of the TV, it was usually* something awesome like 3-2-1 Contact! Oh man, I miss that show.




Gee, thanks. Totally gonna have the 3-2-1 Contact theme in my head for hours now biggrin



It's the secret and the moment.



Okay, now would I be going totally through the looking glass if I brought up Square One? Because that's the theme I've got in my head now, by way of association. I mean, Mathnet FTW, am I right?

...Right? shocked



The story you are about to hear is a fib. But it's short. The names are made up, but the problems are real.

I think my parents liked watching that show as much as a did. I was under standing orders to find them when it came on.

rasberry_bullet

rasberry_bullet

New Zealand
May 2007

OCT 04, 2007 01:14 PM

I didn't have a TV untill I was 7 however I was taken to the movies every weekend ... Anyhoo I think the effects of not having a TV when i was younger made me much less reliant on the thing for entertainment. When I am bored I don't turn on the television, I read or draw.

If I have children I would keep the TV away until they are a tad older, except I don't think there is anything wrong with cartoons just the ads in between!

Admiral_Pants

Admiral_Pants

Austin, TX
May 2004

OCT 04, 2007 01:20 PM

_DictionaryGirl_ said:
What, are you kidding me? I mean, Mathman was cool and all, but...



"My name is Monday. I'm a mathematician."



Dude, that's Frankly.

_DictionaryGirl_

_DictionaryGirl_

NEWSWIRE

San Diego, CA

OCT 04, 2007 01:50 PM

Admiral_Pants said:

_DictionaryGirl_ said:
What, are you kidding me? I mean, Mathman was cool and all, but...



"My name is Monday. I'm a mathematician."



Dude, that's Frankly.



I know, but I couldn't find any pictures of Monday by herself.

Admiral_Pants

Admiral_Pants

Austin, TX
May 2004

OCT 04, 2007 02:39 PM

_DictionaryGirl_ said:

Admiral_Pants said:

_DictionaryGirl_ said:
What, are you kidding me? I mean, Mathman was cool and all, but...



"My name is Monday. I'm a mathematician."



Dude, that's Frankly.



I know, but I couldn't find any pictures of Monday by herself.



Here's a tiny one:


Also, Mathnets are on the Youtube! I've been watching them for an hour now! Happy day!

Edit: Angle Dance, bitches.



Further edit: I wanted to find the video with Kid 'n' Play but couldn't. frown

DCruz

DCruz

Montreal-nord, QC
November 2006

OCT 04, 2007 02:49 PM

I just happened to be watching on National Geographic, yesterday, a show about babies and their development. Quite interesting to say the least. To see that kids can do so many things and understand their share while being so young (it was about the period from birth to one year old).

Now I was raised with my share of attention, my dad, working the evening shift, would do all sorts of things with me all day. Play with me, we'd look at books and magazines, and yes, we did watch some tv, but it's not like it's all I did. Sure, I loved Sesame Street and The Price Is Right but so what ? I still loved all sorts of the so-called educational stuff. Like Legos, railroad sets that required assembling, and later on I was the geek that loved board games.

If all that made me smarter, I'm not sure, probably, I mean school was almost a joke to me, quite easy... and today I'm the guy that loves watching documentaries, reading about science stuff...

So nope, there's no way that if I had it kid it would spend all day in front of the tv. (S)He'd be a damn smart kid who loves smart stuff.

gutterman

gutterman

Austin, TX
August 2003

OCT 04, 2007 03:38 PM

Oh, Flux!

Brains galore, and good-lookin' as well!

Evilgasm

Evilgasm

Netherlands
April 2007

OCT 04, 2007 04:06 PM

Oh man.... The number of memories that have come flooding back reading this article, and the comments that followed, are almost overwhelming. Everything from Danger Mouse to: "My name is Monday. I'm a mathematician." Ahhh... the memories.

T.V. defined a large portion of my childhood. Though admittedly it was mostly through marketing tie ins. When I was very young (2-8) living in Ireland, we only had 3 T.V. stations to chose from. (I was really jealous of my friend down the street. He had cable: 6 T.V. stations!). I used to watch T.V. only in the mornings. The shows I loved most were He-Man and Transformers (and Bosco for anyone who knows that one). The merchandise from these shows was an even bigger part of my life than T.V. ever could have been. My friends and I spent hours fighting out battles between Autobots, Decepticons and various He-Man figures.

Then I moved to America (ages 8 to 12).... 30 T.V. Stations!! eeek I was glued to it! When I was a "bad boy" My parents used to punish me by sending me outside to play instead of allowing me to stay in and watch T.V. (this is not a joke). I was an addict. And I continued to be one for several years. As a result I was a pretty dorky kid. Seriously, I had the social skills of a brick. It wasn't until my last years of High School that I started watching less T.V. and interacting more with people IRL. Man did my life improve after that! tongue

Looking back on my own life like this, I can see where the dichotomy of the situation lies. In moderation, T.V. proved to be a valuable stimuli for me as a kid. It fueled my imagination, gave me and my friends something to talk about, and allowed my parents some free time in the mornings wink

When taken to excess however it became a problem. Stunting my (social) development and turning me into... well.... a dork.

We live in a media driven society. To totally exclude T.V. (or internet and video games for that matter) from a child's life would be a foolhardy endeavor. It is a fundamental part of the word we now live in, and can be VERY benificial for a developing child. But as the old saying goes: Too much of a good thing can be bad for you. We need to teach our children how to view and deal with the media input they will be getting. We must also however prevent them from becoming overwhelmed by it.

It is a tricky balancing act, being a parent, but no one ever said raising a child was easy. In fact... I believe most people say it is really quite a challenge.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

I don't have any kids. My girlfriend however has a n 8 year old son. She confronted me this morning with the question: "How are you with children?"

Now on the one hand, it gives me a great deal of hope for our relationship that she is thinking this far ahead.

On the other hand it scares the shit out of me..... eeek

But hey... I'm up for a challenge.



End of rant. wink

Bitch_PhD

Bitch_PhD

I'm lost
February 2007

OCT 04, 2007 09:47 PM

The big question here is, how *much* time does that 68% of under-twos spend in front of the tv, and why? Is it mom or dad popping in a Baby Einstein DVD for fifteen minutes so they can take a shower? Is it the kid parked in front of the television for two or three hours in the morning after breakfast so that mom or dad can take a nap after working the graveyard shift? Or is it the kid watching tv all day because mom and dad really just don't know any better? Or is the kid watching tv with the parents, or because the parents are doing so with the kid in the room?

I don't think videos/blocks/talking to kids are mutually exclusive; I surely did the fifteen, thirty minutes of tv thing with mine when he was under two, usually Sesame Street after breakfast while I got dressed. The thing about kids that age is that they can't be trusted not to get in trouble if they're actively playing, so tv is a pretty safe babysitter if you have to be in the other room for a while. But god knows he got a lot of talking to and block play and he's plenty verbal now.

If it's lots of tv watching because mom and/or dad are just exhausted, then that's shitty for the kid, but it isn't lazy parenting. Ditto if they simply don't know any better. There are certainly indifferent parents who park their kids in front of the tv so the kids will leave them the hell alone while they talk on the phone for ages, or piddle about with some hobby, or who themselves watch too much tv and are actively teaching the kids to do the same with them.

But 68% of parents of under twos? That's not lazy. That's something else--most likely a combination of primary caregivers being alone in the house with the kid all day and needing to snatch some down time, or else the working parent conundrum of just seriously being so damn busy and/or tired that you reach for the easy thing more often then you really should. Work hours are much longer now than they were when most of us were kids, you know.

That said, yes: as a culture we pay a lot more attention to providing "stuff" than we do to providing time, and this includes how we raise kids, and I'm definitely pro-the counter-cultural type of parenting.

Clidna

Clidna

Canada
January 2005

OCT 04, 2007 10:06 PM

Oh bullshit... TV is like anything else - moderation is the key. My youngest has no interest in the television whatsoever (unless that damn iPod nano commercial comes on, she loves the song in that one) but eventually, she will want to watch a show or 2. And I will let her. I used to watch Saturday morning cartoons every week, and a show or 2 after school, and I was identified as being gifted. Why? Because it wasn't all I did - I actually enjoyed reading and going outside more. TV was there when there was nothing better to do. My kids regard TV the same way (and the eldest was also identified as being gifted).

I don't think Baby Einstein is any better or worse than anything else on TV... the idea is to not try and get the television set to raise your kids for you!

Metaverse

Metaverse

USA
March 2005

OCT 04, 2007 10:22 PM

I didn't really watch much tv till I was around 4 or 5. I got up on Saturday mornings for Bugs Bunny with my dad. As I got a bit older I used to watch Abbot and Costello movies every Sunday morning. I watched Happy Days and Laverne and Shirley on Tuesday nights, and Barney Miller. Other then that I didn't watch much the rest of the time until I got into Kung Fu theater on Sautrday afternoons!

I started reading books when I was around 10 or 11, not to mention all the comic books I read. I read all kinds of stuff. If I ever have kids of my own, I will do my best to show them how awesome reading is. But I will also do my best to moderate how much tv they watch. TV is not a bad thing provided it is taken in moderation, and it isn't shit tv. It's about being involved with your kids, not enough parents are these days it seems.

Flux

Flux

SUICIDEGIRL

Georgia, USA

OCT 04, 2007 10:30 PM

oyaji said:

Clidna said:
Oh bullshit... TV is like anything else - moderation is the key. My youngest has no interest in the television whatsoever (unless that damn iPod nano commercial comes on, she loves the song in that one) but eventually, she will want to watch a show or 2. And I will let her. I used to watch Saturday morning cartoons every week, and a show or 2 after school, and I was identified as being gifted. Why? Because it wasn't all I did - I actually enjoyed reading and going outside more. TV was there when there was nothing better to do. My kids regard TV the same way (and the eldest was also identified as being gifted).

I don't think Baby Einstein is any better or worse than anything else on TV... the idea is to not try and get the television set to raise your kids for you!



I think you are missing the point. Even in moderation, TV really does not add anything positive for little kids. At best it is relatively benign. At worst it is a mind killer.



I didn't intend such, and I don't think my citations did either. I think that trying to give your child an intellectual head start by parking him in front of Baby Einstein is misguided, but I don't know how much of a "mind killer" it is (besides, we all know that fear is the mind killer).

I can't believe that I am defending TV to you, considering how much more of it you watch than I.

But then again, you suck at Scrabble, so maybe you're right about TV being the mind killer.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next