• news
  • SATURDAY SEPTEMBER 22 2007 4:00 PM

Question Kerry, Get Tasered, Fuck Bush, Lose Advertising Dollars



By now you're probably familiar with the story of the University of Florida student who was tasered during a forum with Sen. John Kerry. In the course of asking Kerry about his membership in Skull and Bones, he was forcibly removed from the microphone and "escorted" to the back of the auditorium, loudly protesting all the while.



As has been noted, neither Kerry nor the majority of the other students participating in the forum did anything to stop this from happening. However, about 2,000 miles away at Colorado State University, students sympathetic to the recently tasered Andrew Meyer published a response, which has left the paper approximately $30,000 poorer in advertising dollars so far.

Colorado State University's student newspaper has lost $30,000 in advertising and had to cut pay and other budgets by 10 percent because of fallout from the use of a four-letter word in an editorial about President Bush, the Coloradoan reported Saturday.

In large type, the editorial included the words "Taser this ... Fuck Bush." The editorial said it had the support of the Collegian's editorial board.

"As local and national media will inevitably jump on this controversy, I strongly urge the university community to try and understand that the intentions of the students on staff, including me, were not to cause harm, but rather to reinforce the importance of free speech at our great institution," Editor-in-Chief J. David McSwane said in a posting on the paper's Web site Friday.

I can understand being up at arms about the Bush administrations "approach" to civil liberties, and I can totally jive with wanting to "make a statement people couldn't ignore," as the paper's Editor-in-Chief says he wanted to do, but "Fuck Bush"? That's not original, intelligent, or creative. How about "Fuck Kerry." That would be more to the point, after all, and your advertisers probably wouldn't have as big a problem with it.

The Collegian, a free publication funded entirely by advertising and published Monday through Friday printed comments, including negative ones on its Web site.

"Like many other comments here, I'm quite ashamed to see the official voice of my alma mater's paper choosing to express itself like this," wrote one commenter under the name Phil Mills. "Regardless of the Editors' opinion of our President, I would have hoped that they could have come up with something more eloquent and reasoned to express that opinion than this... this... bumper sticker."

The fact that Kerry continued to numbly "answer" Meyer's question even as the kid was being tasered and screaming "Help" and "Owwww" in agony is absurd and pathetic. Publishing an editorial response in a college paper that reads "Taser this ... Fuck Bush," is a close second.

Perhaps worst of all are the other students and (presumably) faculty who didn't respond. What would you do in that situation? Stand idly by, or speak up and act out?

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9

 ... 10

Next

Comments
teddy__kgb

teddy__kgb

Albuquerque, NM
February 2007

SEP 23, 2007 01:22 PM

whatever

Necia

Necia

San Francisco, CA
August 2005

SEP 23, 2007 01:30 PM

Rafi said:

Rahodeb said:

As has been noted, neither Kerry nor the majority of the other students participating in the forum did anything to stop this from happening.
on its Web site.



Erm, what? From the story and the video:

'As two officers take Meyer by the arms, Kerry, D-Massachusetts, is heard to say, "That's alright, let me answer his question."

As Kerry tells the audience he will answer the student's "very important question,"'

And Kerry, as the head speaker, is supposed to have done what exactly, beyond telling the guards not taze the student since he'll answer his question? Specifically and pragmatically, what should Kerry's precise course of action have been, and why would 'fuck Kerry' been a cogent response to this course of events?



I as well would like some elaboration on the part of the author of this here newswire article as to just what exactly she would deem a proper reaction on the part of Senator Kerry in this situation.

As it stands, the condemnation of him with no supporting argument (actually, with nothing more than one inaccurate supporting statement--that Kerry "did nothing," which isn't true) just comes off as kind of stupid, to be honest.

masterfrederick

masterfrederick

Beaverton, OR
November 2006

SEP 23, 2007 01:35 PM

KUNGFOO said:

masterfrederick said:

KUNGFOO said:

scotts0 said:
That kid is a pompous dipshit who thought he could say and do whatever he wanted and wanted to use his 20 seconds on the microphone to get some recognition by thinking he could put Kerry on the spot. Not to mention, the video doesn't show what the kid said or asked prior to the Secret Society question. For all we know he could have badgered Kerry about another question and was warned.



That's simply your assumption. There are plenty of videos out there that show the entire incident. Gut feelings are not facts.

And I can honestly say that if I were in that crowd I would be laughing at that kid for a few reasons, one of which being did anyone else notice how quickly he went from being Mr. Cool Guy on Campus to "heelllppp meeeeeee, they're arresting me!!! somebody heeelllpppp meee pllllleeeaaaasseeee!!!!! why won't anyone help meeeee????" If you can't do the time don't do the crime...asshole.



And what crime was that, that he supposed committed?




KUNGFOO said:

My point is: shouldn't the police be the more responsible when reacting to situations like this? How is the use of a tazer in this situation justifiable?





You have clearly not been paying attention. Resisting arrest. 'Nuff said. Yo do that, things get all sparkly, and not in a way you'll enjoy. Or would you prefer a club? Or mace? Or a boot in the face? All of these things were also justifiable possibilities. Thank the powers that be for the little punk's sake that they chose the least injurious method.



Ah, so you're advocating fascism then. Good to know.



How is having at least a fundamental understanding of law enforcement practices advocating fascism?

I would appreciate a clear answer to this, which I doubt I'll get from a man who clearly advocates ignorance and gullibility.

abracadabra

abracadabra

Seattle, WA
April 2004

SEP 23, 2007 03:12 PM

HarManic said:

Subrosa said:

abracadabra said:
Kerry is a piece of shit like the other politicians who pretend to be "for the people" . This is an example of what is to come , when you openly question any policies involving government on any level . How long the public will eat the shit spewed forth out of their mouths is the only question to answer , ie: How long until we are a police state ?



I could not roll my eyes harder at this comment than I am right now without causing irreversible damage to my retinas..



Srsly.

Knee-jerk anarchism is as ridiculous as knee-jerk fascism.

I had no idea that Skull & Bones was a "policy involving government." I thought it was a support group for overprivileged white kids. Is it a secret branch of Americorps?

"what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."



tongue Well , apparently I struck a nerve then ? The truth shall set us free in the end . Deny as long as you want though and keep eating fast food . Go America !

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

SEP 23, 2007 03:54 PM

masterfrederick said:

KUNGFOO said:

masterfrederick said:
You have clearly not been paying attention. Resisting arrest. 'Nuff said. Yo do that, things get all sparkly, and not in a way you'll enjoy. Or would you prefer a club? Or mace? Or a boot in the face? All of these things were also justifiable possibilities. Thank the powers that be for the little punk's sake that they chose the least injurious method.



Ah, so you're advocating fascism then. Good to know.



How is having at least a fundamental understanding of law enforcement practices advocating fascism?



A club, mace and a boot in the face? That's is a fascist idea of law enforcement. That's the type of thing we are trying to prevent here in America. Everybody has rights, including obnoxious kids with conspiracy theories.

I would appreciate a clear answer to this, which I doubt I'll get from a man who clearly advocates ignorance and gullibility.



Well, if we're going to start throwing opinions around; I doubt that idea will appeal to you...

And welcome to the police state.

masterfrederick

masterfrederick

Beaverton, OR
November 2006

SEP 23, 2007 04:08 PM

KUNGFOO said:

masterfrederick said:

KUNGFOO said:

masterfrederick said:
You have clearly not been paying attention. Resisting arrest. 'Nuff said. Yo do that, things get all sparkly, and not in a way you'll enjoy. Or would you prefer a club? Or mace? Or a boot in the face? All of these things were also justifiable possibilities. Thank the powers that be for the little punk's sake that they chose the least injurious method.



Ah, so you're advocating fascism then. Good to know.



How is having at least a fundamental understanding of law enforcement practices advocating fascism?



A club, mace and a boot in the face? That's is a fascist idea of law enforcement. That's the type of thing we are trying to prevent here in America. Everybody has rights, including obnoxious kids with conspiracy theories.

I would appreciate a clear answer to this, which I doubt I'll get from a man who clearly advocates ignorance and gullibility.



Well, if we're going to start throwing opinions around; I doubt that idea will appeal to a fascist like yourself.



Merely listing the other methods of restraint available for use by law enforcement entities is fascist, eh? You're a funny one.

These are all things an officer of the law CAN (and often WILL) do to your dumb ass if you fight back. They are allowed to use whatever means of subdual and restraint will not kill you when you are not a threat to their life, but ARE a threat to their physical safety. If you struggle, you are a threat. They chose the method least likely to do lasting physical damage. Face it already, they were being NICE. They gave him every opportunity to comply. He refused. He kept trying to get away from them, pushing and shoving and flailing. ZAP. Fuck him.

I'd love to zap this asswad again, personally, and record it so I can have it remixed into the next bad techno tune. Know any good DJ's?

Learn the definition of the word before you use it. And...


For the love of God...


Take some fucking law classes already.

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

SEP 23, 2007 04:20 PM

masterfrederick said:

KUNGFOO said:

masterfrederick said:

KUNGFOO said:

masterfrederick said:
You have clearly not been paying attention. Resisting arrest. 'Nuff said. Yo do that, things get all sparkly, and not in a way you'll enjoy. Or would you prefer a club? Or mace? Or a boot in the face? All of these things were also justifiable possibilities. Thank the powers that be for the little punk's sake that they chose the least injurious method.



Ah, so you're advocating fascism then. Good to know.



How is having at least a fundamental understanding of law enforcement practices advocating fascism?



A club, mace and a boot in the face? That's is a fascist idea of law enforcement. That's the type of thing we are trying to prevent here in America. Everybody has rights, including obnoxious kids with conspiracy theories.

I would appreciate a clear answer to this, which I doubt I'll get from a man who clearly advocates ignorance and gullibility.



Well, if we're going to start throwing opinions around; I doubt that idea will appeal to a fascist like yourself.



Merely listing the other methods of restraint available for use by law enforcement entities is fascist, eh? You're a funny one.

These are all things an officer of the law CAN (and often WILL) do to your dumb ass if you fight back. They are allowed to use whatever means of subdual and restraint will not kill you when you are not a threat to their life, but ARE a threat to their physical safety. If you struggle, you are a threat. They chose the method least likely to do lasting physical damage. Face it already, they were being NICE. They gave him every opportunity to comply. He refused. He kept trying to get away from them, pushing and shoving and flailing. ZAP. Fuck him.

I'd love to zap this asswad again, personally, and record it so I can have it remixed into the next bad techno tune. Know any good DJ's?

Learn the definition of the word before you use it. And...


For the love of God...


Take some fucking law classes already.



The kid clearly wasn't a threat, yet you're saying he's lucky they didn't put a "boot in his face", then attempted to backtrack by saying, "I'm just listing the mere possibilities". So fine, you're not advocating fascism, you're just being an apologist for poor police judgement.

Sporky

Sporky

I'm lost
September 2007

SEP 23, 2007 04:23 PM

pyromethious said:
The second I started watching this I smelled 'Conspiracy Theorist Publicity' coming a mile away. Oh and if you watch carefully, you'll note that he told them NOT to tazer him BEFORE they had their hand even near it! Yeah, it was staged(noting that he had his own camera man planted in the audience btw). I'm not saying what the correct answer to his questions were, but his mind was not open for a negative answer either way.


People already noticed the tazer WAY before the "Don't taze me". At least that's what I got. :/

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

SEP 23, 2007 05:21 PM

spinysquid said:
bullshit monologue? thanks, buddy.


You're very welcome. But I'm not your buddy.

any politician worth his salt should have been able to take control of that situation in an instant.


A) No one ever said he was a politician "worth his salt"
B) You are sitting there in your comfortable room in your comfortable chair with your comfortable lack of mental facility and enjoying the benefit of hindsight and perspective. Kerry had none of those things. He was giving a speech and next thing he saw, shit had gotten out of control. He was probably just as confused and startled as anyone else. Now, could he have said something? Absolutely. Should we have expected anyone, let alone him, to do anything? Absolutely not. Would the police have been obligated to do anything at all different if he had spoken up more than he did? Absolutely not. Nothing at all would have changed. Nothing. If you think otherwise, you're dumb.

kerry was the reason the cops were there.


That couldn't be more irrelevant.

he could have easily diverted the situation by suggesting to the guards to deal with the situation quickly and non-violently.


See above.

you grow the fuck up, subrosa.


I know you are but what am I!?!?!?!

the kid was obviously made responsible for his disruptive actions, but everyone involved failed in epic fashion. the irreverent kid failed to make his point, the dipshit cops failed to properly do their jobs and john kerry failed to take control of the forum, even though he was the focus of the room, and the only one in the room with a microphone.


Again, for the ridiculously idiotic: Kerry has NO FUCKING AUTHORITY to tell the police to do ANYTHING. He's just a dude with a microphone. Microphones are not magic instruments that convey legal authority upon the holder. And whether he said something or not, the police were going to continue to do whatever they were going to continue to do because they knew that. If you can't understand that, that's your problem.

masterfrederick

masterfrederick

Beaverton, OR
November 2006

SEP 23, 2007 05:29 PM

KUNGFOO said:

masterfrederick said:

KUNGFOO said:

masterfrederick said:

KUNGFOO said:

masterfrederick said:
You have clearly not been paying attention. Resisting arrest. 'Nuff said. Yo do that, things get all sparkly, and not in a way you'll enjoy. Or would you prefer a club? Or mace? Or a boot in the face? All of these things were also justifiable possibilities. Thank the powers that be for the little punk's sake that they chose the least injurious method.



Ah, so you're advocating fascism then. Good to know.



How is having at least a fundamental understanding of law enforcement practices advocating fascism?



A club, mace and a boot in the face? That's is a fascist idea of law enforcement. That's the type of thing we are trying to prevent here in America. Everybody has rights, including obnoxious kids with conspiracy theories.

I would appreciate a clear answer to this, which I doubt I'll get from a man who clearly advocates ignorance and gullibility.



Well, if we're going to start throwing opinions around; I doubt that idea will appeal to a fascist like yourself.



Merely listing the other methods of restraint available for use by law enforcement entities is fascist, eh? You're a funny one.

These are all things an officer of the law CAN (and often WILL) do to your dumb ass if you fight back. They are allowed to use whatever means of subdual and restraint will not kill you when you are not a threat to their life, but ARE a threat to their physical safety. If you struggle, you are a threat. They chose the method least likely to do lasting physical damage. Face it already, they were being NICE. They gave him every opportunity to comply. He refused. He kept trying to get away from them, pushing and shoving and flailing. ZAP. Fuck him.

I'd love to zap this asswad again, personally, and record it so I can have it remixed into the next bad techno tune. Know any good DJ's?

Learn the definition of the word before you use it. And...


For the love of God...


Take some fucking law classes already.



BAAAAAAAAH!!! BAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!

I'm a sheep with nothing to say!!!



That's about all you got left.

All I did in the first place is list the possibilities, little lamb. There was no backtracking. I simply put it in a context that a cud-grazing little sheep like yourself MIGHT understand, but once again you misinterpret me.

Here:

Try pissing off a cop to the point where they decide you're going with them. Now struggle your ass off. Don't stop, no matter what. Then get back to me on how they handled your dumb ass. And I'll laugh and explain once again that it's STANDARD PROCEDURE.

Have a nice day, little lamb.

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

SEP 23, 2007 05:43 PM

masterfrederick said:
BAAAAAAAAH!!! BAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!

I'm a sheep with nothing to say!!!



Have a nice day, little lamb.



Well, this is what I get for getting into a political debate with a half-assed pirate.

teddy__kgb

teddy__kgb

Albuquerque, NM
February 2007

SEP 23, 2007 05:56 PM

Subrosa said:

spinysquid said:
bullshit monologue? thanks, buddy.


You're very welcome. But I'm not your buddy.

any politician worth his salt should have been able to take control of that situation in an instant.


A) No one ever said he was a politician "worth his salt"
B) You are sitting there in your comfortable room in your comfortable chair with your comfortable lack of mental facility and enjoying the benefit of hindsight and perspective. Kerry had none of those things. He was giving a speech and next thing he saw, shit had gotten out of control. He was probably just as confused and startled as anyone else. Now, could he have said something? Absolutely. Should we have expected anyone, let alone him, to do anything? Absolutely not. Would the police have been obligated to do anything at all different if he had spoken up more than he did? Absolutely not. Nothing at all would have changed. Nothing. If you think otherwise, you're dumb.

kerry was the reason the cops were there.


That couldn't be more irrelevant.

he could have easily diverted the situation by suggesting to the guards to deal with the situation quickly and non-violently.


See above.

you grow the fuck up, subrosa.


I know you are but what am I!?!?!?!

the kid was obviously made responsible for his disruptive actions, but everyone involved failed in epic fashion. the irreverent kid failed to make his point, the dipshit cops failed to properly do their jobs and john kerry failed to take control of the forum, even though he was the focus of the room, and the only one in the room with a microphone.


Again, for the ridiculously idiotic: Kerry has NO FUCKING AUTHORITY to tell the police to do ANYTHING. He's just a dude with a microphone. Microphones are not magic instruments that convey legal authority upon the holder. And whether he said something or not, the police were going to continue to do whatever they were going to continue to do because they knew that. If you can't understand that, that's your problem.



'lack of mental facility', wow. kisses to you, too.

i understand what youre saying about kerry's lack of legal authority. however, politicians exercise authority in legally questionable situations all the time. theyre politicians. i do think kerry would have had input into the situation had he chosen to raise his voice a little. he's not just 'a dude with a micriphone', hes the guest of honor, and the reason everyone is in the room. that automatically gives him some authority, whether its legal or not. i quiver and shudder with horror at the notion that i might be 'dumb' in your eyes, subrosa. it keeps me awake at night.

Scorn

Scorn

Northport, NY
September 2007

SEP 23, 2007 06:00 PM

Man that really sucks. The worst part about it is you can't help the poor guy bc the situation would just get worse for everyone and by struggling he makes it worse for himself.
Kerry wasn't really making much of an attempt to have him released either which was priceless btw.
masterfrederick is correct that it is standard operating procedure but with the amount of officers surrounding meyer, the taser was excessive.

masterfrederick

masterfrederick

Beaverton, OR
November 2006

SEP 23, 2007 06:39 PM

KUNGFOO said:

masterfrederick said:
BAAAAAAAAH!!! BAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!

I'm a sheep with nothing to say!!!



Have a nice day, little lamb.



I still have nothing relevant to say on the issue other than recycling the same Bah-Bah-Baah shit I've already said as further proof of my ignorance, so I guess I'll just insult your picture!




Political debate? Please. Your sense of moral outrage has blinded you, little lamb. Rather than see the issue as it is, and look up a few laws or statutes, you instead resort to middle-school insults. Get back in the flock, before the dog bites you in the ass, little lamb.

asbestosman

asbestosman

Australia
October 2005

SEP 23, 2007 06:50 PM

zoom image

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9

 ... 10

Next