By now you're probably familiar with the story of the University of Florida student who was tasered during a forum with Sen. John Kerry. In the course of asking Kerry about his membership in Skull and Bones, he was forcibly removed from the microphone and "escorted" to the back of the auditorium, loudly protesting all the while.
As has been noted, neither Kerry nor the majority of the other students participating in the forum did anything to stop this from happening. However, about 2,000 miles away at Colorado State University, students sympathetic to the recently tasered Andrew Meyer published a response, which has left the paper approximately $30,000 poorer in advertising dollars so far.
Colorado State University's student newspaper has lost $30,000 in advertising and had to cut pay and other budgets by 10 percent because of fallout from the use of a four-letter word in an editorial about President Bush, the Coloradoan reported Saturday.
In large type, the editorial included the words "Taser this ... Fuck Bush." The editorial said it had the support of the Collegian's editorial board.
"As local and national media will inevitably jump on this controversy, I strongly urge the university community to try and understand that the intentions of the students on staff, including me, were not to cause harm, but rather to reinforce the importance of free speech at our great institution," Editor-in-Chief J. David McSwane said in a posting on the paper's Web site Friday.
I can understand being up at arms about the Bush administrations "approach" to civil liberties, and I can totally jive with wanting to "make a statement people couldn't ignore," as the paper's Editor-in-Chief says he wanted to do, but "Fuck Bush"? That's not original, intelligent, or creative. How about "Fuck Kerry." That would be more to the point, after all, and your advertisers probably wouldn't have as big a problem with it.
The Collegian, a free publication funded entirely by advertising and published Monday through Friday printed comments, including negative ones on its Web site.
"Like many other comments here, I'm quite ashamed to see the official voice of my alma mater's paper choosing to express itself like this," wrote one commenter under the name Phil Mills. "Regardless of the Editors' opinion of our President, I would have hoped that they could have come up with something more eloquent and reasoned to express that opinion than this... this... bumper sticker."
The fact that Kerry continued to numbly "answer" Meyer's question even as the kid was being tasered and screaming "Help" and "Owwww" in agony is absurd and pathetic. Publishing an editorial response in a college paper that reads "Taser this ... Fuck Bush," is a close second.
Perhaps worst of all are the other students and (presumably) faculty who didn't respond. What would you do in that situation? Stand idly by, or speak up and act out?
Did I just hear John Kerry say that guy asked a very pertinent question? I always wanted to know if John Kerry and George Bush were both in the same secret soceity.
I wasn't aware that a person "gives up free speech when enrolling in an educational institution"... thanks for the warning. Should I tell my children if they ask a question the Prof doesn't like, they might be tasered?
Regardless of whether or not it was a set-up, something is wrong when 5 or 6 cops can't pull a guy out of an auditorium without tasering him. And don't give me the "endangering the officers safety" shit - watch the video. Planting your feet to try and stop someone from yanking you out isn't exactly putting anyone in danger.
The thing that frightens me the most is how many people think that what happened is perfectly ok. Maybe the kid was an asshole, douchebag, whatever. Last time I checked, being an asshole/douchebag wasn't illegal, nor a taserable offense.
This is yet another incident that reminds me of how glad I am to be Canadian.
It is safer to question John Kerry then to drive with Ted Kennedy.
or...?
34
_void_
USA
December 2006
SEP 22, 2007 08:52 PM
I really didn't expect to read this thread thinking I'd have anything to comment on ... but at the very least I like to think people occasionally are willing to base their comments on actual facts.
pyromethious said:
The second I started watching this I smelled 'Conspiracy Theorist Publicity' coming a mile away. Oh and if you watch carefully, you'll note that he told them NOT to tazer him BEFORE they had their hand even near it! Yeah, it was staged(noting that he had his own camera man planted in the audience btw). I'm not saying what the correct answer to his questions were, but his mind was not open for a negative answer either way.
Hmm ... puzzling ... I think maybe I must have watched the wrong video. I watched the one below. It's the one I inevitably ended up watching when it became obvious that everyone on earth was supposed to watch one of the taser videos.
~20s: Officer points weapon of some sort at kid while two other officers try to escort him out ... you might be right, maybe its his sidearm, not a taser.
~1m20s: An officer says something about how he's going to taser the kid if he doesn't comply ... maybe he said "laser"?
~1m50s: "Don't tase me, Bro!"
Hmmm ... I guess my time moves in a different direction than yours. Or maybe I just watched a different "don't tase me bro" video than you did of a completely different incident ... who knew there were TWO "don't tase me, bro" videos. ZOMG! It's a coordinated effort across different locations!!!
FINE PRINT: Since no doubt people will be glad to assume I think the kid acted intelligently through the events just because I'm calling out statements about the events that seem to be clearly in contradiction with what I like to call "reality," let me just point out that nothing in what I said above is either approving or disapproving of the actions of the authorities or the dude Bro tased.
I won't comment further ... I don't want to get in the lazyweb's way of figuring this one out.
First of all, I think many of you are underestimating the power of a person who does not want to cooperate. I don't know how many times any of you have had to restrain someone who really, really did not want to be restrained, but it ain't easy. If any of you have watched cops you'll notice that fairly frequently there are several officers with a guy on the ground for a good long time before they actually haul the guy off the ground in cuffs. For the safety of the officers and the crowd the cops couldn't just drag him out unrestrained, thats incredibly bad procedure.
From a officers point of view someone resisting arrest is about a cunts hair from using violence. Say the guys arm was restrained, say the officers grip slipped and the students elbow jacks him in the face. He didn't mean to but he ends up hurting an officer. Unlikely you say. But I say that if you do this kind of shit for a living then your bound to get that elbow eventually and you have every right to minimize that chance given that your methods aren't extreme. I don't think this was extreme, they gave him fair warning and there is evidence that this is actually what the kid wanted to happen. This is why I say it's too close to call unless you were there and able to put yourself in the cops shoes.
Don't give me the Oh Canada crap either, thats a cheap shot in the first place and in the second, what was that about police trying to incite a riot at some protest? Patriotism and nationalism in general are bullshit and cause more problems than they solve.
Clidna said:
I wasn't aware that a person "gives up free speech when enrolling in an educational institution"... thanks for the warning. Should I tell my children if they ask a question the Prof doesn't like, they might be tasered?
Thank you for taking a sentence fragment from all that I said and running amok with it. Much like the actions of the security guards were taken in fragments, edited down to make it ever the more dramatic.
The fact is that you agree to abide by the rules of your educational institution, and UF has rules regarding public speaking, demonstrations and protests, all of which were violated by Andrew Meyer's behavior.
There was a lot going on before the videos you see start, according to police reports and witness statements. They asked him to leave, he refused. They moved to physically remove him, he resisted. He continued to resist even on the ground, and even after he was warned he would be tasered. Gee, you continue your tantrum after that point, guess what? Things get all sparkly, and not in a way you enjoy.
What truly startles me is the sheer number of SHEEP that just glance at the surface and scream "Police Brutality! Witness the oppression inherent in the system!!!"
As much as I agree that many cops believe their actions are above scrutiny, the truth of the matter is that he wasn't "simply flailing his arms around", he was putting up a close quarters fight in a confined space, which is very very dangerous. the cops responded appropriately to the threat he and his actions presented, because he could have hurt more than just some jack-ass campus cop. This is especially true if the police believed that he may have been reaching for their sidearm, or perhaps some unknown weapon on his person.
maybe getting tasered will teach him not to put others at risk solely for the sake of being a jack ass.
Oh come on, some guy flailing his arms is not endangering an officers safety. The worst that could have possibly happened is a little smack in the face, how terrible. That's just stupid. Now, yeah, a lot of this seems fishy, but obviously the reaction to this incident was excessive. The only excuse for tasering anyone is to get them under control if they are a physical threat. Yes, this guy was slightly resisting but not nearly enough to justify tasering. He was not attacking the officers he was just trying to push away. A lot of law enforcement officers these days seem to think that wearing a badge makes their actions above scrutiny. I know this isn't all of them, I have known many very kind police officers, but the problems start when you get these authoritarian douchebags exerting more force than is necessary, as is obviously the case here. Whether the guy was intending to provoke this reaction or not, it's still an overreaction seeing as all they had to do to get him out of there was one officer to each arm and pull him along, end of story.
I'm confused. What is Kerry supposed to do, hurtle over the podium and take on the cops black ninja style? It's not like he was rooting for the police here or anything. He was trying to answer the question and then shit got out of hand. He's not Superman, people.
41
_void_
USA
December 2006
SEP 22, 2007 09:44 PM
Subrosa said:
What is Kerry supposed to do, hurtle over the podium and take on the cops black ninja style?
That's some imagery just waiting for someone talented enough to make it happen.
42
Formus
Milwaukee, WI
May 2007
SEP 22, 2007 09:54 PM
Rahodeb said:
neither Kerry nor the majority of the other students participating in the forum did anything to stop this from happening.
Um....what the fuck was Kerry supposed to do? Run down off the stage and launch himself onto a security guard? What the hell? Kerry seemed genuinely shocked that it was going on, but what the hell is he supposed to do? I mean...seriously! You...what....expect....Kerry to....[/head explodes]
The kid asked a question and got yanked for it. He asked it in a total douchebag asshole fuckhead piece-of-shit way, but he had the right to. Just the same that the paper had the right to print the editorial. It's really a testament to how censorship knows no political boundaries.
Will people stop making it out as if the newspaper lost advertising because they criticized Bush? They lost advertising because they said "Fuck" in a privately funded editorial, and guess what: Advertisers didn't want their name associated with it.
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
... 10
Comments
Reaver
I'm lost
August 2003
SEP 22, 2007 08:19 PM
Clidna
Canada
January 2005
SEP 22, 2007 08:27 PM
ninetysevencents
Rochester, NY
August 2003
SEP 22, 2007 08:31 PM
_void_
USA
December 2006
SEP 22, 2007 08:52 PM
Frenchinhaler
Ames, IA
March 2005
SEP 22, 2007 08:53 PM
_void_
USA
December 2006
SEP 22, 2007 08:54 PM
_void_
USA
December 2006
SEP 22, 2007 08:57 PM
masterfrederick
Beaverton, OR
November 2006
SEP 22, 2007 09:17 PM
ThatTalentedHack
San Antonio, TX
July 2007
SEP 22, 2007 09:27 PM
Subrosa
San Francisco, CA
July 2004
SEP 22, 2007 09:29 PM
_void_
USA
December 2006
SEP 22, 2007 09:44 PM
Formus
Milwaukee, WI
May 2007
SEP 22, 2007 09:54 PM
Heathen_Dave
Birmingham, AL
July 2005
SEP 22, 2007 10:05 PM
Heathen_Dave
Birmingham, AL
July 2005
SEP 22, 2007 10:05 PM
Reaver
I'm lost
August 2003
SEP 22, 2007 10:16 PM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
... 10