- commentary
- THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 20 2007 4:00 PM
Abused? "Just Leave."
Submitted by Bitch_PhD
Edited by erin_broadley
Tags: abuse, domestic violence

Y'all may or may not have seen the video that's making the rounds of the feminist blogs (I think it started at Echidne's place). It's a recording, by a 13-year-old kid (!) of his father emotionally and physically abusing his mother. Apparently the kid filmed it at the father's command.
I do NOT recommend watching it; it's absolutely awful.
Since I think no one should watch this horrific thing, I don't propose to talk about the content of it here. What I do want to talk about is one way people often talk about domestic violence. Both anti-dv activists and casual commenters about dv cases will often say, flat out, that the victim (usually a woman) "should just leave." (See the comments at the end of the YouTube link, for instance.)
In fact, just the other day I was in a restaurant with my son and for god only knows what reason they had Dr. Phil playing on the television. And the show was about a woman who was abused, and who had a small child (also abused), and Dr. Phil lit into her for not protecting her kid--she should "just leave."
Ugh. Here's my six-year old kid watching it, and asking me questions.
"I hate Dr. Phil," I tell him. "I wish they'd turn this off."
"Why?" he asks. "What are they talking about?"
"Um. Well, this woman is married to a man who is mean to her. And he's mean to their kid. And Dr. Phil is yelling at the woman for being a bad mother because she doesn't leave the man and take her child."
"But shouldn't she? If he's mean to them?"
"Well, yes, she should. But it's not that easy, and it's not her fault that the man is mean to them. Dr. Phil is blaming her when the person who is being mean is her husband, not her."
"Why isn't it that easy?"
"Well, let's see if I can explain. When you're married to someone, it's a legal agreement, right? And they have a kid, right?"
"Yeah..."
"So, it's hard to break a legal agreement, first of all. Second of all, where could she go? Say she goes to stay with her mama. What if that makes the man really angry, and he comes after her, and hurts her even worse? What if she feels like even though the man is mean to his kid sometimes, there are other ways he's a good papa? What if she feels like, because he is so mean to her, it's kind of her fault, so she's too embarrassed to try to get help?"
"She looks really embarrassed and sad on that show. Dr. Phil does seem to be kind of being mean to her."
"Yeah. You know how it is: if someone yells at you, then you feel even worse if someone else yells at you. What she needs is for Dr. Phil or someone to tell her, not that she's a bad mama, but that she's a good person who shouldn't be treated that way. They should offer to help her, not scold her because someone else is mean to her and her kid."
Now, if I can explain this to a little boy of six, you'd think more adults would get it. Jill of Feministe explains it better than I did (would that my kid could just read blogs, sometimes). Appropriately, since she's writing for grownups, she doesn't pull as many punches as I did in my explanation to my son.
So why do women put up with this? Why dont women leave? Are we stupid? Masochistic?
Were rational. As the woman on the video says, physical abuse doesnt start on the first date. Its incorporated into a relationship after bonds are forged and hard-to-break ties are made. Look at this womans life: When he husband started beating her up, she lived with him in a small-ish town close to her family and they had three kids together.
Look at your own life: Could you pick up and disappear tomorrow? I certainly couldnt.
Women who live in abusive households know that attempts to leave threaten their lives. Too often, women who try to leave abusive partners get killed. Their kids get injured or killed. The people or things they love (pets, etc) get injured or killed in retribution.
Beyond that, abusers often control the familys finances leaving isnt free, and if you have little or no access to money, you have a problem. If you have kids, child custody laws kick in you cant just take the kids and run, you have to battle it out in court (which, if you hire a lawyer, also isnt free). If you have a job, your employer may not want to put up with the routine absences that come with messy divorces and custody battles. Your employer may not want to put up with your partner calling and harassing them in an effort to find you. Your friends and family may not want to put up with that.
....
Im a young, single woman whose permanent residence is in New York. I have hundreds of thousands of dollars in student loans. I go to school. Once I finish school, Ill be working, and Im expected to show up. I have to take the bar exam to practice in New York, and Ill have to re-take it before I can practice anywhere else. Ill have a solid $1,000 a month in loans to pay off once I graduate. My name is on a lease. I am close with my family. I am close with my friends. I have an apartment full of stuff.
I cannot disappear.
And yet thats what we expect of women who live through intimate partner abuse. We expect them to just
leave. We act like its easy to pick up and move to a shelter as if its no big thing to leave your job, your family, your kids, your home, your pets, your financial obligations, your professional goals, everything you own, everything youve worked for. We act like women who are abused will have their own bank accounts, their own credit cards, their own transportation, their own support systems, all independent from their partner. We act like leaving your entire life behind is even conceivable.
Interestingly--and ahem, sexistly (I know that's not a word)--in most states that have duty to retreat laws, the duty to retreat--that is, to give ground to an aggressive or threatening person rather than to fight back with deadly force--does not apply in one's own home. If someone breaks into your home, and you have reason to be afraid of them, then you are within your legal rights if you shoot them. I would wager that to most of us, this seems quite reasonable.
Unless you're a victim of domestic violence and the person who is threatening you is your partner. In which case the duty to retreat is yours: you are legally required, most of the time, to leave your own home rather than to fight back against a threat, even a possibly lethal one. Arguing against this law by invoking "battered woman syndrome" requires one to argue, not simply that it was my house, dammit, I have a right to feel safe there, I have a right to defend my person and property; it requires you to argue that you are essentially crazy--that you have some kind of medical mental condition that caused you to act irrationally. In other words, that there's something wrong with you--not the abuser.
Even the law amounts to, "just leave."
But god knows, Jill is right: it is not that easy. One of the things that kind of took me up short after my son was born was realizing that I had a lot less freedom than I had before--not from him (though that's a stumper, as well), but from my husband. Who I love and adore and who would never hurt me, yadda yadda--but if he did, how the fuck would I just walk? I'd have to take diapers. I wouldn't want to take my son to a shelter! I'd have to pack clothes for him, and some toys! Now that he's older, I could lose the diapers, but I'd have to explain to him what was happening--and like all kids, he'd want to know what we were going to do next, what was going to happen. How the hell would I explain that? How could I possibly find us a place to live, how could I even get us across town, without a job and money of my own? How would I get my hands on my paychecks, which are mailed to my house?
Like I say, none of this is going to happen to me. Thank god. But like Jill says,
I will be Goddamned if I ever look at anyone else and wonder why she made such a bad decision.
Bitch_PhD heard just yesterday from P., a college friend--a former colleague and friend of P's was shot over the weekend by her ex-husband, against whom she had a restraining order, in front of their two young children, when he came to pick them up for a supervised visitation. My friend, whose children are the same age, went to her dead friend's memorial service last night.




PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
... 7
Comments
Formus
Milwaukee, WI
May 2007
SEP 20, 2007 04:08 PM
Valeyard
Shreveport, LA
January 2005
SEP 20, 2007 04:12 PM
Bitch_PhD
I'm lost
February 2007
SEP 20, 2007 04:24 PM
erin_broadley
Los Angeles, CA
October 2006
SEP 20, 2007 04:25 PM
Valeyard
Shreveport, LA
January 2005
SEP 20, 2007 04:27 PM
shapeshifter23
San Francisco, CA
September 2005
SEP 20, 2007 04:29 PM
Chriztian
Tallahassee, FL
September 2004
SEP 20, 2007 04:33 PM
Valeyard
Shreveport, LA
January 2005
SEP 20, 2007 04:40 PM
teddy__kgb
Albuquerque, NM
February 2007
SEP 20, 2007 04:40 PM
Asael
Hudson Falls, NY
May 2005
SEP 20, 2007 04:43 PM
wheezy_e
Boulder City, NV
April 2004
SEP 20, 2007 04:44 PM
Morgan
SUICIDEGIRL
Illinois, USA
SEP 20, 2007 04:52 PM
larose404
Columbia, SC
January 2004
SEP 20, 2007 04:53 PM
Gillionaire
Manchester, NH
February 2007
SEP 20, 2007 04:54 PM
Morgan
SUICIDEGIRL
Illinois, USA
SEP 20, 2007 04:54 PM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
... 7