A group of New Zealand vegans are taking their dietary choices to bed. In a brand-spanking new phenomenon being called "vegansexuality," some animal-friendly Kiwis are choosing "not to be sexually intimate with non-vegan partners whose bodies, they say, are made up of dead animals."
One vegan respondent from Christchurch said: "I believe we are what we consume, so I really struggle with bodily fluids, especially sexually."
Another Christchurch vegan said she found non-vegans attractive, but would not want to be physically close to them.
"I would not want to be intimate with someone whose body is literally made up from the bodies of others who have died for their sustenance," she said.
Okay, hang on just a minute, here. I'm a strict vegetarian—a vegan, for all intents and purposes (any animal products that make their way into my diet do so accidentally, at this point), and while I'm not too keen on swapping saliva with my boyfriend just after he's eaten a big, juicy burger, I find this vegansexuality thing to be verging on the absurd. Unless these vegansexuals are engaging in some kind of cannibalistic, Praying Mantis-inspired sex, I don't really see what the problem is. You're not eating your partner, are you? You're not wearing a jacket or a pair of shoes made out of your partner, right?
The revelation of this new little movement came through the research of Annie Potts, co-director of the New Zealand Centre for Human and Animal Studies at Canterbury University.
Cruelty-Free Consumption in New Zealand: A National Report on the Perspectives and Experiences of Vegetarians and other Ethical Consumers asked 157 people nationwide about everything from battery chickens to sexual preferences.
Many female respondents described being attracted to people who ate meat, but said they did not want to have sex with meat-eaters because their bodies were made up of animal carcasses.
"It's a whole new thing – I have not come across it before," said Potts.
Their bodies are made up of animal carcasses? That's just ridiculous. While I can understand being hesitant about romantic involvement with a meat-eater due to potential health issues like heart disease, hypertension, and colon cancer, viewing their bodies as "made up of animal carcasses" is taking it a bit far. I picture a zombie-like creature with a ham hock for a heart and chickens feet for eyes.
"When you are vegan or vegetarian, you are very aware that when people eat a meaty diet, they are kind of a graveyard for animals," she said.
"Sorry, I don't do the hot beef injection, but I do give great cabbage head."
apesamongus said:
"I would not want to be intimate with someone whose body is literally made up from the bodies of others who have died for their sustenance," she said.
Either she doesn't know what "literally" means or she's really confused about how digestion works.
yeah, i'm thinking they may need some remedial chem/bio classes.
Lucy said:
I wouldn't want to sleep with anyone that militant anyway. Militants are terrible lovers.
Hehe, they'd be all intense, but in all the wrong ways. Really structured and mechanic the whole time, thrusting away with the timing of a metronome, screaming out patriotic/self-righteous slogans the whole time. Horrible.
s5 said:
yay, more media coverage that shows vegans as "extreme" or "crazy" or "terrorists". I guess the knuckle-dragging right wing started running out of people who would lap up their gay hating hot air, so next up, vegans.
Vestril said:
A lot of people worship a corpse nailed to a stick, so I guess I can't find it in me to be bothered overmuch by these peoples wacky ideas.
Actually, it's someone that's human yet Divine that rose from the Dead after being nailed to a stick that is worshipped.
Hope that makes it easier to accept.
Dude I've spent time in Catholic churches, it's a bunch of people kneeling in front of and praying to an effigy of a corpse nailed to a stick. Gussy it up however you like, but that's all I can see.
I forgot about the Catholic crucifix.
Although my comment was joking - hence the smiley and my implying that my scenario makes no more sense to nonbeilievers - I was raised Baptist and decades ago taught Vacation Bible School, and they, like other Protestant denominations, have no crucifix and instead focus on the resurrection. I was by no means whatsoEVER gussying up ANYthing - only the Catholic church worships the crucified body of Jesus, but what I was going for was that worshipping the Resurrected Christ also makes no sense to anyone who is not of that Faith. Or to those formerly of that faith.
I swear I wasn't going for a theological debate; my first comment was just something that cracked me up when I thought about it. I mean the article is supposed to make me think these people are ridiculous, but they aren't more ridiculous than a lot of people out there.
You just gave me another opportunity to make fun of the catholics and I went right for it
Which fits right in with my thoughts. When you brought up the corpsickle thing it gave me a chance to joke at my fundamentalist family's expense.
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
... 17
Comments
Cassiel
Aurora, CO
September 2004
AUG 01, 2007 06:21 PM
imclever
Kent, WA
February 2007
AUG 01, 2007 06:22 PM
Necia
San Francisco, CA
August 2005
AUG 01, 2007 06:23 PM
ckdexterhaven
USA
December 2005
AUG 01, 2007 06:23 PM
d20
San Francisco, CA
September 2003
AUG 01, 2007 06:25 PM
PedroNZ
I'm lost
December 2005
AUG 01, 2007 06:32 PM
KGJohnson
Las Vegas, NV
October 2005
AUG 01, 2007 06:36 PM
Skywisdom
Portland, OR
December 2005
AUG 01, 2007 06:37 PM
Dimmi
SUICIDEGIRL
California, USA
AUG 01, 2007 06:39 PM
drewcifer
Portland, OR
March 2003
AUG 01, 2007 06:56 PM
SocietysPliers
Ocala, FL
October 2004
AUG 01, 2007 06:58 PM
910dohead
Palm Springs, CA
September 2002
AUG 01, 2007 07:01 PM
stluv1
Minneapolis, MN
December 2002
AUG 01, 2007 07:01 PM
imclever
Kent, WA
February 2007
AUG 01, 2007 07:02 PM
SocietysPliers
Ocala, FL
October 2004
AUG 01, 2007 07:03 PM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
... 17