• news
  • SUNDAY JULY 22 2007 4:00 PM

My City is Better Than Yours, Fuckheads!



I live in San Francisco. The vast majority of you idiots reading this do not. My city is better than yours. Period. No argument.

Now, I’m not simply throwing this out there willy-nilly. Sure, everyone thinks their city is the best (except for those of you living in Fresno or Denver or something) but I have actual proof. And I’m not even talking about proof in the our-weather-is-better kind of way or the have-you-seen-our-views!? kind of way. I’m talking about actual scientific proof.

F’reals, assholes.

Richard Florida, a professor from George Mason University and author of the book The Rise of the Creative Class argued that the more "gay-friendly" a city is, the more economically prosperous it will be.

In his March 2007 paper "There Goes the Neighborhood," Florida uses something he calls the "Bohemian-Gay Index" to demonstrate that "artistic, bohemian, and gay populations" have a "substantial effects on housing values across all permutations of the model and across all region sizes." He also found that more open and "gay-friendly" areas generally support higher income levels.

This morning on CNN's In the Money, Florida argued that educated kids are generally moving to the most "gay-friendly" cities after graduating from college because those cities tend to have the best job markets.


That’s right. I know you’re jealous, but it’s not my fault your cities aren’t as rad as mine. By definition, no city can be more “gay friendly” than San Francisco. Thus, all of the cool people are naturally attracted here. I didn’t look this up or anything, but I’m pretty sure that on a scale of 1-10, San Francisco’s “Bohemian-Gay Index” is going to be approximately a 150. By contrast, I’m figuring that a place like Boston or New York would be like a 17, Houston or Detroit would be a 5 and LA would be about a 2.75 (because if Los Angelenos were creative at all they would surely be able to think of a better place to live than Los Angeles.)

How does this “more gays equals more money” equation work? Well, Professor (and future SF Mayor) Florida has this to say.

"Places that were open to gay and lesbian people were also the kind of places that could attract not only smart young people, but also Indian and Chinese immigrants who come here and start a lot of high tech companies," he said. "They were attracting people across the board, building up a talent base, and then innovating and starting these new enterprises."

Florida said he thinks it is the open mindedness of these cities that has allowed economically successful communities to emerge, rather than prior economic success attracting open minded people.

"Places that a large gay and lesbian community gravitated to, a large group of musicians and other open minded people gravitated to. When these kind of geeky entrepreneurs became important economic growth, those were the places that accepted them, too," he told CNN.


The full story of how much exactly everyone should envy me for my area code’s overwhelming personal, cultural and economic superiority can be found here. In case you’re more of a passive learner, I've included some clips of the good professor explaining things. He yammers on a bit about the power of “creativity” and how that “creativity” leads to greater intelligence, cultural relevance and competitive economic ability, but don’t lose sight of what you should really be taking from his work: that San Franciscans are better than you.


Were you counting how many more times San Francisco (or its surrounding areas) were mentioned vs. how many times any other city was mentioned? Because I was, and it was twice as much as any other city. That makes the Baghdad by the Bay twice as good. It's simple mathematics and everyone else can eat a dick.

I suppose it is also worth discussing his ancillary point, because the idea that artistic and cultural creativity is a strong indicator of economic prosperity makes a lot of sense. Furthermore, the idea that artistically and culturally creative people are attracted to open-minded areas where risk-taking and divergent lifestyles are accepted makes even more sense. What’s more, the numbers seem to bear it out. The areas of the country that are known for fostering an open, creative environment are our current centers of industry. The areas of the country who are not, simply aren’t.

But again, that’s the secondary point. The real lesson to take from this is that the more you other plebes try to make your city like San Francisco, the better off you’ll be. Not just in the intellectual, cultural or existential senses, but in the pocketbook as well. Now get going, kids, and good luck. You’re gonna need it, suckers!


This is the 100th article I have been fortunate enough to write for the SuicideGirls.com Newswire. I’d like to earnestly thank those who have let me write and those who have bothered to read. It’s been a great time, and very rewarding for me. Thanks again, and I’ll see you around.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 23

Next

Comments
joenov15

joenov15

Dallas, TX
December 2005

JUL 22, 2007 04:47 PM

I've been to San Fran. and didn't like it. I guess it's not the best city for everyone!

DeuceLAMF

DeuceLAMF

Austin, TX
April 2005

JUL 22, 2007 04:52 PM

I live in Austin.

I win.

kiss

aldoushuxley

aldoushuxley

USA
November 2005

JUL 22, 2007 04:56 PM

I found this to be interesting yet, a little unsound. As far as job market goes I believe location and population would have a much more substantial effect on a place then how gay friendly it is. For instance the positioning of natural resources always increases jobs. If a place is ripe in oil, timber, coal, fisheries and farming goods it will have a wider job market than a place that doesn't have these things. On top of that another thing to account for is the stage of growth the city is in, is the city rapidly growing or not, this will open huge amounts of construction jobs. Another factor is the debt the city has and it's spending budget, the more in debt a city is the less public programs and projects it can give to the public. This will affect sales tax and property tax as well as trade tax and taxes placed on goods and services. This is why the united states is an idiot in economic policies, because we as a country are more entertainers for the world than anything else. Yes we have substantial goods to offer, but these are quickly falling to the way side as more people are turned off to science and are turned on to entertainment. SF is nice but simply can't beat the beautiful place I come from, actually the entire state of California can't stand up to its beauty. smile

Serial

Serial

SUICIDEGIRL

USA

JUL 22, 2007 04:57 PM

I love living in San Francisco! The Castro is awesome!

Congrats on 100 articles!!!


love... blush blush blush

Deathray67

Deathray67

New York, NY
September 2004

JUL 22, 2007 04:57 PM

San Fran WOULD be cool if it wasn't so goddamned hilly and confusing. You go there, you wind up following Kim Novak around and getting lost in the bay and spending too much $$ on records.

On the other hand, Manhattan, where AH live has currently been overrun by the normies. You heard me. Remember how all of the tourists used to confine themselves to Times Square? (excepting the cool Eurotrash down in Soho, natch) Well now they're everywhere, and prices is high and it's hot and global warming and where I live--The East Village--has become a giant quad for pugnacious NYU co-eds to wobble on their high heels across and Union Square looks like THE WARRIORS ride at Disneyworld, if there was such a thing... and there should! Cause it's ALL OUR TURF!!! Can yooooouuu dig it?

d_day

d_day

San Bernardino, CA
July 2002

JUL 22, 2007 05:00 PM

ThrottleBitch said:
Ha! Seattle takes second. Considering SF and Seattle have the rain/fog thing going is there a relationship between moisture, money, creativity and gay?



How then would one explain Palm Springs?

Saraphine

Saraphine

SUICIDEGIRL

Pennsylvania, USA

JUL 22, 2007 05:05 PM

If only we could figure out how to breed more gays-- MY town could be as wonderful as SF tongue

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

JUL 22, 2007 05:18 PM

smock_b said:
and I care because.....



...you live way too fucking close to Ohio and should do something about that.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

JUL 22, 2007 05:19 PM

Deathray67 said:
San Fran WOULD be cool if it wasn't so goddamned hilly and confusing. You go there, you wind up following Kim Novak around and getting lost in the bay and spending too much $$ on records.



You went to Amoeba, didn't you?

Cozza

Cozza

San Francisco, CA
December 2004

JUL 22, 2007 05:20 PM

Damn, this ruled! I love you more now.

d_day

d_day

San Bernardino, CA
July 2002

JUL 22, 2007 05:21 PM

Subrosa said:

Deathray67 said:
San Fran WOULD be cool if it wasn't so goddamned hilly and confusing. You go there, you wind up following Kim Novak around and getting lost in the bay and spending too much $$ on records.



You went to Amoeba, didn't you?



Don't all roads lead to Amoeba?

aldoushuxley

aldoushuxley

USA
November 2005

JUL 22, 2007 05:22 PM

Ha I checked one of your links and it seems to support my reasoning, Anchorage Alaska is in the number two richest cities spot and what do you know it is my home town.Whats this, it is rated above San Francisco and it is extremely conservative, sad to say my friend your point just doesn't hold up. Once again this is the reason our country is going steadily down the crapper, entertainment versus smart economics.

elysianfielder

elysianfielder

Los Angeles, CA
March 2003

JUL 22, 2007 05:22 PM

You can't have it both ways. The "higher income levels" and "real estate values" cited in the article are the very things that drive OUT the bohemian and artistic communities. And that's exactly what happened to S.F. in the 90's. It became impossible for bands, artists, small theater companies and the like to hack it in a city where it's impossible for a working person to rent an apartment, let alone own a home.

San Francisco hasn't been truly "bohemian" since the 1980s. (Maybe that's why there hasn't been a great SF band since the Dead Kennedys). By the way, the same thing's happening to Manhattan, with Brooklyn not far behind. Let's not confuse "bohemian, artistic, creative, cutting-edge" with "wealthy urban dwellers who know how to pair their wine with their cheese and where to find expensive modernist furntiture."

I've never seen a city so insecure about its image that it has to constantly say it's the 'best place to live on Earth." Even the damn local news station has that as its motto.

It's a pleasant place to live, especially if you like windy, cold summers. But please, get over your yuppie-loving selves.

GRAK

GRAK

Iraq
February 2007

JUL 22, 2007 05:27 PM

I just love CA in general and don't think Santa Barbara is the best place to live but it is definitely not bad!

Adam175

Adam175

Summerstown, ON
April 2006

JUL 22, 2007 05:31 PM

BlueValentine

Austin > San Francisco



Too bad Austin is located in texas.. and Texas sucks ass.

California > Texas therefor San Fran > Austin

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 23

Next