Again...sad, but frightfully true. Hard to say if the Novak club is worse than those they refer to...They may not be that far off in some parts of the country. And at least Repugs are sticking to the fear card! They may well be 19th century fears, but they'll do in a pinch. Speaking of pinching...Makes one pine for the days when good ole boy (segregationist, racist, rapist) Strom would pinch Hillary's behind in the Senate chamber...ahhhhhh. Now we're getting viscious.

Suprised? Anyone? Anyone? No? Ok.

Hm. I thought the other journalist's perception was interesting:

But yes; Novak, for one, is a misogynist. That goes extra to understanding the Plame outing - he didn't like the idea of a woman having a career in the first place; much less in the CIA.

give it another 20 years for all of that generation to die and then the new generation that hasn't been... oh wait ok so there is another generation made to follow them that has been washed just as hardly as these old fucks. Its a cycle and until the majority votes to put them to sleep we just have to deal with rabid old fucks. I mean it would be only kind to old yeller them for the sake of our "democracy".

Gosh, those old white men are right! I should be a welfare baby-mama, cus that would really contribute to our economy and pull my weight around here. Might as well just keep pumpin' 'em out, too, cus lord knows you get bigger and bigger welfare checks the more babies you have!

And if you secretly smother them in their cribs you still get to keep the cash! AWESOME!

I think you actually make more money selling your eggs to couples who WANT rugrats, so while it's really tempting to keep popping out babies once every 9 months, I think I'll settle for pumping myself full of hormones for a month and then having my unwanted eggs surgically removed for $5,000 or more. Ch-ching!

In 30 years, that comment may come back to haunt you...

I though you were going to say " stop arguing and be *re-productive*."

I'll pick the uppity colored folk if pressed for a decision.

I wonder if he's saying the Democrats shouldn't choose an ethnic minority or woman as a candidate, because he knows that Obama and Clinton are the best candidates and would provide the biggest threat to the Republican party. It could be a reverse psychology stunt.

What about uppity colored dames?

Bitch_Phd's post is not divisive. This is preaching to the choir. And Bob Novak didn't out Valerie Plame. Scooter Libby outed Valerie Plame. Novak was merely Scooter's and of course the veep's method of outing.

Well I'm as conservative as they come, educated redneck hillbilly if you will, and I'm voting for the uppity colored. He is the most refreshing voice I have heard in public life in so long I can't remember. He can think on his feet and has no republican threats whatsoever[ I'm sad to say].

haha that should have been the masterful finishing line to that over-obviously stated article...

- Slainte
Wyatt

Well, at least they're not Jews. Or even worse, Ay-rabs!

I think this is really more about the democrats, who pretty much have the election in the bag, having front-runners who are, because of gender and race, likely to be risky. They're breaking the mold, and Novak knows people are often afraid of what they see to be big changes. Novak's said a lot of pretty awful stuff, but this one's not so bad; it's just accepting that there are definitely people in America who would never vote for a woman or a black man, and that by possibly choosing one to run for the oval they're running a risk.

PS - Okay who clicked the "Bob_Novak" link?