• news
  • FRIDAY JULY 13 2007 4:00 PM

Pope Benedict XVI: “One True Faith Are Belong To Us”



Imagine if Dick Cheney had become President right after Ronald Reagan left office, only with more elaborate hats, and you’d have a good idea of the uphill task that faced Pope Benedict XVI when he was tapped to replace one of the most beloved Popes in recent history, John Paul II, back in 2005.

True to the nickname “God’s Rottweiler” he earned back when, as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, he was calling liberation theology “a singular heresy” and declaring that gays possessed an “intrinsic moral evil”, Pope Benedict XVI has decided that the best way to follow in John Paul II’s footsteps is to piss everybody off.

So, who has the Pope managed to offend so far?

First in line to get angry, and stop me if you’ve heard this one before, were Muslims.

Back in September 2006, Pope Benedict XVI thought it’d be a really good idea to make a speech in which he quoted a 14th Century Byzantine emperor:

"Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."


When Muslims around the word expressed their outrage, Pope Benedict XVI claimed that the quote didn’t really express his personal thoughts about Islam, which is somewhat like yelling “Fuck you, you fucking fuck!” at a stranger and then saying they shouldn’t be angry since you were just quoting Blue Velvet.

Next stop on the “Fuck You, I’m The Pope” tour were the Jews.

Recently Pope Benedict XVI gave permission for Catholic churches to resume the use of the old-school Tridentine Mass. Also known as the Latin Mass, use of the Tridentine Mass had been widely restricted as part of the reforms and changes ushered in by the Second Vatican Council (or Vatican II: Electric Boogaloo). While the Pope’s edict relaxing those restrictions was first seen as merely a sop to conservative Catholic groups, Jewish groups pointed out that the modern version of Tridentine Mass, dating back to the mid-1960s, includes a Good Friday prayer for the conversion of Jews to Christianity:

"Let us pray for the Jews, that the face of the Lord our God may shine on them so that they too recognize the redeemer of all, Jesus Christ, our Lord."


The response from the Pope? In a nutshell, “There’s nothing derogatory about that”. To be fair, he’s comparing it to the original 16th Century version:

”Let us pray also for the faithless Jews: that our God and Lord may remove the veil from their hearts; that they also may acknowledge Our Lord Jesus Christ. Let us pray. Almighty and Eternal God, Who dost not exclude from Thy mercy even the faithless Jews: hear our prayers, which we offer for the blindness of that people; that acknowledging the light of Thy Truth, which is Christ, they may be delivered from their darkness.”


So remember, it’s a gesture of ecumenical outreach to pray to God to convert Jews to Christianity, as long as you don’t call them names.

Having angered two out of the three major monotheistic Western religions, Pope Benedict XVI then went for the hat trick and took on other Christians.

To celebrate the Feasts of St. Peter and St. Paul, Pope Benedict XVI revisited an old favorite topic and announced that all Protestant churches really aren’t churches at all because they lack a direct link to the Apostles and thus lack the “means of salvation”. He then gave a reluctant semi-shout out to the Eastern Orthodox Church, claiming that while it did technically count as a church and had “many elements of sanctification and of truth”, it was “wounded” (or “defective”, depending on how you translate your Latin) by not acknowledging the Pope’s authority, only not as "profoundly wounded" as Protestant churches were.

I guess it’s never too late to tell Martin Luther to piss up a rope.

Many observers, Catholic and otherwise, are worried that these are the first steps of Pope Benedict XVI attempting to turn the Catholic dogma clock back a century or two and undoing the reforms of Vatican II, especially when it comes to relations with other religions. Pope Benedict XVI claims that he’s merely clearing up “erroneous or ambiguous” liberal interpretations of Vatican II, and apparently his conservative views have helped increased both donations to the Catholic church and the number of pilgrims visiting the Vatican.

So if you belong to a religious faith that Pope Benedict XVI hasn’t insulted yet, you might want to send him a postcard and remind him.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Comments
JayBugg

JayBugg

Fort George G Meade, MD
February 2006

JUL 14, 2007 01:32 PM

Don't forget us existentialist Pope!!!

spyder13

spyder13

San Francisco, CA
October 2006

JUL 14, 2007 03:01 PM

Considering Bush is trying to "turn the clock back a century or two" why shouldnt the Pope try as well?!?!? Armegeddon is upon us. The end is near!

testykitten

testykitten

Andorra
February 2005

JUL 14, 2007 03:51 PM

phrogg said:
When the Pope makes a pronouncement, whether ex cathedra or off the cuff, its effect is not only among obedient Catholics but on the world political and cultural stage. Scores of his predecessors have insured this to be the case. So when a Pope - notably a Central European one who formerly had even the most tenuous ties to the Nazi movement - tries to turn the clock back to a more comfortable time, i.e., when Catholics didn't need to think for themselves, to revive a liturgy that speaks, in any language, of "the blindness of this (Jewish) race", I believe the most vehement expressions of outrage are entirely appropriate.

John Paul II was, doctrinally, very conservative, but he also had a discernable spirituality and also had some tact and political savvy. People loved him even when he was dangling them over the gaping jaws of hell. But Ratzinger... to counter the claim of one poster, is a brilliant man and a scholar, but seems coldly intellectual and rigid. And the College? They knew exactly who they were electing. His career as theological "hatchet man" was spectacular and very well known. His election, mere months after the Nov. 2004 US tragedy, had me depressed for days.

It's easy for us in the enlightened First World to dismiss the ramblings of a reactionary Pope, but there are 100's of millions of other "obedient Catholics" who are hanging on every word.



very well said.

although i'm doubtful as to how enlightened the first world is.

wottan

wottan

Vancouver, BC
July 2004

JUL 14, 2007 04:06 PM

Well at least he brings something to the table that the Catholic Church has been lacking for so long: Ultra-conservatism.

xxxxxxx

xxxxxxx

Canada
September 2005

JUL 14, 2007 07:56 PM

geo35 said:
So whenever they start declaring the righteousness of their cause again, in whatever forum, maybe you'll understand why some of us rush to man the barricades.



phrogg said:
It's easy for us in the enlightened First World to dismiss the ramblings of a reactionary Pope, but there are 100's of millions of other "obedient Catholics" who are hanging on every word.



To the extent that either of these comments was directed to me, I urge you to note my comment about "blaming a religion for existing" in the first place. I am not excusing the pope one bit. What I'm saying is that I don't think that any religion, given its very nature, has the conceptual resources to advocate pluralism or tolerance. The modern reluctance to burn people at the stake is a purely pragmatic concession. Tolerance and pluralism simply make no sense if you sincerely believe the claims of a religion (most of them, anyway). That is partly why they are so dangerous.

Beatnik

Beatnik

Venice, CA
August 2003

JUL 14, 2007 08:38 PM

Mockingbird

Mockingbird

Chicago, IL
January 2006

JUL 14, 2007 08:43 PM

I miss the old Pope. And I'm not even catholic. Oh JPII... How awesome you were.

aldoushuxley

aldoushuxley

USA
November 2005

JUL 14, 2007 08:50 PM

Beatnik said:



This is classic I am stealing this picture.

Reaver

Reaver

I'm lost
August 2003

JUL 14, 2007 09:31 PM

Maybe he should send a bunch of terrorists out kill, blow up, or terrorize everyone who isn't catholic! Then claim they are not practicing true Catholicism, and do nothing!

Or he could have the Vatican State steal some land and start launching missiles at every around them to stop 'terrorism'.

ahcoldpizza

ahcoldpizza

Mexico
June 2007

JUL 15, 2007 03:20 AM

Baletempest said:

WyattForMayor said:
Gee who would have thought this is what you get when you make a NAZI a pope...



Oh come on, in fairness it works wonders for their PR, after all nothing screams intolerant, hatemongering ignoramuses than electing a member of the Hitler youth as your supreme ruler.




I hope that was sarcasm. If you're actually seriously playing that card as if that was relevant, need I even point out that just about EVERYONE was part of Hitler's Youth?

It'd be like saying "What do you expect blah blah blah he was a soldier in the army!" about someone who was forced to join the army because of a conscription law.

ahcoldpizza

ahcoldpizza

Mexico
June 2007

JUL 15, 2007 03:22 AM

xxxxxxx said:
What would it mean to believe that Catholicism is true, and to be its supreme representative, and not believe, and be willing to say, that it is the one true faith, superior absolutely or at least to some degree, to all other religions?

You can blame a religion for existing, but given that it exists, it makes no sense to blame it for claiming to be uniquely true. This isn't poetry class. This is about the ultimate nature, meaning and purpose of life, the world, soul, eternity, and everything.

If I believed in some religion, I would not feel comforted by its highest officials declining to state categorically that I'd picked the right one.



At last, some intelligence!

dkixk

dkixk

Chicago, IL
September 2003

JUL 15, 2007 07:21 PM

xxxxxxx said:
What would it mean to believe that Catholicism is true, and to be its supreme representative, and not believe, and be willing to say, that it is the one true faith, superior absolutely or at least to some degree, to all other religions?

You can blame a religion for existing, but given that it exists, it makes no sense to blame it for claiming to be uniquely true. This isn't poetry class. This is about the ultimate nature, meaning and purpose of life, the world, soul, eternity, and everything.

If I believed in some religion, I would not feel comforted by its highest officials declining to state categorically that I'd picked the right one.



Do I blame bears for being the blood thirsty killing machines that they are? No. But that doesn't mean that I don't realize that they are our #1 threat. And it certainly does not mean that I'm just going to give them my picnic basket.

stigmatamartyr13

stigmatamartyr13

Indianapolis, IN
February 2007

JUL 15, 2007 07:39 PM

Funny how a man can declare that which only God can decree. Organized religion as a whole has been tainted by the intrinsic evil that resides within every man. Just because a Prophet has a different color skin than you does not mean that his message is any less true.

If the archaic dinosaur that is the Catholic Church were really the "Ideal religion," why is it that they just shelled out $656 Million dollars in California alone to settle sexual abuse cases? What's truly staggering is that they even have that kind of money to begin with. Less staggering but no less concerning is that this was just in one state, there are after all, 49 others in the Union.

Maybe the Pope should try getting hip, and instead of forcing all new conscripts into his "Army of God" into a life of celibacy, offering them the ability to enter into a marriage which is after all the most holy union under God. This would certainly be more productive, and more "Christian" than chastising others for their own beliefs, which are no less meaningful to their followers than his.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next