BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

The toy that changed a generation is now a movie that owes its success to a simple tried and true formula for summer box office gold. Transformers the movie is set to break not only box office records but action figure sales records as well. As of this writing, tracking companies report that 90% of audiences are rating Transformers “Excellent” to “Very Good.” The weekend is not even here, and in a few days, the film has racked up over $84 million. In fact, the only segment of the audience that is the least enthusiastic, according to industry tracking has been, not surprisingly, females 25 and over. But was there any ever doubt that this film was always more of a “guys” movie?


After this summer, kids will be naming their pets "Optimus Prime."

The action director film geeks love to hate, Michael Bay, had a helping hand in crafting the universal storyline from the master of the summer movie epic, Steven Spielberg. Perhaps that’s why the heart and soul of Transformer’s story is rooted in delivering very basic elements that are known to add up to a hit movie. Yet this formula must be so carefully mixed, that even the slightest deviation will lead to disaster.

The formula goes something like this:
Relatable Character with a Simple Goal + Cute Sidekick/Pet
+ Action x Comedy ÷ Universal Themes
x Heroes ÷ Villains
+ The “X” Factor =
Successful Summer Movie


Let me break it down for you.

Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) is the face audience's can identify with.

Relatable Character with a Simple Goal
Shia LeBouf has been called the new “Tom Hanks” but that’s probably a little too soon. Really, he’s just a likable kid. His character’s goal, to get his first car and possibly “talk” to a girl, is incredibly relatable to males of any age. And the way that Shia plays every scene is with that wide-eyed sense of wonder. He’s the character audiences look to when they want to know how to react. His performance grounds the film in a reality that makes the fantastic events believe-able. Sure, sounds simple, and its easy to type that sentence, but not so easy to pull off in a major effects film, see countless examples of duds from previous summers.

Cute Sidekick/Pet
Sam Witwicky has a pet. It’s a cute Chihuahua and it’s name is Mojo. And when it’s bad, he calls him “Bad Mojo.” Mojo has a broken leg. And we feel sorry for it as Sam must administer the tiny dog pain pills. And Mojo pees on a Transformer’s foot. And it’s cute, cute, so cute! In fact, it borders on cute overload but the dog which appears just enough to avoid being annoying.


It's not violence, it's "action."

Action
The film contains 15 action set-pieces, each with their own simply defined goal – get away from the killer alien robot, try not to get killed by the alien robot, run away from the car that might be a killer robot, run away and try to kill the killer robot that is killing everything. In addition, robots fighting just look cool. The only complaint here may be that the action is so fast and furious as to sometimes seem confusing. But it’s robots beating the crap out of each other!


Anthony Anderson on the right, provides plenty of humor, an essential summer movie element.

Comedy
Shia LeBouf’s character Sam Witwicky provides plenty of laughs as a geeky virgin, but Anthony Anderson is the true comedic standout in every scene he’s in. Michael Bay deserves credit for allowing these actors to improvise much of the comedy loosening up the tension normally accompanied by impending doom. Not to mention Bernie Mack’s hilarious scene as a sleazy used car salesman that would be fun to watch in any movie.

Heroes ÷ Villains
There are an abundance of loveable and love-to-hate characters in Transformers, in fact, enough for several sequels, which I’m sure are already in the planning and/or toy design phase. Bumble Bee (that yellow Camaro) is especially filling in as E.T. Optimus Prime’s regal and bad ass manner makes you miss him when he’s not around.

Universal Themes
This is something we call can relate to. And when I say “all” what I mean specifically is the intended demographic for this movie hovering around the 14-15 year-old male or the segment of the population of men who stand firmly in the 14-15 year-old male mindset which, let’s be honest, is a significant part of the male population.


Mikaela (Megan Fox) is the girl in the movie most guys (and girls) would like to...

So, what universal themes are contained in Transformers?
I want a car.
I want my parents to leave me alone.
I want a hot girlfriend.
I want an adventure.
I want my own robot from space to protect me from bullies.
I think we can all relate to these things.


The key element to the success of Transformers is seeing something we've never seen before.

The “X” Factor (Something We’ve Never Seen)
Without the “X” Factor, all the previously mentioned elements mean nothing. This most important part of the formula is usually represented by something new and fresh. It’s something never before seen on a movie screen, but backed up by all the previously mentioned familiar elements.

So, to future summer blockbusters, show us something we’ve seen a million times but show it to us in a way we’ve never seen.

Gore gone.

Chris_Gore no longer collects action figures. He ran out of room.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Twelve

Twelve

Bay City, MI
April 2007

JUL 06, 2007 11:33 PM

deusxmachina said:
I think it's safe to say that anyone who didn't enjoy this movie expected something more than mindless robot eyecandy. Seriously, it's a movie based on a fucking cartoon...I didn't expect to see some Isaac Asimov-ish Optimus Prime battling robot discrimination from humans who refuse to see him as equal.



No, but I've heard this a lot and it's really missing the point that I'm trying to make entirely.

I wanted a big action movie with lots of big transforming robots blowing each other up for two hours. That isn't what the movie delivered.

The fight choreography sucks. Whenever something is interesting the camera cuts to something else, and when you are watching the fighting it's so close-in (or so choppy) that you can't see what's actually going on.

That and there just wasn't enough of that going on.

Evilgasm

Evilgasm

Netherlands
April 2007

JUL 07, 2007 02:39 AM

The film is total crap.

Sure they got a big bad-ass FX budget, but it takes more than pretty pictures to make a good film (even a 2 hour popcorn flick).

The original storyline from the TV series had a LOT of crap in it. It also had a lot o good elements as well. To me it looks like the movies writers reviewed the entire series, cut out all the good bits, and strung together all the crap they could muster in order to make this monstrosity.

Had it been done right this could have been a really great film. Instead it's just shit.

Deflicted

Deflicted

Wichita Falls, TX
July 2006

JUL 07, 2007 04:16 AM

otherwise know as the spiderman formula.................???????????????/

The formula goes something like this:
Relatable Character with a Simple Goal + Cute Sidekick/Pet
+ Action x Comedy ÷ Universal Themes
x Heroes ÷ Villains
+ The "X" Factor =
Successful Summer Movie

Let me break it down for you.

Ravnos

Ravnos

Edmonton, AB
OLD SKOOL

JUL 07, 2007 06:37 AM

deusxmachina said:
I think it's safe to say that anyone who didn't enjoy this movie expected something more than mindless robot eyecandy. Seriously, it's a movie based on a fucking cartoon...I didn't expect to see some Isaac Asimov-ish Optimus Prime battling robot discrimination from humans who refuse to see him as equal.



I bet you think Batman & Robin was a good Batman movie because the old Adam West Batman series was campy, too. And Spider-Man fans shouldn't have had high expectations for Spider-Man 3 because the Spider-man & His Amazing Friends cartoon was so bad, too. Or maybe those raised expectations only matter when the movie is about guys in spandex. I mean, how dare someone expect something resembling a plot or acting when seeing a sci-fi action movie, right?

brett54

brett54

Australia
November 2004

JUL 07, 2007 07:01 AM

... mmm, Transformers
... kids cartoon
... kids toy
... kids movie

My 10, oops, 11 y.o and 12 y.o loved it.

I think your (misguided) film critic 101 analysis missed the classic

filmjedi

filmjedi

Brighton, MA
June 2004

JUL 07, 2007 09:03 AM

its perhaps the worst movie i have ever seen. i can't believe chris gore liked this movie.

darkgodz

darkgodz

Katy, TX
August 2003

JUL 07, 2007 11:31 AM

anyone who didnt like this movie for what it was at its most basic elements is either a super geek original series total fan-boi or is just some one who probably shoulda gone and seen knocked up again.

its an action "superhero" movie with giant robots and a couple of really hawt chicks. whats not to like?

Dizzy

Dizzy

Los Angeles, CA
January 2004

JUL 07, 2007 12:40 PM

Rafi said:

Shalome said:

gdarklighter said:

david said:
And I'm still confused as to why they had to go to downtown LA with the box thingy.



Um, not LA. Nowhere near LA. In fact, it's a four and a half hour drive from Hoover Dam to LA, which would be a pretty stupid strategic choice, even for a Michael Bay film. They went to (the fictional as near as I can tell) Mission City, NV.

Also, an urban environment probably offers more cover than the middle of the desert.



It was downtown LA.

It was shot on the streets around my office in downtown LA. Very recognizaible buildings like One Wilshire and the Orpheum theater are clearly visible. If it wasn't meant to be Downtown LA they probably should have done a better job disguising recognizable landmarks and street names.



They don't care. Recognizable landmarks to regular denizens of any given location are not recognizable - or at least not distracting - to 97% of the rest of the moviegoing public.



Unless of course, they live in LA wink
I think it was the wide sweeping shots of the US bank tower and the Clearly visible street signs in the center to the frames that said yes folks, we are fighting in Downtown LA today. It wasn't that they didn't care.
I'd have to say, having to deal with all of the fucked traffic around the office because of shooting paid off in my mind. At least this once.

Dizzy

Dizzy

Los Angeles, CA
January 2004

JUL 07, 2007 12:42 PM

Evilgasm said:
The film is total crap.

Sure they got a big bad-ass FX budget, but it takes more than pretty pictures to make a good film (even a 2 hour popcorn flick).

The original storyline from the TV series had a LOT of crap in it. It also had a lot o good elements as well. To me it looks like the movies writers reviewed the entire series, cut out all the good bits, and strung together all the crap they could muster in order to make this monstrosity.

Had it been done right this could have been a really great film. Instead it's just shit.



Should we start another group/ thread about the same subject so that you can have yet another place to bitch and moan once again, or are you finally finished?

reprobate

reprobate

New Orleans, LA
December 2002

JUL 07, 2007 12:52 PM

I'm terribly curious as to why there are never articles deconstructing the pure redundant formulae of films like, say, Sideways?

I mean come on, I like pinot noir just as much as anyone, but really, I'm pretty sure I saw that movie just a few fucking times before, and when it was called Swingers they had better locations.

Must be because indie films are art or something.

Dizzy

Dizzy

Los Angeles, CA
January 2004

JUL 07, 2007 12:59 PM

In truth, i too used to line up my Mini Autobot figures and have them re enact scenes from Macbeth. In fact just the other day, i had my Ironhide and Bumblebee toys do the lines from the Sushi bar scenes from Lost in Translation. (Bumblebee was the hottie because he had the rack for it, and Ironhide played the aging actor. Grimlock was a natural as the Japanese sushi chef).

teamgrandma

teamgrandma

Boise, ID
November 2002

JUL 07, 2007 01:15 PM

I was ready to Hate it untill Optimus Spoke... All the things I remember from being a kid watching it came back to me and made it worth seeing. Amazing how a sound can do so many things.

bairdduvessa

bairdduvessa

Centerville, MA
April 2005

JUL 07, 2007 02:40 PM

i loved every second of it

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

JUL 07, 2007 02:42 PM

I was with you until you described a chihuahua as cute. Those words do not belong in the same sentence. Chihuahuas are the most annoying, ugly example of yappy small dog I can think of.

(Well, okay, shih tzus are uglier. But they're not as small or yappy.)

MikeofEvil2

MikeofEvil2

United Kingdom
September 2003

JUL 07, 2007 05:01 PM

It was Buster Witwicky, not Sam. Goddamn it, they can't even get the simple things right! And OK it was a stupid name then and would be now, but still...

(owns the Complete Works Pt 1 and 2, back from when it WAS the Complete Works)

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

PreviousNext

Biden Palin I

Comments 1131 Comments - Last Comment 6 days ago

Enjoying Your Gas Rape?

Comments 275 Comments - Last Comment 2 days ago

McCain: Unstable Lunatic

Comments 244 Comments - Last Comment 5 hours ago

Palin: A Perfect Train Wreck

Comments 191 Comments - Last Comment 6 days ago

McCain: Confused Old Man

Comments 99 Comments - Last Comment 4 days ago

Republican Scumbaggery

Comments 74 Comments - Last Comment 1 day ago

McCain: Unstable Lunatic

Last Comment 5 HR by Quella

McCain: Unstable Lunatic

Last Comment 5 HR

And unbelievably, McCain continues with his inflamatory and bizarrely unprofessional behavior: McCain... More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #67

Last Comment 8 HR

Reading all of that really disturbs me. More ...

The Frankenliberal

Last Comment 16 HR by Pip
Member: Pip

Pip

The Frankenliberal

Last Comment 16 HR

We accept your apology, because so few people have openly repented (stares at John McCain). It's never... More ...

Vampires: State of the Genre Report

Last Comment 10/11/08

It seems like I'm always pimping it, but the Dresden Files has some excellent characterization of vampires. More ...

All Tomorrow's (Pity) Parties

Last Comment 10/11/08 by NoHearts

All Tomorrow's (Pity) Parties

Last Comment 10/11/08

To my knowledge(the only one I know and attended) Chicago got an ATP party basically in a city park. No... More ...

Bush Rapes U.S. Solar Companies

Last Comment 10/11/08

thanks for writing this article. I've referred back to it countless times for arguments on other sites. More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Marty Krofft
SuicideGirls Interview: CSI Franchise creator: Anthony E. Zuiker
SuicideGirls Interview: Lily Tomlin