• commentary
  • FRIDAY JULY 6 2007 12:00 PM

Chris Gore's Footage Fetishes: Transformers' Formula for Success

The toy that changed a generation is now a movie that owes its success to a simple tried and true formula for summer box office gold. Transformers the movie is set to break not only box office records but action figure sales records as well. As of this writing, tracking companies report that 90% of audiences are rating Transformers “Excellent” to “Very Good.” The weekend is not even here, and in a few days, the film has racked up over $84 million. In fact, the only segment of the audience that is the least enthusiastic, according to industry tracking has been, not surprisingly, females 25 and over. But was there any ever doubt that this film was always more of a “guys” movie?


After this summer, kids will be naming their pets "Optimus Prime."

The action director film geeks love to hate, Michael Bay, had a helping hand in crafting the universal storyline from the master of the summer movie epic, Steven Spielberg. Perhaps that’s why the heart and soul of Transformer’s story is rooted in delivering very basic elements that are known to add up to a hit movie. Yet this formula must be so carefully mixed, that even the slightest deviation will lead to disaster.

The formula goes something like this:
Relatable Character with a Simple Goal + Cute Sidekick/Pet
+ Action x Comedy ÷ Universal Themes
x Heroes ÷ Villains
+ The “X” Factor =
Successful Summer Movie


Let me break it down for you.

Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) is the face audience's can identify with.

Relatable Character with a Simple Goal
Shia LeBouf has been called the new “Tom Hanks” but that’s probably a little too soon. Really, he’s just a likable kid. His character’s goal, to get his first car and possibly “talk” to a girl, is incredibly relatable to males of any age. And the way that Shia plays every scene is with that wide-eyed sense of wonder. He’s the character audiences look to when they want to know how to react. His performance grounds the film in a reality that makes the fantastic events believe-able. Sure, sounds simple, and its easy to type that sentence, but not so easy to pull off in a major effects film, see countless examples of duds from previous summers.

Cute Sidekick/Pet
Sam Witwicky has a pet. It’s a cute Chihuahua and it’s name is Mojo. And when it’s bad, he calls him “Bad Mojo.” Mojo has a broken leg. And we feel sorry for it as Sam must administer the tiny dog pain pills. And Mojo pees on a Transformer’s foot. And it’s cute, cute, so cute! In fact, it borders on cute overload but the dog which appears just enough to avoid being annoying.


It's not violence, it's "action."

Action
The film contains 15 action set-pieces, each with their own simply defined goal – get away from the killer alien robot, try not to get killed by the alien robot, run away from the car that might be a killer robot, run away and try to kill the killer robot that is killing everything. In addition, robots fighting just look cool. The only complaint here may be that the action is so fast and furious as to sometimes seem confusing. But it’s robots beating the crap out of each other!


Anthony Anderson on the right, provides plenty of humor, an essential summer movie element.

Comedy
Shia LeBouf’s character Sam Witwicky provides plenty of laughs as a geeky virgin, but Anthony Anderson is the true comedic standout in every scene he’s in. Michael Bay deserves credit for allowing these actors to improvise much of the comedy loosening up the tension normally accompanied by impending doom. Not to mention Bernie Mack’s hilarious scene as a sleazy used car salesman that would be fun to watch in any movie.

Heroes ÷ Villains
There are an abundance of loveable and love-to-hate characters in Transformers, in fact, enough for several sequels, which I’m sure are already in the planning and/or toy design phase. Bumble Bee (that yellow Camaro) is especially filling in as E.T. Optimus Prime’s regal and bad ass manner makes you miss him when he’s not around.

Universal Themes
This is something we call can relate to. And when I say “all” what I mean specifically is the intended demographic for this movie hovering around the 14-15 year-old male or the segment of the population of men who stand firmly in the 14-15 year-old male mindset which, let’s be honest, is a significant part of the male population.


Mikaela (Megan Fox) is the girl in the movie most guys (and girls) would like to...

So, what universal themes are contained in Transformers?
I want a car.
I want my parents to leave me alone.
I want a hot girlfriend.
I want an adventure.
I want my own robot from space to protect me from bullies.
I think we can all relate to these things.


The key element to the success of Transformers is seeing something we've never seen before.

The “X” Factor (Something We’ve Never Seen)
Without the “X” Factor, all the previously mentioned elements mean nothing. This most important part of the formula is usually represented by something new and fresh. It’s something never before seen on a movie screen, but backed up by all the previously mentioned familiar elements.

So, to future summer blockbusters, show us something we’ve seen a million times but show it to us in a way we’ve never seen.

Gore gone.

Chris_Gore no longer collects action figures. He ran out of room.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Comments
deusxmachina

deusxmachina

Honolulu, HI
May 2003

JUL 07, 2007 05:12 PM

Ravnos said:

deusxmachina said:
I think it's safe to say that anyone who didn't enjoy this movie expected something more than mindless robot eyecandy. Seriously, it's a movie based on a fucking cartoon...I didn't expect to see some Isaac Asimov-ish Optimus Prime battling robot discrimination from humans who refuse to see him as equal.



I bet you think Batman & Robin was a good Batman movie because the old Adam West Batman series was campy, too. And Spider-Man fans shouldn't have had high expectations for Spider-Man 3 because the Spider-man & His Amazing Friends cartoon was so bad, too. Or maybe those raised expectations only matter when the movie is about guys in spandex. I mean, how dare someone expect something resembling a plot or acting when seeing a sci-fi action movie, right?




The movie was directed by Michael Bay. And you expected more? It was what it was, I enjoyed it because I didn't have any expectations.

And also, Batman and Spiderman were a little bit more than a Saturday morning cartoon created by toy makers "Hasbro". Seriously.

nothingtonothing

nothingtonothing

San Lorenzo, CA
December 2005

JUL 08, 2007 12:42 AM

I just saw Transformers. It was what it was: a Michael Bay movie. Basically, a spectacular-looking piece of shit. That's okay, though. It's just a reminder to never, ever expect his movies to be good.

Shal

Shal

Los Angeles, CA
October 2002

JUL 08, 2007 02:11 AM

malkav11 said:
I was with you until you described a chihuahua as cute. Those words do not belong in the same sentence. Chihuahuas are the most annoying, ugly example of yappy small dog I can think of.

(Well, okay, shih tzus are uglier. But they're not as small or yappy.)





DISAGREE!



Leroy_Chihuahua, who lives with me and Bean, takes offense at you calling chihuahuas ugly and annoying and yappy. He's just too busy licking his own balls to tell you so.

He also thought Transformers was awesome.

Okay, so he thought peeing on Optimus Prime (who was parked outside the theater; god I love living in Hollywood) was awesome.

I need to get a picture of him doing that.

RudieCantFail

RudieCantFail

Baton Rouge, LA
January 2006

JUL 08, 2007 02:18 AM

malkav11 said:
Chihuahuas are the most annoying, ugly example of yappy small dog I can think of.



You've never encountered a Yorkshire Terrier then, have you?

Shal

Shal

Los Angeles, CA
October 2002

JUL 08, 2007 02:20 AM

reprobate said:
I'm terribly curious as to why there are never articles deconstructing the pure redundant formulae of films like, say, Sideways?

I mean come on, I like pinot noir just as much as anyone, but really, I'm pretty sure I saw that movie just a few fucking times before, and when it was called Swingers they had better locations.

Must be because indie films are art or something.



Personally, i occasionally enjoy setting aside my knowledge of film and art and my personal pretentiousness and, you know, most of my brain... and WATCHING A MOVIE WHERE SHIT BLOWS UP AND GIANT ROBOTS FIGHT OMG OMG SO FUCKING RAD.

Transformers satisfied my need to see giant robots fight and explosions happen. Film lovers can go see something else.

lost_girl

lost_girl

Australia
March 2007

JUL 08, 2007 02:29 AM

i LOVED this movie!
i can't wait for part two!

i love robots so so much!
and shia lebeouf... love ...yum!

Chris_Gore

Chris_Gore

Los Angeles, CA
September 2005

JUL 08, 2007 09:21 AM

reprobate said:
I'm terribly curious as to why there are never articles deconstructing the pure redundant formulae of films like, say, Sideways?



Now that is a great point!

Independent films have become just as formulaic and cliché as their Hollywood counterparts. Thanks for the suggestion and I'll take you up on it for a future piece. Thanks reprobate!

Also, I did address this quite a bit in a film I co-wrote and produced which spoofs indies.

filmjedi

filmjedi

Brighton, MA
June 2004

JUL 08, 2007 03:34 PM

first off, i hated this movie.

i own the criterion edition of armegedon. i also own bad boys and the rock. i enjoy michael bay, the dude knows action flicks.

to this day, i defend movies like the entire matrix trilogy, and the star wars prequels. i love them, i think they are awesome.

transformers sucked hard. why? because when people make movies like this, they add too many humans. it's dumb. i thought john turtoro knew how to read a script, based upon his work with the coens, et al. apparently, he doesnt.

and why was anthony anderson in this movie? hmm...comic relief. he wasn't even that funny.

this is a nerd movie. am i a fanboy from the original series, yes, and michael bay, excuse me fore remembering the storyline. it was basically a tv show where robots fought, with LASERS. why did they have bullets?

why were the humans fighting too, they are ants compared to these alien forms. and how the heck does megatron get frozen. what is that. its stupid is what it is.

this movie could have been awesome. i could have overlooked the redesigns, the changes in the mythology, but i can't overlook two things. the amount of crappy humans in the movie, and the really bad dialogue. "your more then meets the eye", i woulda flunked out of film school for writing that. yay, that was worth the writers, what, 250,000 dollar salary

let's not forget john voight shooting at a transformer with a SHOTGUN in a CASE that RANDOMLY appears, and let's not forget that crappy slow motion shot of a an LA WAIF HOT CHICK as a transformer goes flyin overhead. what was that crap, it was crap, millions of dollars of crap.

jeez, for what this movie cost we could all have universal health care for a few years. movie industry, do that, instead of making a sequel to transformers, piss off our government for a few years, and give us healthcare, that would be amazing.

Chris_Gore

Chris_Gore

Los Angeles, CA
September 2005

JUL 09, 2007 12:30 PM

benhasglasses said:
first off, i hated this movie.

transformers sucked hard. why? because when people make movies like this, they add too many humans. it's dumb. i thought john turtoro knew how to read a script, based upon his work with the coens, et al. apparently, he doesnt.


I think it would be difficult to base an entire movie around robots. As humans we relate to humans and a whole movie with robots talking might as well be a cartoon or CGI movie. Perhaps the sequel will expand on making the various Transformers have more distinct personalities, but this first movie worked for me BECAUSE I cared about the human characters, so I didn't mind.

and why was anthony anderson in this movie? hmm...comic relief. he wasn't even that funny.


He was a crowd pleaser and worked to break that end-of-the-world depressing military stuff.

this is a nerd movie. am i a fanboy from the original series, yes, and michael bay, excuse me fore remembering the storyline. it was basically a tv show where robots fought, with LASERS. why did they have bullets?


I don't think you can make a movie on this scale only for nerds, like us. It must have mass appeal. The bullets/laser thing is nit-picking like the flames on OP.

why were the humans fighting too, they are ants compared to these alien forms. and how the heck does megatron get frozen. what is that. its stupid is what it is.


Again, to make us care. Acting is for the most part, in the eyes. It's hard to relate to 30 foot tall robots with steel eyes.

this movie could have been awesome. i could have overlooked the redesigns, the changes in the mythology, but i can't overlook two things. the amount of crappy humans in the movie, and the really bad dialogue. "your more then meets the eye", i woulda flunked out of film school for writing that. yay, that was worth the writers, what, 250,000 dollar salary


Oh, it was fun. And a nod to the cartoon, which I thought was well respected throughout, especially with the camaro/Bumble Bee hitting the VW bug in the beginning.

Overall, you have to forget the original a bit and understand the medium's are different. I expect there will be more Tranformers movies/direct-to-DVD releases and toys to come.

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

JUL 09, 2007 12:40 PM

Shalome said:

reprobate said:
I'm terribly curious as to why there are never articles deconstructing the pure redundant formulae of films like, say, Sideways?

I mean come on, I like pinot noir just as much as anyone, but really, I'm pretty sure I saw that movie just a few fucking times before, and when it was called Swingers they had better locations.

Must be because indie films are art or something.



Personally, i occasionally enjoy setting aside my knowledge of film and art and my personal pretentiousness and, you know, most of my brain... and WATCHING A MOVIE WHERE SHIT BLOWS UP AND GIANT ROBOTS FIGHT OMG OMG SO FUCKING RAD.

Transformers satisfied my need to see giant robots fight and explosions happen. Film lovers can go see something else.


I doubt you'd listen to someone who expressed the same opinion in a thread about The Insane Clown Posse or some other terrible music.

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

JUL 09, 2007 12:46 PM

RudieCantFail said:

malkav11 said:
Chihuahuas are the most annoying, ugly example of yappy small dog I can think of.



You've never encountered a Yorkshire Terrier then, have you?



Evidently thankfully so.

Dizzy

Dizzy

Los Angeles, CA
January 2004

JUL 09, 2007 06:19 PM

benhasglasses said:

transformers sucked hard. why? because when people make movies like this, they add too many humans. it's dumb. i thought john turtoro knew how to read a script, based upon his work with the coens, et al. apparently, he doesnt.



Such an odd thing to say when you think about the fact that the planet Earth is populated with, you got it..... humans.

brett54

brett54

Australia
November 2004

JUL 10, 2007 05:56 AM

Shalome said:

reprobate said:
I'm terribly curious as to why there are never articles deconstructing the pure redundant formulae of films like, say, Sideways?

I mean come on, I like pinot noir just as much as anyone, but really, I'm pretty sure I saw that movie just a few fucking times before, and when it was called Swingers they had better locations.

Must be because indie films are art or something.



Personally, i occasionally enjoy setting aside my knowledge of film and art and my personal pretentiousness and, you know, most of my brain... and WATCHING A MOVIE WHERE SHIT BLOWS UP AND GIANT ROBOTS FIGHT OMG OMG SO FUCKING RAD.

Transformers satisfied my need to see giant robots fight and explosions happen. Film lovers can go see something else.



Ah, Shalome is so sensible.
Pure escapism - you don't go to T'formers to think.
Shooting things, exploding things and hot, fast things (and thats the just the girls). wink

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next