I find large crowds unsettling. In every gathering of a certain size, theres a hidden potential lurking beneath the surface; it can manifest into laughter, sorrow, outrage, physical destruction, or... nothing at all. But when something does happen, our collective actions seem to distill into sweeping gestures, granting them far more weight and power than the sum of their parts. The 1992 L.A. riots were a particularly nasty example:
The very idea that a group of free-thinking individuals can somehow tap into a collectively unintelligent subconscious is terrifying, especially if you find yourself on the receiving end of a crowds rage. The AP reports that just last night in Austin, Texas a crowd lashed out:
A crowd attacked and killed a passenger in a vehicle that had struck and injured a child, police said Wednesday.
Police believe 2,000 to 3,000 people were in the area for a Juneteenth celebration when the attack occurred Tuesday night. The man who was killed had been trying to stop the group from attacking the vehicle's driver when the crowd turned on him, authorities said.
An accident happens; the fun-loving crowd transforms into a feral, bloodthirsty mob. Im sure alcohol played a part, though details of the altercation are scarce. I wonder if race was a factor? Apparently the driver was able to escape the crowd and has been cooperating with police. The child seems to be ok too, as authorities reported the kid was taken to the hospital with non-life threatening injuries.
Juneteenth, also known as Emancipation Day, is the celebration of the day news of the Emancipation Proclamation arrived in Texas, effectively abolishing slavery in the state. Its a shame to see the festivities tainted by bloodshed, but at the end of the day, as they say, the mob rules.
I think one impression that this article may undoubtedly leave the reader with is that black people are more prone to mob violence -- which is entirely untrue. Sporting event violence comes to mind. I don't mean to say that this is the intention, but that is probably an inevitable conclusion most readers would come to with the examples and comparisons provided.
Jesus, when did the *name* of a holiday become a measure of its legitimacy?
I'm not trying to downplay the importance of the holiday here, but are you saying there is significance to the name Juneteenth? Because all I get from that article is that it's a portmanteau. Am I missing something?
i'm not sure what there is to miss exactly. it's a portmanteau of an important date relating to the holiday... what you're saying is equivalent to "Why is the Fourth of July a good name for a holiday?"
Jesus, when did the *name* of a holiday become a measure of its legitimacy?
I'm not trying to downplay the importance of the holiday here, but are you saying there is significance to the name Juneteenth? Because all I get from that article is that it's a portmanteau. Am I missing something?
i'm not sure what there is to miss exactly. it's a portmanteau of an important date relating to the holiday... what you're saying is equivalent to "Why is the Fourth of July a good name for a holiday?"
wildswan said:
I think one impression that this article may undoubtedly leave the reader with is that black people are more prone to mob violence -- which is entirely untrue. Sporting event violence comes to mind. I don't mean to say that this is the intention, but that is probably an inevitable conclusion most readers would come to with the examples and comparisons provided.
Yes, I can see that even though I didn't intend that, someone could take it that way. That's something I'll keep in mind as I write in the future.
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3
Comments
wildswan
I'm lost
June 2006
JUN 21, 2007 11:50 AM
d20
San Francisco, CA
September 2003
JUN 21, 2007 12:03 PM
Admiral_Pants
Austin, TX
May 2004
JUN 21, 2007 09:08 PM
Aaron_Lariviere
Los Angeles, CA
May 2007
JUN 22, 2007 12:54 PM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3