• feature
  • SATURDAY MAY 5 2007 12:00 PM

Brad Warner's Hardcore Zen: Quentin Tarantino Embraces Buddhism?

Before I forget, for those of you who’ve bought my new book, Sit Down and Shut Up!, I found a mistake. Turn to page 74 and look at the bottom of the second complete paragraph. It says: "To really suppress anger, you have to suppress the urge to avoid the beautiful juiciness of it all." It's supposed to say, "...suppress the urge to enjoy the beautiful juiciness of it all." So go get your Bic and fix that. Thanks. Those of you who haven’t bought the book must do so right now. You will obey me. OBEY! OBEY!!

AND I'll be doing a talk and book signing on MAY 17th, 2007 at the BODHI TREE BOOKSTORE which is located in West Hollywood, California (click for directions) at 7:30 PM. So show up, dammit! A good time will be had by all.

I imagine most of you saw the news post by Psuedonymph this week about Quentin Tarantino. It seems that Quentin, being influenced by Uma Thurman’s dad Robert “Buddha Bob” Thurman, has embraced the philosophy of Buddhism and come to know the truth of his past lives — including former existences as a black slave and as Chinese and Japanese people. I don’t know nuthin’ ‘bout Tarantino embracin’ no Buddhism. But I wouldn't mind embracing Uma Thurman.

When Psuedonymph called me up to ask what I thought of the story I said it sounded pretty dippy to me. I mean I love Tarantino as a writer and director. But as a Buddhist? I don’t think so…

Lots and lots and lots of people these days seem to think that all Buddhists believe in reincarnation. In fact, one of the main reasons for the popularity of Buddhism in America these days is because so many Americans think that Buddhism is the belief in reincarnation. So let me state this clearly and for the record I am a Buddhist teacher and I do not believe in reincarnation. In fact, you’ll find that a great number of Buddhists do not believe in reincarnation. Dogen, the founder of the sect I belong to, said, “Firewood, after becoming ash, does not again become firewood. Similarly, human beings, after death, do not live again.”

Dogen was highly critical of the belief in reincarnation, going so far as to say that people who claimed to be Buddhists and still espoused that belief weren’t really Buddhists at all. At the risk of offending Robert Thurman and thereby ending forever my chances to embrace Uma, I tend to concur. I think the belief in reincarnation is a complete distortion of everything the Buddha taught. It seems to have been shoe-horned into the philosophy at a later time by folks with misguided notions about popularizing it. In its most basic form Buddhism has nothing whatsoever to do with the belief in reincarnation.

Buddha had a completely different view of time from that of pretty much anybody else in his day. To him, the only real time is right now, this very moment. The past is just memory and the future is just a dream. In the moment when we’re alive, we’re alive. In the moment of death, we die. In truth, though, we are dying every single moment. You are not the same person you were when you read the first paragraph of this article. That person is dead and gone, never to return or be reincarnated. The only way you can have reincarnation is when you believe in linear time, when you believe that there is some immutable entity — your “self” or your “soul” — that stays the same while everything else around it changes. Buddha flatly denied that idea. It’s a shame to see those who call themselves his followers embracing it.

As soon as you start spinning off dreams about what might happen to you after you die or what you were before you were born you’ve completely left the realm of reality and entered the land of fantasy. In spite of Tarantino’s assertion that he has “just a feeling, a knowing” about his former life as Kunte Kinte’s bunkmate, nobody — and I mean nobody — knows their past lives. Hell, we don’t even know what we did at breakfast yesterday. You may have memories of this or that. But how reliable is your memory? Mine isn’t worth shit, I know that. Whether it’s a memory of a past life or a memory of a night out with Uma, all memory is just the action of the brain cells. It’s not reality. Only this moment is reality.

The whole past lives deal sucks most people right in and once you mention it they can’t seem to concentrate on anything else. Lost in dreams of glorious lives lived in former centuries they’ll never notice where they really are right now. I cannot seriously accept anyone as a Buddhist Master if they’re encouraging their followers to live in dreams and fantasies. Sorry everybody. But I can’t.

Look. Everyone is afraid to die. And we’d all like for some starry-eyed mystic in robes who seems to know things that are hidden from our view to come up and tell us not to worry, that we’re going to live forever. Starry-eyed guys in robes have made a damned good living selling that fantasy for thousands of years. But it’s all just smoke and mirrors. They don’t know anything you don’t know. Not a one of them.

So what happens after you die? Fuck if I know. I’m scheduled to go to Japan next week and I have no idea what’s gonna happen to me after I get there. I can plan for it. I can dream about it. I can even buy a bullet train ticket to Kyoto for the Tuesday after I arrive. But that doesn’t mean I know anything about what will really happen in my future. Being able to live with the unknown is the only way to live a truly happy life.

In the case of past and former lives — or Heaven, Hell and Purgatory (Limbo’s been abolished) if you prefer — there’s really no point at all in speculating. Even if it were true what good would it do you to know? So you were Napoleon? Now you’re waiting tables in Fresno. You’re much better off fawning over that guy in the nice suit so he’ll give you a good tip than getting so caught up in reliving the Italian campaign of 1796 that you forget to pour him some more coffee.

This is what counts, the life you’re living now. If anyone should know that it’s a guy like Quentin Tarantino. You don’t make a masterpiece like Kill Bill by worrying about what your soul was doing 400 years ago. You do it by paying attention to what’s going on right now. The ability to fantasize has some use when writing fiction or writing screenplays —I even use my own ability to fantasize when writing non-fiction like this. Buddhist literature is, in fact, full of made-up stories intended to illustrate a point. But even in these cases we can only use fantasy in a productive way when we understand the difference between our imaginations and what is actually real. The dream of the movie Kill Bill didn’t sell a bazillion tickets, as the millions of people who fantasize about making their masterpiece but never take any action towards realizing it can attest. The movie itself on 35mm celluloid is completely different from the dream. Reincarnation fantasies always blur the distinction between dreams and reality. They should be avoided.

So Quentin, if you ever really get interested in Buddhism, feel free to stop by my Saturday morning sittings in Santa Monica (see below). Or, better yet, just send Uma around for a private lesson…

Brad Warner is the author of Hardcore Zen and Sit Down and Shut Up!. He maintains a blog about Buddhist stuff. If you're in Southern California and you want to try some Zazen for yourself, he has a group that meets every Saturday in Santa Monica.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

Comments
galapag

galapag

I'm lost
April 2007

MAY 05, 2007 12:22 PM

thanks.. but 2 many words.

mrnonel

mrnonel

Los Angeles, CA
August 2004

MAY 05, 2007 12:41 PM

Turn to page 74 and look at the bottom of the second complete paragraph. It says: "To really suppress anger, you have to suppress the urge to avoid the beautiful juiciness of it all." It's supposed to say, "...suppress the urge to enjoy the beautiful juiciness of it all." So go get your Bic and fix that.

If I have the opportunity to meet you at an autograph session, I will ask you politely to make the correction for me. I don't feel comfortable with changing your words. As I read the page, it looked OK with me. Isn't Buddhism about being free of all types psychological urges?

zyryx

zyryx

Tyler, TX
April 2004

MAY 05, 2007 12:44 PM

couldn't agree more.

TerranWanderer

TerranWanderer

Boulder, CO
April 2006

MAY 05, 2007 12:51 PM

I have to say, Brad's articles are the first I've found on Buddhism that have really portrayed the philosophy in a way that makes sense. Up until now, I had an image of modern Buddhism as being full of people lost in the spiritual fantasy of past lives even though I alwasy kind of felt it was in conflict with the Buddha's actual teachings. But I hadn't studied it well enough to know, and I figured all those other teachers knew the philosophy better than I did, so I didn't bother. It's good to hear there are versions of Buddhism out there that take a much more realistic view of the universe and place the appropriate emphasis on the lives we have, rather than the fantasy of what has been or might be.

Great article!

galapag

galapag

I'm lost
April 2007

MAY 05, 2007 12:59 PM

galapag said:
thanks.. but 2 many words.



Dogen.. Had his fist up his ass.. Although a mighty fine person!



abracadabra

abracadabra

Seattle, WA
April 2004

MAY 05, 2007 01:05 PM

Way to "Be Here Now"..What's your take on Ram Daas ?

lowroller

lowroller

Australia
May 2008

MAY 05, 2007 07:38 PM

I'd embrace Uma too. biggrin

brhood

brhood

Australia
April 2004

MAY 06, 2007 01:20 AM

galapag said:

galapag said:
thanks.. but 2 many words.



Dogen.. Had his fist up his ass.. Although a mighty fine person!



Why troll in an SG coloumn?

surreal

Nokturn

Nokturn

United Kingdom
April 2006

MAY 06, 2007 08:10 AM

I'm glad to see a Buddhist teacher stand up and say he doesn't believe in reincarnation.
Neither do I and I often find in the Buddhist groups I do that people get stuck on pondering past lives rather than living in the present, which is of course the fundemental purpose of Buddhism.

And Tarantino will 'become' anything he wishes to sell next.
I loved his first few films but the guy's a one trick pony.
Having said that I'd love him to now go and make an action drama with Richard Gere and Steven Seagal.

Tritone

Tritone

Saint Paul, MN
May 2004

MAY 06, 2007 10:33 AM

mrnonel said:
Turn to page 74 and look at the bottom of the second complete paragraph. It says: "To really suppress anger, you have to suppress the urge to avoid the beautiful juiciness of it all." It's supposed to say, "...suppress the urge to enjoy the beautiful juiciness of it all." So go get your Bic and fix that.

If I have the opportunity to meet you at an autograph session, I will ask you politely to make the correction for me. I don't feel comfortable with changing your words. As I read the page, it looked OK with me. Isn't Buddhism about being free of all types psychological urges?



It's probably not helpful to repress or revel in your anger.

KravenDarkness

KravenDarkness

Maryville, TN
March 2007

MAY 06, 2007 10:45 AM


"If you wanna play blind man, then walk with a Shepherd. But me, eyes are wide fuckin' open."
-Jules
Pulp Fiction


That relates somehow............i think

Tororo

Tororo

France
August 2002

MAY 06, 2007 02:19 PM

Great article, as usual. smile

And as I was reading the comments, I stumbled upon:

"I don't feel comfortable with changing your words. As I read the page, it looked OK with me."

So I thought of something that could be in some way related to the views you express...
For centuries, it was accepted, as an article of faith, by Christians, that unicorns existed , because the Ancient Testament supposedly mentioned unicorns... later it was found out that, in the part about unicorns, early Bible translators simply mistranslated to Greek some ambiguous Hebrew noun....

NadirByte

NadirByte

I'm lost
May 2007

MAY 06, 2007 09:51 PM

It's good to hear that, of Dogen's statements with regards to reincarnation. That there is precedent to a patient disregard of belief in reincarnation , I find it reincouraging.

If you would read this, I would inquire: Have you heard of Soka Gakkai? and whaat might be your impressions on the same?null

NadirByte

NadirByte

I'm lost
May 2007

MAY 06, 2007 10:29 PM

I cannot seriously accept anyone as a Buddhist Master if they're encouraging their followers to live in dreams and fantasies.



Remarkable point.

That delusions are not enlightenment, is it not represented in the works of shakyamuni?

ratzaz

ratzaz

Nashville, TN
March 2007

MAY 07, 2007 03:41 AM

First, as Brad knows a lot better than I do, the mainstream Soto sect doesn't believe in reincarnation, but they do believe in rebirth. Reincarnation is out because there is a fundamental Buddhist principle called Anatman, which means there is no soul so there is nothing to be reborn. They do believe that karma clustered together stays clustered through lifetimes. I don't think this makes any sense either, and I like Brad's teacher's Nishijima's view on this: death is death.

Speaking of Nishijima, I highy recommend his book A Heart to Heart Chat on Buddhism with Old Master Gudo, with Jundo Cohen, another transmitted disciple, if you like more straight talk on Buddhism without the flowery evasions that make up most of the Buddhist press.

And of course I like Uma. Everybody likes Uma.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next