IPOD
RADIO
This Article Sucks But Your Mom Was "A TOUR-DE-FORCE!" (OR:The Wonderful World of Misquoting)
SUNDAY APRIL 29 2007 8:00 PM
Submitted by _DictionaryGirl_. Edited By Rahodeb.
TAGS: literature, misquoting, sneaky underhanded tactics, how is this news?
Here's a nice read for a lazy Sunday evening: New York Times frequent contributor Henry Alford has an essay in the Online Sunday Book Review today about the seedy underworld of ridiculous misquoting for book jacket blurbs. Everyone kind of knows that it goes on with movies all the time, with hyperecstatic quotes ranging from cherry-picked to made-up to being taken from Ain't it Cool News, but I'd never given too much thought to what goes on with books. You'd think publishers would be above all that, wouldn't you? Eh, of course not.
Call it misblurbing. We’d like to think that while the quotations in movie ads regularly feature near-hysterical raves from marginal or even nonexistent critics, the genteel world of book publishing is above all that. (editor's note -- I know, right?!) But that doesn’t seem to be the case, and some say publishers are becoming only more brazen. “It’s gotten much worse recently,” said Po Bronson, the author of “What Should I Do With My Life?” and a member of the board of advisers of Consortium, a book distributor that specializes in independent publishers. “There’s a feeling of, ‘Ah, no one’s looking anymore.’ ” The liberal editing of promotional verbiage can extend even to blurbs that publishers ask successful authors to provide for less-established ones. “Usually they come back with changes and say, ‘Is this O.K.?,’ and it’s very different from what I gave them,” Bronson said.
The funniest part of the article is the defensiveness with which the editors justify their actions, citing a sort of moral hierarchy to the remodeling of praise (or what passes for it) in which outright making things up is the worst offense, festive sprinklings of exclamation points warrants a sideways glance at most (despite drawing ire from the inimitable Sarah Vowell), and anything else in between is subject to a sliding scale of scorn or condoning.
Taking words or sentences out of context is one level down, while extracting the sole positive comment from a negative review is at the bottom, if it’s an offense at all. “We have a threshold here,” Richard Nash, the publisher of Soft Skull Press, said. “If it’s a B review or above, we’ll look for the positive. But you can’t take something that’s a C+ or below and pull positive stuff out.”
The novelist Laura Zigman, a former publicist at several houses, admits to getting a bit creative with the ellipses when excerpting reviews on her Web site. “Sometimes you have to eliminate 9 or 10 words to find the praise in there,” she said. “I’ll sit and think, ‘Oooh, there’s something salvageable.’ You’re demented. It gives you this weird sense of control and make-believe.” Zigman suggests there should be a rule: “Like, there has to be five words in a row from the review.”
Yet another reason why the best books are usually described with full, coherent sentences where the number of letters isn't eclipsed by the number of ellipses. Perhaps not "news" per se, and definitely not shocking when you really think about it, but if anything it's just another friendly reminder not to believe every single little thing you read. Especially when it's taken out of context.
"Readers be warned...This Article...is...dictionary...Girls'...finest...tour-de-force...achievement...complex [and] lavish...riveting." ~ Various Artists
Image: New York Times
376 Comments
PAGE:
1 | 2
magpieboy
Seattle, WA
June 2004
APR 29, 2007 08:09 PM
emperorreagan
Baltimore, MD
January 2004
APR 29, 2007 08:16 PM
catdad
Portland, OR
August 2002
APR 29, 2007 08:22 PM
Girthy
Los Angeles, CA
July 2005
APR 29, 2007 08:27 PM
aleksa
Tacoma, WA
April 2006
APR 29, 2007 08:28 PM
ElPasoAgresso
San Francisco, CA
April 2004
APR 29, 2007 08:35 PM
ElPasoAgresso
San Francisco, CA
April 2004
APR 29, 2007 08:39 PM
Vanessa
SUICIDEGIRL
New Mexico, USA
APR 29, 2007 08:52 PM
ckdexterhaven
Redding, CA
December 2005
APR 29, 2007 08:53 PM
malkav11
Saint Paul, MN
July 2003
APR 29, 2007 09:24 PM
GonzoChaote
Vancouver, BC
March 2007
APR 29, 2007 11:36 PM
malkav11
Saint Paul, MN
July 2003
APR 30, 2007 12:24 AM
goodpoltergeist
Auburn, AL
January 2007
APR 30, 2007 06:04 AM
Julian_Delphinki
Albuquerque, NM
June 2005
APR 30, 2007 08:36 AM
DhD_No_Pants
Katy, TX
May 2006
APR 30, 2007 09:15 AM
PAGE:
1 | 2