• news
  • WEDNESDAY MARCH 28 2007 10:00 AM

Who Wrote Frankenstein?



Fittingly, the story behind the creation of the novel Frankenstein is almost as famous as that of the monster itself.

Mary Shelley, only nineteen at the time, spent the cold summer of 1816 with her future husband, Percy Bysshe Shelley; Lord Byron; and Byron’s doctor, John William Polidori. Due to the subnormal temperatures, the group was forced to stay indoors where they entertained each other by reading from a book of German ghost stories. When Lord Byron challenged the group to write their own stories, Mary Shelley came up with the first spark that would become the classic Frankenstein. Remarkably, Polidori was also inspired by Byron that night and later wrote what is considered to be the first modern vampire story, The Vampyre . Two horror greats were born that night. It don't get any more goth than that, people.

Now, however, one scholar is claiming that the story might not be true, at least when it comes to Mary Shelley and her monster. How did a marginally-educated nineteen-year old come up with what is now thought of as one of the first science-fiction novels, and why didn't she ever write anything of merit again? Perhaps she wasn’t the author at all, according to John Lauritsen, who claims that Percy Bysshe Shelley actually wrote the novel.

Lauritsen, a Harvard-educated "independent scholar" who has spent seven years in its libraries comparing the texts of Shelley's great works such as Ozymandias with his wife's subsequent books, says Frankenstein was too profound to have been created by an "ill-educated 19-year-old whose later writings were just ordinary".

He says some of the language, with lines such as "I will glut the maw of death", were pure Shelley, and that the young aristocrat wrote a handful of fashionable horror tales that echo the later tone of Frankenstein. Lauritsen said Shelley had many reasons to disguise his authorship, including hints of "free love" that had already driven him out of England and an undertone of "Romantic, but I would not say gay, male love".

Lauritsen also points out that the first edition of Frankenstein was published with no author credited and was roundly panned by the critics of the time. Obviously, a book like this is going to cause some controversy, but at least one critic, Camille Paglia, writing in Salon sees the novel as not only an important investigation, but a shot fired across the bow of academia as well.

Lauritsen's book is important not only for its audacious theme but for the devastating portrait it draws of the insularity and turgidity of the current academy. As an independent scholar, Lauritsen is beholden to no one. As a consequence, he can fight openly with myopic professors and, without fear of retribution, condemn them for their inability to read and reason.

Will a village of angry scholars armed with pitchforks and torches be coming for Lauritsen when his book, The Man Who Wrote Frankenstein comes out next month? Only time will tell.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next

Comments
DeceptiviewFilm

DeceptiviewFilm

Parlin, NJ
February 2004

MAR 28, 2007 12:06 PM

Squire said:

yourfashionwar said:

Squire said:

yourfashionwar said:

so they had to get a head start i guess? i guess we have the creation of adolescence to blame.



You mean "creation of adolescents" don't you? skull

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

Sorry. I just had to get that out of me. Much better now thanks.



i'm so confused.



Dr. Frankenstein, you know, created the monster.



it's Frankensteen. Not Frankenstein. Steen. Just like its not Eegor. its EYEGOR.

Smuffy

Smuffy

I'm lost
December 2003

MAR 28, 2007 12:07 PM

Cassiel said:
Ken Russell make a really great film about that night in Byron's castle, and the supernatural incidents that it entails: Gothic, with Natasha Richardson as Mary Shelley, Julian Sands as Percy Shelley, Gabriel Byrne as Lord Byron, and Timothy Spall as Polidori. Really eerie, disturbing flick--highly recommended.



I'm adding this to my netflix immediately!

Smuffy

Smuffy

I'm lost
December 2003

MAR 28, 2007 12:10 PM

DeceptiviewFilm said:
it's Frankensteen. Not Frankenstein. Steen. Just like its not Eegor. its EYEGOR.



I've always seen it spelled frankenstein.

even the inside cover of shelley's original work spells it as such.



I don't understand your point.

AndersWolleck

AndersWolleck

Astoria, NY
February 2003

MAR 28, 2007 12:10 PM

i thought frankenstein was a universal movie

Smuffy

Smuffy

I'm lost
December 2003

MAR 28, 2007 12:10 PM

also it's igor (or ygor).

rev123

rev123

USA
OLD SKOOL

MAR 28, 2007 12:11 PM

He's referencing Young Frankenstein. You should probably Netflix that too.

formerviking

formerviking

Denver, PA
May 2006

MAR 28, 2007 12:13 PM

DeceptiviewFilm said:

Flinty said:
There wolf.



There castle.



What knockers eeek

Smuffy

Smuffy

I'm lost
December 2003

MAR 28, 2007 12:13 PM

rev138 said:
He's referencing Young Frankenstein. You should probably Netflix that too.



no thanks. I don't like gene wilder.

Smuffy

Smuffy

I'm lost
December 2003

MAR 28, 2007 12:16 PM

either way the only way I can bow out of this with some dignity is saying 'my bad.'

DeadBilly

DeadBilly

Burnt Cabins, PA
February 2004

MAR 28, 2007 12:18 PM

grave_chilling said:
but it's unlikely that he would be the author. Frankenstein is a feminist tale, and while Percy was ahead of his time, he was still a man.



I guess you're not familiar with Ibsin's "A Dolls House"?

Margot_Dent

Margot_Dent

Los Angeles, CA
February 2004

MAR 28, 2007 12:20 PM

Smuffy said:

rev138 said:
He's referencing Young Frankenstein. You should probably Netflix that too.



no thanks. I don't like gene wilder.



whaaaaaaaaaat?

Squire

Squire

I'm lost
November 2003

MAR 28, 2007 12:21 PM

baudot

baudot

Oakland, CA
February 2004

MAR 28, 2007 12:32 PM

Regardless of who wrote it, it's an excellent book.

artmovesproduct

artmovesproduct

Denver, CO
August 2006

MAR 28, 2007 12:44 PM

There's no reason why one couldn't give her credit for at least the idea behind one of history's darkest, most twisted and brutal tales. If there's anything more twisted and brutal than the brain of a 19-year-old girl, I don't want to see it.

bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

MAR 28, 2007 12:59 PM

SignalNoise said:
The notion that a person could write one *singular* piece, and that not do much else doesn't seem that impossible to swallow. Lots of people are defined by one *great* work, and a series of other lesser pieces. There are even modern examples, like Harper Lee.

Also, can I say, that nothing makes me roll my eyes more than "independent scholars sticking it to the establishment." I never got that. First, academics aren't just people with opinions who yell a lot. There are standards of evidence that matter, preferably driven by a theory. So an "aberration" in the available data is not the same thing as proving everyone else wrong - it needs to stand up to existing theories and counter-evidence.

Also, this notion that academics just bury people that disagree with them always strikes me as a bit odd. People who are just flat out wrong, and have terrible methods/bad inferences *do* get it handed to them. But someone who can come up a brand new, unorthodox idea with *powerful evidence* coupled with *good theory and methods* - that person probably gets a really nice job.

Often, when writing a dissertation, people want counterintuitive results, b/c that gets attention. The problem is people just drop in on an academic disciplines, acting like their random bits of facts strung together inherently meet the rigorous standards of academic work. And when academics dismiss it is as the hooey it often is, the "victim" cries about stodgy intellectual elitism, not realizing it's just shitty work.


I was going to write my own comment, but you just said everything I wanted to say much more eloquently than it's likely I would have.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next