- news
- WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 21 2007 3:00 PM
Is This Horse Fetus Dead Yet? Or Does it Need More Meth?
Submitted by Bitch_PhD
Edited by erin_broadley

So, a little more research and, apparently, for most of us, news about meth use during pregnancy.
According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration,
* It is not solely the use of a specific substance that affects the child welfare system; it is a complex relationship between
o The substance use pattern
o Variations across States and local jurisdictions regarding policies and practices
o Knowledge and skills of workers
o Access to appropriate health and social supports for families
That last is what I want to concentrate on. The first question the substance abuse pattern is one I hope to address in a later post, but for now I'll simply point out that one of the major problems with *any* understanding of how most illegal drugs affect pregnancy is that, because they're illegal, it's very hard to distinguish between the effects of the drug itself and the effects of any other substances or additives that may have been used in producing or cutting the drug e.g., antifreeze used in making meth, or quinine used to cut heroin. Moreover, since many (if not most) addicts use more than one drug (including smoking) or get their drugs from different sources, the problem of tracing specific effects to specific drugs only gets more difficult. And finally, the observed effects of drug use during pregnancy it's important that they're observed, rather than known, since you can't always know the cause of what you see are surely, in many cases, affected by other factors like the mother's health or nutrition or her local environment: stress, environmental pollutants, and lots of unknown factors mean that non-drug users also have babies with some of these problems.
That said, the apparent risks of meth use while pregnancy which depend on how often and how much is used, as well as at what stage of pregnancy, mind, so keep in mind that making generalizations about whether or not a given woman's meth use will "cause" these would be a massive overgeneralization include:
birth defects, growth retardation, premature birth, low birth weight, (and) brain lesions. Problems at birth may include difficulty sucking and swallowing, hypersensitivity to touch, excessive muscle tension (hypertonia), (and) long term risks may include developmental disorders, cognitive deficits, learning disabilities, poor social adjustment, language deficits
I didn't emphasize the "mays" in that quotation, but I hope you noticed them.
My point here isn't that using meth (or any other drug, including alcohol, tobacco, or prescription medication) is a-ok during pregnancy. Using meth or drinking heavily or smoking isn't a-ok even when you're not pregnant duh. My point is that simple judgments about drugs' effects on pregnancy aren't supported by the science; even when we know that in general X drug tends to cause Y outcome, that isn't the same thing as saying that this specific user is going to have that specific result. The most one can say is that it puts a user at an elevated risk for that result.
And there are things that we can do to mitigate those risks. Again according to SAMHSA, the critical factor in a child's outcome is not the simple fact of use itself, but the home environment. The consequences of use or even of a poor home environment can be mediated if we actually care about the child's well-being more than we do about casting blame on the mother.
One of the most effective solutions to the problem of mothers using meth is formally prioritizing families with children in treatment programs. Meth users, in fact, have:
* the highest "satisfactory" outcome after treatment programs, at 65.6%;
* the highest result for ongoing reunification services between mother and child when a baby that's been removed from the mother (usually after being tested for the presence of a drug at birth--which by the way, isn't done routinely--so there may be babies with meth problems that we don't know about, *and* there may be babies born with meth in their systems who are doing fine) and the mother is offered treatment rather than incarceration;
* the second shortest amount of separation between mother and baby in these cases. The shortest separation time is for babies who tested positive for marijuana.
In short, as the Supreme Court of Hawaii found in the first case there where a woman was arrested for meth use during pregnancy, arresting pregnant drug users
violates well-established consensus in the medical community that such a prosecution is irrational, ineffective, and counterproductive to maternal, fetal and newborn health.
For what it's worth, I've met the woman who was prosecuted in that Hawaii case. Her baby was born premature, and died after being released from the hospital (raising the question of why, if his health was compromised at birth, the hospital released him). Prosecutors assumed his death was the result of her having smoked meth a few days before delivery. After getting clean and getting through her prosecution, Tayshea Aiwohi has gone on to establish a foundation to help women recover from drug addiction and be reuinted with their children. It's named after her dead son. Seems to me she's doing a lot more good than the prosecutors who wanted to lock her up and throw away the key.
Bitch_PhD, being a liberal, is objectively pro-drug use.




PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Comments
Flawedhero
Suwanee, GA
October 2006
FEB 21, 2007 03:48 PM
RileyStClair
Los Angeles, CA
September 2006
FEB 21, 2007 03:53 PM
StarBelliedBoy
Philadelphia, PA
December 2003
FEB 21, 2007 03:54 PM
Margot_Dent
Los Angeles, CA
February 2004
FEB 21, 2007 03:59 PM
bananameltdown
Tampa, FL
July 2004
FEB 21, 2007 03:59 PM
apesamongus
Atlanta, GA
July 2002
FEB 21, 2007 04:01 PM
DyeWhiteGirls
Madison, WI
December 2003
FEB 21, 2007 04:12 PM
zyryx
Tyler, TX
April 2004
FEB 21, 2007 04:12 PM
KtheTwentyThird
Ypsilanti, MI
March 2005
FEB 21, 2007 04:19 PM
catatac
San Diego, CA
June 2005
FEB 21, 2007 04:20 PM
Wendy
SUICIDEGIRL
Israel
FEB 21, 2007 04:21 PM
Margot_Dent
Los Angeles, CA
February 2004
FEB 21, 2007 04:22 PM
DyeWhiteGirls
Madison, WI
December 2003
FEB 21, 2007 04:25 PM
emperorreagan
Baltimore, MD
January 2004
FEB 21, 2007 04:29 PM
ItwasDuke
New York, NY
March 2004
FEB 21, 2007 04:45 PM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6