• news
  • TUESDAY FEBRUARY 20 2007 11:00 AM

Bearing Responsibility



Why do I care about the rights of pregnant meth users? Let's start small.

For most "respectable" women, the main thing you'll be told when you get pregnant is "don't drink alcohol." In fact, let's grab a beer out of the fridge and look at what the warning label says:

Government Warning (1) According to the Surgeon General, women should not drink alcoholic beverages during pregnancy because of the risk of birth defects. (2) Consumption of alcoholic beverages impairs your ability to drive a car or operate machinery, and may cause health problems.


Everyone who drinks has seen these warnings, right? So we all know — and when you're pregnant, your doctor will remind you — that pregnant women shouldn't drink.

Notice, in fact, that while pregnant women "should not" drink, non-pregnant women — and men — aren't told what they should, or shouldn't do. They're given the facts — drinking "impairs your ability to drive" and "may cause health problems" — and expected to make their own, informed, decisions. Pregnant women, on the other hand, are told directly what they should do.
There are two implications here: first, that pregnant women are less able than men or non-pregnant women to think for themselves; and second, that alcohol is more dangerous for pregnant women (or their fetuses) than it is for "normal" people.

The first implication — that pregnant women can't think for themselves — is obviously stupid and insulting. If you're like me, when someone tells you what to do, you're inclined to tell them to fuck off. But before we tell the "don't drink while pregnant" crowd to fuck off, let's see what the problems with drinking while pregnant actually are — after all, it's a Big Deal, this pregnancy thing, and we wouldn't want to let knee-jerk attitudes about being grownups (after all, we're pregnant! How much more grownup can you get?) affect our judgment.

So let's move on to the second implication. Is alcohol, in fact, more dangerous for pregnant women than it is for everyone else? To find out, I'm consulting Conceiving Risk, Bearing Responsibility: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and the Diagnosis of Moral Disorder. I stole the title of this post from the book, by the way. According to the author, Elizabeth Armstrong,

The fact is we simply do not know. . . . while ample evidence indicates that heavy prenatal alcohol exposure can be tetrogenic (that is, cause birth defects) in some pregnancies, . . . the number of fetuses exposed and affected is small.

First, we know that FAS is not an "equal opportunity" birth defect. Fetal alcohol syndrome is highly correlated with smoking, poverty, malnutrition, high parity, and advanced maternal age.
[...]
Second, despite evidence to suggest that FAS may have a genetic component, there has been surprisingly little research. . . . One (kind of evidence) is from studies of twins: the medical literature has reported cases of franternal twins, in which one twin is affected with FAS and the other is not.
[...]
Third, even among women who are alcoholics, only a small number have babies who are affected. . . . In fact, only about 5 percent of children born to alcoholic women have FAS.


Five percent of children born to alcoholics. That ain't much. I think it is fair to say, without dismissing the importance of FAS, that most "normal" women — the kind of women who read alcohol warning labels, who see doctors during pregnancy, who are inclined to think about what they eat and drink — do not have much to worry about. Alcoholics, by and large, don't read warning labels and are far less likely than most of us to get decent prenatal care (which may, in and of itself, be a big part of the problem). If you care about FAS, your primary concern should be helping pregnant alcoholics get prenatal care, which includes treatment for their alcoholism.

Finally, let's don't forget that most women don't realize they're pregnant for a month or two. By which point, if you've been drinking, you've probably already done the majority of whatever damage you're going to do. IME, that ain't much; I went out drinking with my friends every weekend for two months before I realized I was knocked up, and as far as I and my kid's teachers can tell, he's smarter than most of the other kids on the playground. God knows, at 10 lbs 1 oz, he didn't have low birthweight (supposedly one of the markers of FAS). He's reading at grade level, his math is well above grade level, and he can tell you how DNA works, what a metaphor is, and how to build a working rocket.

So yeah. I'm inclined to say that drinking during pregnancy — by which I mean, "drinking during pregnancy by women who aren't alcoholics" — is okay. I'm inclined to think that people who claim that there are "tons" of kids with FAS in public schools are talking out their asses. I'm inclined to think that people who give you the fisheye when you order a cocktail in your seventh month are judgmental assholes. And I'm inclined to think that a lot of the hype around women's "responsibility" not to drink while pregnant is a big, guilt-tripping load of bullshit.

Bitch_PhD likes a good fight, and thinks people who pass judgment on pregnant women need to be smacked.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 ... 11

Next

Comments
DyeWhiteGirls

DyeWhiteGirls

Madison, WI
December 2003

FEB 20, 2007 05:36 PM

Bitch_PhD said:


Honeestly, it isn't. One drink isn't going to adversely affect any pregnancy. Nor are half a dozen. What seems to make a difference is habitual heavy drinking. The rest of it is p.r. propaganda, the same stuff you got in your elementary school D.A.R.E. program: "marijuana is a gateway drug! 99% of crack users have tried marijuana! Therefore, if you try marijuana, you'll end up addicted to crack!" I assume everyone can see the logical fallacy there; same thing with FAS.



Wrong:

In the United States, many doctors as well as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) claim that it is best that pregnant women not drink any alcohol.

This is silly. If it's "morally reprehensible" for pregnant women to do anything that has any potential to damage a fetus, then *breathing* is morally reprehensible. Leaving the house has the potential to damage a fetus. Not leaving the house has the potential to damage a fetus. Exercising has the potential to damage a fetus. Not exercising has the potential to damage a fetus. The fact of the matter is, women are human beings--even while pregnant!--and like everyone else they have the right to expect other people to mind their own damn business.



You obviously are not reading what I'm writing. Breathing is essential to life. Leaving the house is essential. Exercise is essential. Indulging in alcohol is completely useless.

I will also not mind my own damn business when I hear that people are putting their unborn children at risk.

Silly. If someone is so addicted to alcohol that they can't stop--pregnant or otherwise--then expecting them to be 100% compliant with a birth control regimen is ludicrous. Even leaving aside the fact that all birth control regimens fail sometimes, even with perfect use.



And this is the very reason that I'm pro-choice.

EDIT: Also, keeping your pants on is a wonderful birth control method. 100% effective. Go masturbate.

Zilchtastic

Zilchtastic

USA
November 2004

FEB 20, 2007 05:36 PM

Bitch_PhD said:

DyeWhiteGirls said:
One drink can adversely affect a pregnancy. There is nothing more to discuss here, because this is a fact.



Honeestly, it isn't. One drink isn't going to adversely affect any pregnancy. Nor are half a dozen. What seems to make a difference is habitual heavy drinking. The rest of it is p.r. propaganda, the same stuff you got in your elementary school D.A.R.E. program: "marijuana is a gateway drug! 99% of crack users have tried marijuana! Therefore, if you try marijuana, you'll end up addicted to crack!" I assume everyone can see the logical fallacy there; same thing with FAS.

DyeWhiteGirlsIf we choose .00000000000000000001% as the potential for alcohol to damage a fetus, it is still morally reprehensible to indulge in something so pointless. You can justify your actions and make yourself feel better by ignoring this, but the fact is that it's true.



This is silly. If it's "morally reprehensible" for pregnant women to do anything that has any potential to damage a fetus, then *breathing* is morally reprehensible. Leaving the house has the potential to damage a fetus. Not leaving the house has the potential to damage a fetus. Exercising has the potential to damage a fetus. Not exercising has the potential to damage a fetus. The fact of the matter is, women are human beings--even while pregnant!--and like everyone else they have the right to expect other people to mind their own damn business.


DyeWhiteGirlsIf you feel so attached to alcohol that you can't possibly stop while pregnant, DON'T PROCREATE. The world will be much better off without people with this mindset parenting.



Silly. If someone is so addicted to alcohol that they can't stop--pregnant or otherwise--then expecting them to be 100% compliant with a birth control regimen is ludicrous. Even leaving aside the fact that all birth control regimens fail sometimes, even with perfect use.




Um, except that you HAVE to breathe. You don't have to drink.

Saying "the world's full of danger to unborn fetuses so there's no harm in adding a little more!" just doesn't make sense to me. Sure, you could fall down the stairs or get in a car accident or be shot in a drive-by, but none of those things are your fault. Choosing to drink or smoke kind of is. Maybe the jury's still out on how much alcohol it takes to adversely affect a growing baby, but in the meanwhile I'd still err on the side of caution and maybe steer clear of the dangers I can control, unlike breathing pollution or being chased by axe murderers, which I can't.

DyeWhiteGirls

DyeWhiteGirls

Madison, WI
December 2003

FEB 20, 2007 05:41 PM

StarBelliedBoy said:

Bitch_PhD said:
One drink isn't going to adversely affect any pregnancy. Nor are half a dozen. What seems to make a difference is habitual heavy drinking. The rest of it is p.r. propaganda, the same stuff you got in your elementary school D.A.R.E. program: "marijuana is a gateway drug! 99% of crack users have tried marijuana! Therefore, if you try marijuana, you'll end up addicted to crack!" I assume everyone can see the logical fallacy there; same thing with FAS.



To what fucking end? Is there some massive conspiracy to keep pregnant women from drinking because then they'd be super awesome?! That's pretty much what your argument is starting to sound like.

Bitch_PhD said:
This is silly. If it's "morally reprehensible" for pregnant women to do anything that has any potential to damage a fetus, then *breathing* is morally reprehensible. Leaving the house has the potential to damage a fetus. Not leaving the house has the potential to damage a fetus. Exercising has the potential to damage a fetus. Not exercising has the potential to damage a fetus. The fact of the matter is, women are human beings--even while pregnant!--and like everyone else they have the right to expect other people to mind their own damn business.



Yeah, because alcohol is an extremely important part of life that a pregnant mother just CAN'T (and shouldn't) live without.

Bitch_PhD said:
Silly. If someone is so addicted to alcohol that they can't stop--pregnant or otherwise--then expecting them to be 100% compliant with a birth control regimen is ludicrous. Even leaving aside the fact that all birth control regimens fail sometimes, even with perfect use.



Why is it ever ludicrous to expect someone to use birth control? It's really not fucking difficult. Condoms are cheap, easy to find, and you don't need a prescription. It's really not difficult, and I've been completely wasted many a time and still remembered and managed to operate a condom.



I hate playing circle jerk, but I'm glad I'm not the only one that sees the flaws here. Makes me feel like less of a douchebag. But just slightly. This applies to everyone else in this thread that has their heads screwed on straight. *cough*

PatrickY

PatrickY

Vancouver, WA
December 2003

FEB 20, 2007 05:45 PM

unravled said:
DRINKING TOO MUCH WATER CAN KILL YOU, FYI.



That isn't important right now.

What's important is that you, and all women, realize THE HARM A SIMPLE BRA CAN MANAGE.

Think about it.

Bitch_PhD

Bitch_PhD

I'm lost
February 2007

FEB 20, 2007 06:03 PM

In the United States, many doctors as well as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) claim that it is best that pregnant women not drink any alcohol.

Indeed. And this is because many doctors officially think that it's best to err on the side of excessive caution, because patients--women patients especially--can't be trusted to act on actual fact-based information. Saying "doctors will tell you not to drink" does not mean that "one drink causes harm." Can you really not see the distinction?

As to your larger argument--women have to breathe and leave the house, but they don't "have" to drink--yeah, well, there are a lot of things people don't *have* to do that, nonetheless, they want to do and are entitled to do and shouldn't be guilt-tripped out of doing for no good reason. Tell you what. Go ahead and give up everything you don't *have* to do in order to stay alive, and then maybe you'll be in a position to lecture other people.

DyeWhiteGirls

DyeWhiteGirls

Madison, WI
December 2003

FEB 20, 2007 06:17 PM

I can't be bothered to bang my head against this wall anymore. I'm obviously not going to change your mind and my mind is certainly not going to change, so we'll just have to agree to disagree.

Zilchtastic

Zilchtastic

USA
November 2004

FEB 20, 2007 06:21 PM

Bitch_PhD said:
In the United States, many doctors as well as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) claim that it is best that pregnant women not drink any alcohol.

Indeed. And this is because many doctors officially think that it's best to err on the side of excessive caution, because patients--women patients especially--can't be trusted to act on actual fact-based information. Saying "doctors will tell you not to drink" does not mean that "one drink causes harm." Can you really not see the distinction?

As to your larger argument--women have to breathe and leave the house, but they don't "have" to drink--yeah, well, there are a lot of things people don't *have* to do that, nonetheless, they want to do and are entitled to do and shouldn't be guilt-tripped out of doing for no good reason. Tell you what. Go ahead and give up everything you don't *have* to do in order to stay alive, and then maybe you'll be in a position to lecture other people.




Heh! I'd never give up my beloved pasttimes, hobbies, or junkfoods!

...Unless, of course, I got pregnant and there was a chance it could hurt the baby. Little bit different situation then, I should think. Of course, I'm now on the verge of spouting "WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!" and obviously, that's not going to change your mind. Women can drink when they're pregnant-- so far, no laws say they can't. All we get is a little suggestion on the back of our Smirnoff Ice which, of course, nobody follows anyway, because Hey, it can't be that bad, right? Ingesting a substance that can harm a non-pregnant person surely can't be bad for a pregnant one.

One drink may not cause harm. But I'm thinking most people willing to drink during pregnancy aren't going to have only one over the course of nine months, y'know?

Ascanius

Ascanius

USA
October 2006

FEB 20, 2007 06:27 PM

Hey, bitch_phd, don't take it so bad. We're all just a bunch of "judgemental jackasses", so you should probably just "write us off as pricks."

*Savors the self-contradiction*

DyeWhiteGirls

DyeWhiteGirls

Madison, WI
December 2003

FEB 20, 2007 06:32 PM

Ascanius said:
Hey, bitch_phd, don't take it so bad. We're all just a bunch of "judgemental jackasses", so you should probably just "write us off as pricks."

*Savors the self-contradiction*



Well, I mean...she's right. xD

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

FEB 20, 2007 06:35 PM

This is just getting repetitive

So basically here is my theory

bitch_phd can do whatever she wants with her body, i personally could care less, because it's not affecting me or my unborn child.

BUT! If i am with a woman, and she is carrying my unborn child, i am going to do everything i can possibly to do make her life as easy as pie, however, i kind of "expect" her to realize that she isn't just carrying her baby in her body, she is carrying "our" baby. When my ex-wife was pregnant, she smoked, she quit during the pregnancy, so i quit. She quit drinking, i quit drinking. So with me giving 100% i'd expect her to do the same.

It wasn't easy, i didn't want to do it, and i could of sat there and said "fuck you your the one that is pregnant", but i didn't. Mostly because i cared enough about her and my daughter in her tummy at the time to give up drinking and smoking for 9 months. It wasn't that big a deal.....they're materialistic and self indulgence items if you think about it.

quagmirething

quagmirething

I'm lost
June 2005

FEB 20, 2007 07:36 PM

I'd be interested in a pointer to this evidence that a single drink is playing Russian Roulette.

We can look forward to the day that a woman attempting to use a ski lift will first have to present proof of non-pregnancy tongue

Greybeard

Greybeard

Los Angeles, CA
December 2006

FEB 20, 2007 07:36 PM

I don't think the core issue here is actually Fetal Health.

After all, look at our current dismal record on routine prenatal care, let alone for "problem" pregnancies. Also note our equally dismal record on post-natal care, for both women and children.

The issue is Dominance and Control. We do indeed have a problem with people who would make arbitrary rules for pregnant women, then punish them if they get out of line, rather than provide any useful services and support for those same women and the children that follow.

This may be a bit simple-minded, but it works for me:

Liberals want to build schools and hire teachers.

Conservatives want to build prisons and hire cops.

Unfortunately, both Liberals and Conservatives believe that their Rule Sets are the Best For Everyone.

Too many Liberals are jumping onto the Fitness Fascist bandwagon, all to the most good for the most people, of course.

JenBat

JenBat

Statesboro, GA
June 2004

FEB 20, 2007 08:01 PM

PatrickY said:

unravled said:
DRINKING TOO MUCH WATER CAN KILL YOU, FYI.



That isn't important right now.

What's important is that you, and all women, realize THE HARM A SIMPLE BRA CAN MANAGE.

Think about it.



lmao! Thank you so much for that link. After reading all the various views on these pregnancy rights issues I was left with serious thoughts and pondering my level of humanity cause I was at the point of coming to the conclusion that the world is full of douchebags and who the hell cares what anyone does or doesnt do with their body or children and I hope they all die anyway. But now that I know there is a battle to be fought on the deceptive and deadly bra I have my fighting spirit back! tongue

freshprncebelair

freshprncebelair

Ellicott City, MD
June 2004

FEB 20, 2007 08:03 PM

Bitch_PhD said:
yeah, well, there are a lot of things people don't *have* to do that, nonetheless, they want to do and are entitled to do and shouldn't be guilt-tripped out of doing for no good reason. Tell you what. Go ahead and give up everything you don't *have* to do in order to stay alive, and then maybe you'll be in a position to lecture other people.



If you do selfish things and then brag about them self-righteously, people will consider you a selfish, worthless person. It's just the way the world is.

If I came on here and wrote about sleeping with a different woman every day this past summer unprotected and not getting any STDs, im sure people would have the same issues as they do with your positions (lack of respect towards another person, ignoring the advice of experts without good reason, etc).

burtlo

burtlo

Seattle, WA
May 2004

FEB 20, 2007 08:21 PM

freshprncebelair said:
If I came on here and wrote about sleeping with a different woman every day this past summer unprotected and not getting any STDs, im sure people would have the same issues as they do with your positions (lack of respect towards another person, ignoring the advice of experts without good reason, etc).



It seems everyone takes this argument to excess. In their examples and their ideas of how far pregnant women will go with their drinking.

Women should be allowed to make choices for themselves and for their unborn child. It is best that we not label items with information such as "should not" when facts haven't been gathered to support a "should not." Perhaps it should be reworded that any women looking to drink SHOULD consult their doctor.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 ... 11

Next