• feature
  • FRIDAY DECEMBER 8 2006 12:00 PM

Chris Gore’s Footage Fetishes: The Fountain Explained

Darren Aronofsky’s The Fountain is a film that has been long in the making. Bringing this existential epic from script to screen took more than six years and was a personal obsession for the director who launched his career with Pi at the Sundance Film Festival in 1998. Brad Pitt was so moved by the screenplay, he broke down and cried after getting to page 40 when he called Aronofsky to say that he was definitely “in.”

After scheduling conflicts and delays, Pitt was out and the movie in limbo. With the fate of the film unknown, Warner Bros. enticed the director with other projects to helm including Batman, but Aronofsky remained steadfast in his intention to make The Fountain. Once imagined as a nearly $100 million dollar epic spanning thousands of years, Aronofsky downsized the project to a modest $35 million dollar studio film to get it to the screen—Hugh Jackman came aboard to star alongside Aronofsky’s love in real-life Rachel Weisz and the film was a “go.” The kind of struggle to get a film as unclassifiable as this one to the screen always says something about the creative minds who will not give up on bringing their ideas into reality. And the reactions, as one might expect, have been mixed. (Read on, but be warned—SPOILER: You will die.)


...what is most interesting is not the “story” but the subtext...

Perhaps you’ve read reviews that have attempted to explain the movie’s plot describing it as “...three parallel stories about love, death, spirituality, and the fragility of existence as told through the odyssey taken on by one man in his thousand-year struggle to save the woman he loves.” Sure, it’s about that and much more. But taking a step back from the surface level story synopsis put forth by the studio marketing department, what is most interesting is not the “story” but the subtext and, more importantly, the reactions to the journey by viewers. Some say the film is difficult to understand as Aronofsky tells his non-linear story, sometimes bouncing between the three time periods within the same scene, but for me, it worked. It’s also the kind of movie that requires a second viewing to get the most out of it. The last movie that I felt required this attention was Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind—a movie whose story unfolds backwards.


Aronofsky tells his non-linear story, sometimes bouncing between the three time periods within the same scene...

For myself, I was moved. Put simply, the film is about the acceptance of death and reaching a place where one can think of death as an act of creation, not destruction. Tomas/Tommy/Bald-Future-Yoga-Man (Hugh Jackman) will not accept death and works tirelessly in all three parallel stories to conquer it. Isabel/Izzi/Tree-Woman (Rachel Weisz) has come to terms with death as she accepts her own. We experience the film through the eyes of Tom as he finally learns to accept his own death, becoming one with the universe. It’s somber, odd, engaging, beautiful, and it’s the one film I’ve seen this year that moved me to tears. Call me a sap, but it wasn’t just the experience, but that so rarely does a film as unique as this one come along. But how could anyone be surprised coming from the director behind Pi and Requiem for a Dream?

And my interpretation of the film is the right one…for me. While we all have different reactions to movies based on our experiences, The Fountain is one of those rare movies that acts as a cinematic Rorschach test saying volumes about the individual based on their response. And the experience and each individuals’ reactions to it, no matter how vastly different, are all completely valid.


It's not about medical experiments, conquistadors, life-giving trees or monkeys.

When I discuss movies with friends and colleagues, there’s a consensus measurable on a scale of brilliant to crap, and there is generally agreement about where most films fall on this scale. But The Fountain transcends this as the reactions are so across the board, more than any other film in recent memory. Some say they “love it” while others say they “hate it.” I’m most interested in the opinions of those who disliked it. A good friend well-versed in film was captivated by the imagery but was confused by the subplot involving the use of experimental compounds on monkeys. That plot thread completely threw him off the underlying themes. He was as confounded as the character of Tommy in the film—so driven in his work-life that he fails to notice the importance of life’s moments in the present. And that reaction is completely valid. Having seen The Fountain more than four times now (yes, I get that way when I see a film I truly love) I imagine that my own feelings about it will alter as I see it differently based on where I’m at in my own spiritual growth.


Put simply, the film is about the acceptance of death...

So, I hope that others will be open to experiencing The Fountain multiple times as they struggle to unravel the message(s) they discover for themselves. The benefit is that, along the way, you may find yourself gaining more than just an understanding of a movie, but of yourself.

Gore gone.

Chris_Gore is an author, a filmmaker, the creator of Film Threat, and plans to see The Fountain again.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

Comments
AnchorpersonOnTV

AnchorpersonOnTV

Chicago, IL
April 2006

DEC 08, 2006 12:24 PM

My personal favorite flick of the year tus far... Though Children of Men and Pan's Labyrinth should give it a run for its money.

HorseheadFiddle

HorseheadFiddle

San Diego, CA
October 2004

DEC 08, 2006 12:25 PM

I did not like it, but my brother
and his 2 friends liked it.
We all saw it together a few weeks
ago around Thanksgiving.
I'll elaborate later,
but there were several things that
either annoyed me, pissed me off, or
took me out of the story, however
much I enjoyed the thematic elements
and overall concept.

LAWPRE

LAWPRE

I'm lost
September 2006

DEC 08, 2006 01:09 PM

Gore,
I think that you still missed something. It was not just about death but about the search for meaning in all things as well as accepting (but not being confined by) by our place in the universe. Escaping DEATH is often seen more as escaping our own mortality so that we have all the time in the wordl to accomplish stuff as opposed to not wanting to die. So, by accepting death's place in the world and being comfortable with YOUR limitations, you are better able to enjoy life - rather than just simply live.

Chris_Gore

Chris_Gore

Los Angeles, CA
September 2005

DEC 08, 2006 01:12 PM

LAWPRE said:
Gore,
I think that you still missed something. It was not just about death but about the search for meaning in all things



Yes. I agree with you. In fact, you are right and I am right. That was the point in my piece that I think you might have missed. All of these points are valid and the film certainly contains more messages/meanings/themes than the one I chose to focus on in the piece.

Thanks for adding your own valid interpretation.

Kestrel

Kestrel

Austin, TX
July 2003

DEC 08, 2006 01:16 PM

I've seen it multiple times, as well. It was VERY moving, and absolutely gorgeous.

RogueDrone

RogueDrone

Minneapolis, MN
March 2006

DEC 08, 2006 02:06 PM

This movie skyrocketed to my top five list after a single viewing. If not for the story and the characters and the exquisite beauty of it all, then for the simple fact that I've never seen—or felt, more accurately—film do this to me.

jrave

jrave

Italy
January 2004

DEC 08, 2006 03:18 PM

yikes.....now i have to go see this!

craftygrrl

craftygrrl

Bellingham, WA
July 2006

DEC 08, 2006 05:30 PM

Personally, I thought it was interesting but tried a wee bit too hard for profundity.

StarBelliedBoy

StarBelliedBoy

Philadelphia, PA
December 2003

DEC 08, 2006 05:45 PM

Nothingful said:
I did not like it, but my brother
and his 2 friends liked it.
We all saw it together a few weeks
ago around Thanksgiving.
I'll elaborate later,
but there were several things that
either annoyed me, pissed me off, or
took me out of the story, however
much I enjoyed the thematic elements
and overall concept.



Why is your post blocked like a poem?

Neurospasm

Neurospasm

Santa Clara, UT
August 2006

DEC 09, 2006 01:25 AM

Thanks for the analysis. It seems appropriate to me that a study in obsession followed by a study in self destruction should naturally be followed by an exploration of death. One thing I always love about Aronofsky's work is how much it mirrors certain aspects of my own life. Can't wait to see it...

apesamongus

apesamongus

Atlanta, GA
July 2002

DEC 09, 2006 07:19 AM

I couldn't stop giggling every time Hugh Jackman did his floating buddha stance. He lost me about 3/4 of the way through just like he did with Pi. I think it's my anti-spirituality shining through.

Tornateaux

Tornateaux

Fort Campbell, KY
August 2006

DEC 09, 2006 08:04 AM

My wife and I went to see this over Thanksgiving holiday, and we both enjoyed it immensely. I found myself able to draw many alternate "explinations" for the movie that all seemed to work on multiple levels, not the least of which was the underlying message - death is okay and acceptable. Beautifully filmed, wonderfully acted and a nice underlying message that isn't beaten over the viewers head a la Requim for a Dream.

The only thing that frustrated me about the movie was Jackman's steadfast inability to accept the inevitable. Yes, it's sad to lose someone we love. And being married to the woman of my dreams, I understood his motivation. But sometimes, just sometimes, the greatest gift one can give in the game called love is the acceptance, support, wisdom, and compasion to let your love go. Dignity is a many splendored thing.

Just my 2 cents.

lorq

lorq

Manhattan, KS
March 2004

DEC 09, 2006 08:26 AM

Hi Chris-
While I have some problems with "Filmthreat" in general, you all do hit the target more often than not. As for the Fountain? It gets up there with "solaris" 71 and "Solaris" 02
as terrific, emotional sci-fi films.
What is nice is to see you treating this film with respect, not tossing it off like many of the "I know what I like" crowd..

Thanks for keeping this film under discussion.

Jace

Jace

San Francisco, CA
February 2004

DEC 09, 2006 12:15 PM

I absolutely hated this movie. The concept was great, but the parallel storylines were too similar-but-different to really make any sense but a metaphorical sense. In my opinion he should have stuck to one storyline, or made it clearer that the three storylines were either about the same characters, or all similar to each other but with different characters.

For example: At one point, present-day-Izzy calls present-day-Tommy "my conquistador, always conquering." That was an indication to me that they were indeed the same people as the past-day characters, that they drank from the tree of life and were living forever, but something had gone wrong with Izzy, she was dying, and the conquistador had turned to another version of conquering death (a doctor) to try and save her yet again; this is a great storyline. But then past-day-conquistador drinks from the tree later on in the movie and dies a horrible death.

Another example: When the future-day-yoga-man magically appears in the Mayan temple right before the climax of the battle between the conquistador and the priest, and the priest allows himself to be slaughtered. If these storylines were separate and meant to each be a different illustration of the same point, whatever that point is, how is this overlap explained?

I think the movie is an interesting concept, and it's a significant historical event that hasn't gotten much film attention, but I think the script or perhaps the execution of the script were so convoluted that the potential for goodness is ruined.

5371W

5371W

Elizabethtown, KY
May 2005

DEC 10, 2006 02:58 PM

This movie wasn't even on my radar, but now I really want to go watch it.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next