• commentary
  • MONDAY AUGUST 14 2006 4:00 PM

A World Without Movie Theaters

Imagine a world without movie theaters.

No multiplexes. No arthouses. No way to communally experience a film.

That day may be coming sooner than you think. Each year theatrical box office receipts decline as the DVD becomes the preferred method for audiences to watch movies. And coming up just on the horizon is movies available for download -- which may eventually become the way we all watch films. ("Eventually" meaning once the major studios choose a piracy prevention method that they can all agree upon as well as a cost per download structure acceptable to consumers.)

If the music industry is any indicator, the film industry will soon follow into the download zone. CD sales dropped 7% last year as downloads on iTunes increased. (Itunes passed the one billion music download mark a while back.) Tower Records recently announced that they are closing all of their stores and filing for bankruptcy. This shouldn't surprise anyone as their entire business is built primarily on sales of CDs, which are declining far more rapidly than many are willing to admit.


Where did all the people go... they're busy downloading.

In response to these trends, a recent LA times story has stirred up a bit of controversy. The piece entitled "Far Removed From the Multiplex" by John Horn, asserts that teenagers would rather watch films on their computers than go to the movies. And who can blame them? Going to the movies is expensive (you can buy about two DVDs for the price of one evening at the movies) and the experience is more often miserable due to the increasing number of bad movies, endless commercials and annoying patrons. The piece brings up some interesting facts from a recent survey including:

Nearly half (47%) of respondents ages 12 to 17 say they would watch a movie on a PC, well above the interest in doing the same on a cellphone (11%) or video iPod and similar devices (18%). A similar share of those 21 to 24 said they would watch movies on a computer, although they are much less willing to do the same on a cellphone (6%) or video iPod (7%).

The distaste for the multiplex accelerates as children become young adults; 44% of those ages 21 to 24 are seeing fewer films. The Times/Bloomberg poll findings mirror a recent study by the Motion Picture Assn. of America, which found an even sharper drop-off over a five-year span.


It's a fascinating read and the industry will have to pay attention or suffer the fate of Tower Records. Read the entire piece on the LA Times web site.

So, what do you think about all this?

Will we someday live in a world without movie theaters? What are your thoughts on the current state of moviegoing? And do you watch movies online?

This sounds like a great conversation we can all have over some popcorn and soda.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Comments
RumpusParable

RumpusParable

Copperas Cove, TX
April 2003

OCT 02, 2006 12:14 AM

i still miss the drive-in theater. i'd be very unhappy if there were no indoor theaters left; some films are just so much more enjoyable on the big screen.

it's rare that i ever enter a movie theater anymore due to the quality of pictures and the cost, but there are times that i definitely enjoy going. -for instance, i just went to the special playing of A Nightmare On Elm Street... old film that i know well, but seeing it on the big screen in the theater was great. The Matrix was one that i'm glad i saw first in the theater.

i wish the prices would drop; if they were back to what they were in my teens i'd go as often as i used to... when going to a movie wasn't something you had to check your monthly budget for to see if it was affordable/worth the expense.

but, while i can see the number of movie theaters dropping i doubt they'll disappear anytime soon. until i can fit a screen that size in my home and afford it, there's just nothing to replace seeing some films there.

plus, there is the communal thing. i hate people who interfere with other's enjoyment of a film, but the energy of a polite crowd during a movie can enhance the watching.

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

OCT 02, 2006 12:32 AM

You know, all this talk about insane ticket prices makes me realize how lucky I am living in a metropolitan area that is both big enough to support a wide range of moviegoing options and yet simultaneously small enough/low enough cost of living that tickets aren't about the same price as a DVD..

DannyDMc

DannyDMc

Fargo, ND
July 2003

OCT 02, 2006 12:34 AM


I'm living in it; the nearest movie theater for me is in Anchorage, a 3 hour flight from me with one connection. grrrrrr. It almost hurts me more than the fact that the lack of beer in this village. I'm a huge theater rat; I LOVE going to the movies and have since High School.

RudieCantFail

RudieCantFail

I'm lost
January 2006

OCT 02, 2006 12:42 AM

Reasons to go to movie theatre to see a movie:
Gets you out of the house.

Reasons to stay home and watch same movie on DVD:
More cost effective.
No other noisy or otherwise bothersome movie patrons to disturb my viewing.
I can fast forward through all of the annoying trailers.
I can drink beer at home.
I can pause the movie when I have to take a piss.

Eternalxile

Eternalxile

Irving, TX
March 2003

OCT 02, 2006 08:57 AM

I couldnt live in a world without theatres. Yeah, i know most of the movies suck, snacks are overpriced and teenagers and crying kids ruin a movie. But a few changes have fixed all that. 1st off, i sneak in my own snacks. I despise popcorn but i cant get enough twizzlers which cost 1.09 from the gas station. Ive also decided to see only movies worth watching on a big screen. Movies that are big on special effects that you cant get the same experience from out of a computer or a dvd. When Transformers and Spider-man 3 come out next year you can bet your ass im gonna be in a theatre. Ive also noticed that talkative teeny-boppers and couples with crying kids dont see plot driven films like Syriana.

I personally dont like to download movies off of the internet. It's not because of the illegality of it all, its just that it takes so goddam long and the results are iffy at best. Case in point, last year i downloaded Spider-man2. It took about a week to download and when i played it, the fuckin thing was in SPANISH. Exhibit B - The Ringer. This little gem took my only 4 days off of bit torrent but when i played it there was no audio whatsoever. The only movie to download and play without a hitch was Silent Hill. And i dont feel bad about that because i had already paid to see it in the theatre.

If nothing else the recent trend of horrid films coming out has inspired me to make my own films. While i am still a budding artist my first works may not be the next Memento and might suck out loud. But at least mine will suck on purpose in the same way as Roger Corman, Ed Wood and the Troma group have before me. Unlike BloodRayne and Land of the Dead which sucked accidentally.

Coliwali

Coliwali

I'm lost
February 2003

OCT 03, 2006 12:47 AM

malkav11 said:

Coliwali said:
If you are willing to shell out the cash you can get a home theater that may not be quite as high quality but is infinitely more flexible. Looking at the trends in price and quality of home theater systems over the past few years, the Cineplex's won't have the quality advantage for much longer either. Heck, the price of a home theater is going to continue to drop too. Movie theaters aren't innovating and home theater is, unless the Cineplex can offer me an experience that I can't get at home I won't go out.



For 4.50 I can see a movie on UltraScreen with some of the most badass sound on the face of the planet.

There is no way I can even approach that at home, let alone get the equipment for anywhere near the price. It's not like I see a movie every day...maybe 20 a year, maybe a bit more or less depending on the quality of the movies coming out.




Well, you're not comparing the right things. $4.50 for a movie ticket vs $3000 for a home projector and sound system, the movie ticket wins. Sure. But that's not the decision you need to look at. People who are trying to figure out what their general purpose home entertainment system will be can choice between $3000 bucks for a big screen HDTV plus sound system vs $3000 bucks for a home projector plus nice sound system. Both solutions let you play videogames, watch TV, surf the web and watch movies. The folks who go projector get a system which is say, 75% as good as a movie theater. But for a good number of people who do get the full projector setup the loss of 25% isn't worth the exorbinate ticket price or putting up with movie ruining yokels. The home entertainment system is a cost people will be paying for regardless of movie watching potential, because they will still need it to watch TV and play video games. So the costs of going out or staying in becomes $9.50 + theater crap vs getting the latest netflicks movie out of the mailbox. I don't think the difference in fidelity is enough to get people out.

Sure home theater isn't a standard by any means, but the prices are decreasing rapidly and the quality is increasing across the board. The comparative advantages of a Cineplex are going away, the advantage may be there now, but it won't be there for many more years, unless the big theaters start offering a better product.

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

OCT 03, 2006 02:46 AM

But I'm not and probably never will be looking at spending thousands of dollars on a home theater, and there is no comparison between even the dinky theaters and the 20-something inch TV and its built-in speakers that I actually have.

And you've never seen the UltraScreen. There isn't a home system even 50% as good on the market for the regular consumer. Really rich people might be able to establish an actual home theater, but they hardly count.

(And I mean millionaire level rich, not just people who could afford HDTV when it came out.)

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

OCT 03, 2006 12:22 PM

I'm not going to lie, if I had the money to blow on a 60 inch TV and surround sound and a giant couch, I probably would very rarely go to the theater. As it is, I go about once a month, but that's only because I got my local chain's VIP card for Christmas, so all my movies are $5 plus free popcorn plus passes for previews about once a month.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next