• news
  • FRIDAY APRIL 27 2007 6:00 PM

Calls After Midnight: Kurt Cobain Reached Out to Iggy Pop



Before his death in 1994, Kurt Cobain once placed a late night call to Stooges frontman Iggy Pop and left the wiley singer a message asking if the pair could team up sometime soon for a studio collaboration. Pop claims he made repeated attempts to contact the Nirvana frontman but to no avail.

The 60-year-old says, "He called me up once at two in the morning. But this was when I was old enough to start going to bed at 9:30. When I’m not gigging I’m sensible so I didn’t take his call.

"It was cool because it was a great musician at his peak and he’s going, ‘Iggy, this is Kurt Cobain, let’s get in the studio man.’ "So he leaves me a number for the Four Seasons in Beverly Hills. And then every time I would call it was like, ‘Mr. Cobain is under the bed,’ or ‘We haven’t heard from Mr. Cobain in three days.’"


Talk about a missed opportunity...

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 ... 11

Next

Comments
lil_tuffy

lil_tuffy

MODERATOR

San Francisco, CA

APR 28, 2007 04:05 PM

masterfrederick said:
What he accomplished was to showcase the gullibility of the adolescent mind. Nothing-the-fuck more. One could waste their entire adolescence attempting to translate the earshit he spewed forth to common english, and attempting to find the "deeper meaning" all teens seek in order to make themselves seem more intelligent. That was how he became a success. Making stoner kids try to think. And they fooled themselved into thinking they had an answer. real fucking profound. Last guy who pulled that off? L. Ron Hubbard. Real fucking groundbreaking there, folks.



He didn't do that. His record company did.

masterfrederick

masterfrederick

Beaverton, OR
November 2006

APR 28, 2007 04:12 PM

magpieboy said:

Can you please accept that some extremely good music might NOT have more than three chords or lyrics that are not gibberish?



...No.
biggrin

masterfrederick

masterfrederick

Beaverton, OR
November 2006

APR 28, 2007 04:15 PM

ziggycash said:

magpieboy said:

masterfrederick said:
No, I just think that music can have more than three chords, more than absolute gibberish induced by excessive drug use.(Yes, I admit and accept that most of the musicians producing albums in the world today are using drugs, but rarely has the excessive use of said drugs been more apparent in music than with Cobain.) The only way you'd be able to use Cobain's lyrics in a doctoral thesis is if the thesis were on the impact of drugs on the creative mind. That's already been done: Dr. Seuss was one of the subjects studied.



Can you please accept that some extremely good music might NOT have more than three chords or lyrics that are not gibberish? The fact that that gibberish got such a huge rise out of people speaks to its power. So do those three chords. They fucking sound good. While I agree that complex music may be more interesting to listen to most of the time, someone banging on a drum in a simple rhythm can make me break a sweat. One of most amazing things in music is when, say, a simple three-chord pop song actually comes all the way around the circuit and you realize it's been MADE THAT WAY ON PURPOSE, because in its simplicity is something beautiful. Not sure if Kurt was coming all the way around, but the music makes me think so.





being a fan of music of all forms i find that overly complex music can become pretencious, and for some reason the response in every musical generation is a complex vs a simple return. its a constant musical struggle. and when the complex stuff gets to be too much good old fashioned simple garage band music comes back into play. why else would the strokes have made it other than it's simple good rocking music. three chords will always be the answer to overthought music. like yin and yang they somehow balance each other out




You're right that overly complex music can suck too. Take a lot of the techno and trance that's out these days. Sounds like it's right out of a video game. There's such a thing as a happy medium.

masterfrederick

masterfrederick

Beaverton, OR
November 2006

APR 28, 2007 04:16 PM

lil_tuffy said:

masterfrederick said:
What he accomplished was to showcase the gullibility of the adolescent mind. Nothing-the-fuck more. One could waste their entire adolescence attempting to translate the earshit he spewed forth to common english, and attempting to find the "deeper meaning" all teens seek in order to make themselves seem more intelligent. That was how he became a success. Making stoner kids try to think. And they fooled themselved into thinking they had an answer. real fucking profound. Last guy who pulled that off? L. Ron Hubbard. Real fucking groundbreaking there, folks.



He didn't do that. His record company did.




I do believe he wrote his own lyrics, did he not? How did he not do it? Aside from his record company continuing to publish his albums, that is.

lil_tuffy

lil_tuffy

MODERATOR

San Francisco, CA

APR 28, 2007 04:32 PM

masterfrederick said:

lil_tuffy said:

masterfrederick said:
What he accomplished was to showcase the gullibility of the adolescent mind. Nothing-the-fuck more. One could waste their entire adolescence attempting to translate the earshit he spewed forth to common english, and attempting to find the "deeper meaning" all teens seek in order to make themselves seem more intelligent. That was how he became a success. Making stoner kids try to think. And they fooled themselved into thinking they had an answer. real fucking profound. Last guy who pulled that off? L. Ron Hubbard. Real fucking groundbreaking there, folks.



He didn't do that. His record company did.




I do believe he wrote his own lyrics, did he not? How did he not do it? Aside from his record company continuing to publish his albums, that is.



I don't know man. I don't think your opinion is simplistic enough.

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

APR 28, 2007 04:33 PM

masterfrederick said:


3, and one non-Christmas, but thanks for playing.


Actually, they have 4 albums, and only one isn't Christmas related. Truly, a terrible band. Sorry. If you think that Trans-Siberian Orchestra is an example of music that isn't totally pre-packaged (3 fucking Christmas albums!) you really have NO business ever talking about music.

Is anything that you've said in this thread correct? Heck, I'm not even a big Cobain fan, I just think it's fucking laughable that you're so clueless that your retorts are basically "you wanna suck Cobain's dick" because you don't have anything intelligent to say.

masterfrederick

masterfrederick

Beaverton, OR
November 2006

APR 28, 2007 05:03 PM

PointBlank said:

masterfrederick said:


3, and one non-Christmas, but thanks for playing.


Actually, they have 4 albums, and only one isn't Christmas related. Truly, a terrible band. Sorry. If you think that Trans-Siberian Orchestra is an example of music that isn't totally pre-packaged (3 fucking Christmas albums!) you really have NO business ever talking about music.

Is anything that you've said in this thread correct? Heck, I'm not even a big Cobain fan, I just think it's fucking laughable that you're so clueless that your retorts are basically "you wanna suck Cobain's dick" because you don't have anything intelligent to say.



Sorry, I thought you understood that I meant they had 3 Christmas and one non- but I see now that I should have been a touch more clear. My bad. Try this on for size: I propose that it took more thought and imagination to pull off what they did than what Nirvana churned out. Funny how "pre-packaged" means it takes ten years to get 3 albums out. Oh, and one non-Christmas album, let's not forget that... Whereas Nirvana churned out how many nice, wonderful steaming piles? In how long?

Now it falls to you to answer this: Is anything I have said INCORRECT, given the nature of what an opinion actually is? Prove it. Otherwise it all boils down to us simply having to agree to disagree here. Your opinion isn't going to change because of anything I've said (Which is fine since it was never my intent to sway anyone's view.) and mine's not changing either (Which if you thought it would, sorry. Play again when there're better prizes.) so if I am not mistaken it's all a moot point, right? That's the beautiful thing about all this-- IT'S ALL A MATTER OF OPINION.

PatrickY

PatrickY

Vancouver, WA
December 2003

APR 28, 2007 06:58 PM

masterfrederick said:

PointBlank said:

masterfrederick said:


3, and one non-Christmas, but thanks for playing.


Actually, they have 4 albums, and only one isn't Christmas related. Truly, a terrible band. Sorry. If you think that Trans-Siberian Orchestra is an example of music that isn't totally pre-packaged (3 fucking Christmas albums!) you really have NO business ever talking about music.

Is anything that you've said in this thread correct? Heck, I'm not even a big Cobain fan, I just think it's fucking laughable that you're so clueless that your retorts are basically "you wanna suck Cobain's dick" because you don't have anything intelligent to say.



Sorry, I thought you understood that I meant they had 3 Christmas and one non- but I see now that I should have been a touch more clear. My bad. Try this on for size: I propose that it took more thought and imagination to pull off what they did than what Nirvana churned out. Funny how "pre-packaged" means it takes ten years to get 3 albums out. Oh, and one non-Christmas album, let's not forget that... Whereas Nirvana churned out how many nice, wonderful steaming piles? In how long?

Now it falls to you to answer this: Is anything I have said INCORRECT, given the nature of what an opinion actually is? Prove it. Otherwise it all boils down to us simply having to agree to disagree here. Your opinion isn't going to change because of anything I've said (Which is fine since it was never my intent to sway anyone's view.) and mine's not changing either (Which if you thought it would, sorry. Play again when there're better prizes.) so if I am not mistaken it's all a moot point, right? That's the beautiful thing about all this-- IT'S ALL A MATTER OF OPINION.



I suppose the real question is why you chose to express your opinion in the manner of a homeless nutter shrieking the world's least needed manifesto at an uncaring sky.

wildswan

wildswan

I'm lost
June 2006

APR 28, 2007 07:03 PM

^^^ Holy shit! That's genius!

masterfrederick

masterfrederick

Beaverton, OR
November 2006

APR 28, 2007 07:11 PM

PatrickY said:

masterfrederick said:

PointBlank said:

masterfrederick said:


3, and one non-Christmas, but thanks for playing.


Actually, they have 4 albums, and only one isn't Christmas related. Truly, a terrible band. Sorry. If you think that Trans-Siberian Orchestra is an example of music that isn't totally pre-packaged (3 fucking Christmas albums!) you really have NO business ever talking about music.

Is anything that you've said in this thread correct? Heck, I'm not even a big Cobain fan, I just think it's fucking laughable that you're so clueless that your retorts are basically "you wanna suck Cobain's dick" because you don't have anything intelligent to say.



Sorry, I thought you understood that I meant they had 3 Christmas and one non- but I see now that I should have been a touch more clear. My bad. Try this on for size: I propose that it took more thought and imagination to pull off what they did than what Nirvana churned out. Funny how "pre-packaged" means it takes ten years to get 3 albums out. Oh, and one non-Christmas album, let's not forget that... Whereas Nirvana churned out how many nice, wonderful steaming piles? In how long?

Now it falls to you to answer this: Is anything I have said INCORRECT, given the nature of what an opinion actually is? Prove it. Otherwise it all boils down to us simply having to agree to disagree here. Your opinion isn't going to change because of anything I've said (Which is fine since it was never my intent to sway anyone's view.) and mine's not changing either (Which if you thought it would, sorry. Play again when there're better prizes.) so if I am not mistaken it's all a moot point, right? That's the beautiful thing about all this-- IT'S ALL A MATTER OF OPINION.



I suppose the real question is why you chose to express your opinion in the manner of a homeless nutter shrieking the world's least needed manifesto at an uncaring sky.



Welcome to free speech. The fact of the matter is that one can express their opinion in any manner they wish. I have endured the childish slings and arrows of the other people in this thread (with one guy even threatening to beat me with a crowbar), just as I have slung my own opinion out there for others to read. We are all entitled to disagree. Funny how that works, eh? Like magic, really.

Your opinion: I'm a nutter and I'm wrong about Cobain sucking. My opinion: I'm right, and he did in fact suck. Simple as that. Where do you get that my opinion is some sort of manifesto?

Girthy

Girthy

Canoga Park, CA
July 2005

APR 28, 2007 07:23 PM

Gahh, fuckin' kernals... *diggs one out of teeth*

Yo, anyone want some of my popcorn?

Anyone, anyone?

PatrickY

PatrickY

Vancouver, WA
December 2003

APR 28, 2007 08:06 PM

masterfrederick said:
Welcome to free speech. The fact of the matter is that one can express their opinion in any manner they wish. I have endured the childish slings and arrows of the other people in this thread (with one guy even threatening to beat me with a crowbar), just as I have slung my own opinion out there for others to read. We are all entitled to disagree. Funny how that works, eh? Like magic, really.

Your opinion: I'm a nutter and I'm wrong about Cobain sucking. My opinion: I'm right, and he did in fact suck. Simple as that. Where do you get that my opinion is some sort of manifesto?



This isn't an issue of free speech. It's an issue of behaviour. You have every right to express your opinion, and every right, within the defined parameters of the SG guidelines, to express them in the manner of your choice. What's at issue is the question of why you felt the need to express your opinion in such a belligerent manner to begin with.

In other words, I know you're entitled to act like a jerk if you want to, I'm just at a loss to understand why you'd want to.

And where do I get the idea your opinion is some sort of manifesto? It comes down to one thing again: behaviour. Read your first post. Cobain was a "talentless hack", and a "droolbaby" who was singlehandedly responsible for causing music to "SUCK OUT LOUD for ten years", and who should have "offed himself when Nirvana was still in the garage." This is not a reasonable opinion stated in a reasonable manner, and reads like it's written by someone who has a serious, and unreasonable, amount of emotion invested in the subject.

masterfrederick

masterfrederick

Beaverton, OR
November 2006

APR 28, 2007 08:38 PM

PatrickY said:

masterfrederick said:
Welcome to free speech. The fact of the matter is that one can express their opinion in any manner they wish. I have endured the childish slings and arrows of the other people in this thread (with one guy even threatening to beat me with a crowbar), just as I have slung my own opinion out there for others to read. We are all entitled to disagree. Funny how that works, eh? Like magic, really.

Your opinion: I'm a nutter and I'm wrong about Cobain sucking. My opinion: I'm right, and he did in fact suck. Simple as that. Where do you get that my opinion is some sort of manifesto?



This isn't an issue of free speech. It's an issue of behaviour. You have every right to express your opinion, and every right, within the defined parameters of the SG guidelines, to express them in the manner of your choice. What's at issue is the question of why you felt the need to express your opinion in such a belligerent manner to begin with.

In other words, I know you're entitled to act like a jerk if you want to, I'm just at a loss to understand why you'd want to.

And where do I get the idea your opinion is some sort of manifesto? It comes down to one thing again: behaviour. Read your first post. Cobain was a "talentless hack", and a "droolbaby" who was singlehandedly responsible for causing music to "SUCK OUT LOUD for ten years", and who should have "offed himself when Nirvana was still in the garage." This is not a reasonable opinion stated in a reasonable manner, and reads like it's written by someone who has a serious, and unreasonable, amount of emotion invested in the subject.



One thing all manifestos have in common is that they are in their nature a call to conform to one's beliefs. Where did I say this? Regardless of the way I said it, nowhere in my rants did I say that everyone should believe as I do. Did I? No, I didn't.

Now as to why I said it the way I did, I simply feel that way about the man. Like Ted nugent, I too am glad he is gone. (Ted said he was glad K.C. is dead, not saying Ted is dead. Just clarifying.) You may feel that the amount of emotion I invest in my sentiments regarding this matter to be unreasonable and irrational, I don't. I might think the extent to which people defend their hero here might be a bit irrational too. You and the rest who disagree with me don't see it that way. We simply disagree, regardless of HOW I said it, and regardless of how you all say it. Ever thought about that?

adjunct

adjunct

Philadelphia, PA
July 2002

APR 28, 2007 09:20 PM

A spectre is haunting SG- the spectre of orchestral rock music.

Violare

Violare

Spotsylvania, VA
April 2007

APR 28, 2007 10:21 PM

*Shrug*
I like his music.
He did what he did, got rich, killed himself, shit happens. Sucks.

I think it's sad to read people insulting a dead man.

Tell ya what.

Make your own band, get rich, THEN talk shit about his music.

Peace.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 ... 11

Next