• rumor
  • THURSDAY NOVEMBER 30 2006 8:00 AM

James Bond Actor Wants Some Boy-on-Boy Action



The newest actor to portray James Bond, Daniel Craig, stated the character could use some updating and modernizing. He claimed the best way to do this is to give the notorious ladies man some new proclivities. Craig suggested a gay scene might spice things up.

"I mean, look at (British TV series) Doctor Who—that has had gay scenes in it and no one blinks an eye," he added.


Craig also stated he was fine going full-frontal in the newest Bond installment, Casino Royale.

"Why not? I think in this day and age, fans would have accepted it,"


Um, ok…Was it really your dick, dude? Craig reportedly had a body double for nude scenes.

"I had stunt men all the way. Stunt penises? I've got four or five."


What’s with the stunt penis? Dame Judi Dench claimed you have a gigantic schlong. She caught a glimpse of your junk when she was stalking you outside your trailer.

She revealed: "It's an absolute monster! Maybe I shouldn't have said that. How uncouth of me!"


Oh, Judi! You dirty girl!

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

Comments
SnowgodCCR

SnowgodCCR

Derry, NH
November 2006

NOV 30, 2006 10:37 AM

Well, seeing as Craig is perhaps THE WORST James Bond ever, and that he failed to understand that Casino Royale is a remake of the first Bond movie ever...I don't really care what he thinks should be done with the 007 franchise. I saw the remake the other night and I was sorely dissapointed with it. He's far too muscle bound to pull off being James Bond, and he just comes off as arrogant rather than witty. Never mind the fact that he wasn't using almost any of the standard bond gear, save the Omega and Aston Martin (halfway through the film...finally.) Wheres the PPK? Where's the lasers? Seriously....

thefreak

thefreak

NEWSWIRE

Gardner, MA

NOV 30, 2006 11:12 AM

SnowgodCCR said:
Well, seeing as Craig is perhaps THE WORST James Bond ever, and that he failed to understand that Casino Royale is a remake of the first Bond movie ever...I don't really care what he thinks should be done with the 007 franchise. I saw the remake the other night and I was sorely dissapointed with it. He's far too muscle bound to pull off being James Bond, and he just comes off as arrogant rather than witty. Never mind the fact that he wasn't using almost any of the standard bond gear, save the Omega and Aston Martin (halfway through the film...finally.) Wheres the PPK? Where's the lasers? Seriously....



*resists the urge to slap*

-TM

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

NOV 30, 2006 11:29 AM

FridgeMagnet said:
I agree. I've always wanted to write a "tough guy" crime movie in which the lead bad ass is bisexual. Would make for some interesting sub plots. I've never written it because I'm real lazy.



*steals yr idea*

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

NOV 30, 2006 11:30 AM

well, there were a couple of gay henchmen...

Lycoris

Lycoris

Toronto, ON
October 2005

NOV 30, 2006 11:43 AM

This would make me want to see a Bond movie. love

quagmirething

quagmirething

I'm lost
June 2005

NOV 30, 2006 11:55 AM

Sounds a delightful idea. I hated the way the series went. The Brosnan films were unwatchably silly.

*slaps SnowgodCCR*

Vestril

Vestril

Coronado, CA
February 2003

NOV 30, 2006 12:41 PM

SnowgodCCR said:
Well, seeing as Craig is perhaps THE WORST James Bond ever, and that he failed to understand that Casino Royale is a remake of the first Bond movie ever...I don't really care what he thinks should be done with the 007 franchise. I saw the remake the other night and I was sorely dissapointed with it. He's far too muscle bound to pull off being James Bond, and he just comes off as arrogant rather than witty. Never mind the fact that he wasn't using almost any of the standard bond gear, save the Omega and Aston Martin (halfway through the film...finally.) Wheres the PPK? Where's the lasers? Seriously....



This is dreadfully off topic, but:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
Casino Royale wasn't the first Bond movie, unless I'm missing something. There was a TV special in '54, maybe that's what you're thinking of. If you are, and you were hoping for this to be a faithful remake--that's stupid, as that wasn't particularly good. As far as your complaints about this Bond's lack of refinement--I guess we weren't watching the same movie. In the one I watched he was a developing character, transitioning from rough and unsophisticated to a bit more classy. In the end of the movie he was doing his hunting in a suit and had the classic Bond line. I suspect you'll be more impressed with the next one.

Frankly I think calling this a remake is a bit silly. It wasn't, really--the only other Casino Royale movie was a spoof.


geekgurl

geekgurl

Philadelphia, PA
June 2003

NOV 30, 2006 12:54 PM

That would be hot.

sulares

sulares

Sebastian, FL
April 2006

NOV 30, 2006 01:25 PM

I look at the possibility of a gay or bi Bond as very possible. Though if it happened I would prefer him Bisexual. Double 0's have a short life span, so new Bonds are possible. You dont retire the number because the player leaves the game, can you imagine James Bond 00124. The number and moniker are issued to the next person to be promoted to that spot. The past is erased and you dress into a history premade to bring terror to a villian who has heard the name and number. Well this is how I see it.

To be honest I hope they shed the PG13 rating and go for broke as rated R and make the films better then the eye candy fluff that has pervaded the series since Roger Moore took over for George Lazenby.

Affy

Affy

Chicago, IL
March 2006

NOV 30, 2006 01:31 PM

I dont care, the new bond is hot. I'd do him in a heartbeat.

pb

pb

USA
December 2003

NOV 30, 2006 02:20 PM

i'm going to go out on an SG limb here and say, no, that would not be a good way to go with the whole Bond thing.

Targeted

Targeted

Willsboro, NY
June 2006

NOV 30, 2006 03:25 PM

Affy said:
I dont care, the new bond is hot. I'd do him in a heartbeat.



I'm straight, but I think I can make a an exception and say "me too."

Dogslife

dogslife

Toronto, ON
April 2003

NOV 30, 2006 03:55 PM

SnowgodCCR said:
Well, seeing as Craig is perhaps THE WORST James Bond ever, and that he failed to understand that Casino Royale is a remake of the first Bond movie ever...I don't really care what he thinks should be done with the 007 franchise. I saw the remake the other night and I was sorely dissapointed with it. He's far too muscle bound to pull off being James Bond, and he just comes off as arrogant rather than witty. Never mind the fact that he wasn't using almost any of the standard bond gear, save the Omega and Aston Martin (halfway through the film...finally.) Wheres the PPK? Where's the lasers? Seriously....



You obviously know all sorts of things about how movies are made. Please, tell us more.

MikeofEvil2

MikeofEvil2

United Kingdom
September 2003

NOV 30, 2006 04:26 PM

Just for the record, Casino Royale was the first book, not the first movie. The first movie was Dr. No. Casino Royale has been made before as a James Bond spoof with David Niven.

I know a lot of people know this, but I thought some people might not.

Drake

Drake

SUICIDEGIRL

I'm lost

NOV 30, 2006 06:32 PM

SnowgodCCR said:
Well, seeing as Craig is perhaps THE WORST James Bond ever, and that he failed to understand that Casino Royale is a remake of the first Bond movie ever...I don't really care what he thinks should be done with the 007 franchise. I saw the remake the other night and I was sorely dissapointed with it. He's far too muscle bound to pull off being James Bond, and he just comes off as arrogant rather than witty. Never mind the fact that he wasn't using almost any of the standard bond gear, save the Omega and Aston Martin (halfway through the film...finally.) Wheres the PPK? Where's the lasers? Seriously....



Haha, I think I like all the stuff you hate. smile

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next