What a good idea. Really helps people think better of you. Of course half the morons who actually watch the special will think it's a confession documentary.

I think the prosecution already did that for you back during your trial Mr. Simpson.

i can't help but feel like i woke up on the other side of the looking glass.
seriously, WHAT THE FUCK? How is this even happening? why is he alive???

The whole premise of this makes absolutely no sense. Why would anybody say how he would've commited the murders? I can't even comprehend the logic behind it. It' slike he's saying, I didn't do it, but I thought long and hard about it.

Aw come on O.J.....I liked you better when you stayed OUT of the limelight.
WHAT THE FUCK...
Why would anyone speculate on how they would carry out a murder of the mother of your children?
He's fucked.

This is kind of interesting. It adds a different dimension to the whole thing. Not sure how much of it I buy, but it's at least a little thought-provoking.

Father of the Year I say...

I'm glad Fox is clearing this up. Cuz the way it really happened was stupid. I imagine OJ will say shit like , " I didn't quite cut her head off...i mean.....uh...the person that really killed her, that is.....Now, I would have cut her head completely off in one cut. ..."

But who's the one who's really fucked up ? Fox

This puts a cherry on top of what we already know, that Rupert Murdoch is Satan.

oj didnt do it...

It is time to tell FOX that they have gone beyond trash finally.

Clog their phone lines. Send them E-mails. Let them know they screwed up one more time.

Isn't this absolute fucking madness? If someone had told me a few months ago that OJ Simpson would be retarded enough to go public with 'hypothetical' descriptions of the murders he was found guilty of (in a civil court, anyway), I wouldn't believe them. Jesus, he's so mental.

I think it would be fucking hilarious if all the book contained was evidence and testimony from the prosecution.

will he HYPOTHETICALLY tell us where the bloody clothes are?

i still can't wrap my head around this.

forensic evidence info tidbit...

luminol is a chemical substance used to illuminate dna(saliva, semen, blood, etc), it was used in ojs house & his bronco i believe. there were no traces of blood which matched nicole simpson or ron goldman in the house. the bronco had small smudges of blood which carried dna from all 3(oj, nicole & ron). the amount of blood spilled on the scene would lead any reasonable officer(& person) to believe that there was a tremendous amount blood lifted from the scene & carried away by the perpetrator. this is a fact proven time & time again that we all deposit dna everywhere we go throughout the course of our day, as well as carry something away from where we have been. dna, such as blood & semen do not simply just wash away. they remain present long after many attempts to remove them...blood especially. blood will remain detectable to cadaver dogs & luminol even as long as a decade later masked under paint & cleaning solutions.

oj would have carried more than enough blood away from the scene to deposit it in his vehicle & he would have tracked it into his house. he did not have the time to clean himself anywhere else because the timeline proves that(time of the murders til the time oj was alleged to have walked into his front door as seen by the limo driver). ron goldman had offensive wounds on his hands. this means that he was fighting back. oj had no visible bruising & ron goldman had none of ojs dna on his hands. oj could not have committed the murders. does he know who did it? most definitely.

looking at the evidence, combined with my 18 yrs as a police officer, i can deduce that oj didnt do it but is definitely covering for whomever did. that could possibly, in my book, be his eldest son...jason.

btw...i really do believe that oj is in need of mental evaluation.