A little final fantasy remix I decided to do instead of transcribing papers... If you are old school OG Final fantasy individual, you may appreciate its nostalgia.
Life goes on
Life goes on
Lots of crap in life, my grandma is on edge of passing on, graduate degree sucks all my free time, work responsibilities are amplifying x10 as of last week. Christmas makes me broke, and congressional GOP keeps scapegoating cuze im federal employee and thats stress too... anyways, cant wait for new years.
So all of you still here? Strange, thought the rapture was happening today... Oh yeah, us Suicide homies are way too corrupt, sinful, and basically awesome to be sucked away by some spiritual event 7 millennium in the making ^_~
Wanted to share an article about public perception that has been bugging the shit out of me.
But before you attack me with poltiics and social perspective on the article I share, please understand that I was punk rock stalker and roadie in OC from 15 to 20. I eventually needed to survive so my life switched direction and I sold out. Selling out turned out not to be a bad deal at all. They pay for my school up to my masters, and they guaranteed my home loan.... Getting off track, basically I may wear a suit and work for the feds but I am still the same fucked up, spaztastic libertarian rebel that I have always been. The meassge of punk and the refusal to be opressed will always flow within me... and that's why you should be happy to have undercover badasses working for the government--no--not espianoge, but me slowly indoctrinating my culture and strange pesonality into the pinnacle of government power ^_^
With that ramble out of the way--This guy says everything that i've been feeling/thinking last couple moneths about how federal employees are getting shafted. Many of the civil employees are ex servicemembers are and extremely disciplined...they also care about their mission to serve the american population. Bah, I sound political ... whateever though--- Me venting:::
numerous articles, blogs and comments sections I have been consuming, there is one person who is almost always a leading player in any account of the federal workforce. It's gotten to the point where, whenever I'm reading another piece about public workers, I await this player's entrance. It can be a subtle appearance, a sentence or two hidden among the accounts, or the full-blown lead, screaming in the opening.
I'm referring to the under- or non-performing public employee.
Who is this person?
It's almost as if there is a requirement, when writing about government employees, to mention that certain feds aren't doing the work. I imagine it was collectively bargained at one point: "OK, we'll give you full medical with dental, and a solid pension, but whenever you talk or write about government workplaces, you have to include at least two sentences acknowledging underperforming workers. Let me know if you'd like to use our template."
It comes across as an agencywide insecurity: "Yes, we accomplished A, B and C. Would anyone like to see pictures of our underperformers?" You could be writing about an agency that has found a cure for cancer while putting out wildfires as it negotiated a Middle East peace deal, but you still must mention that, of course, there were underperforming employees involved.
Is this an accurate picture? How have underperforming employees become representative of the public workplace as a whole? Do these caricatures – the lava-lamp employee at the post office, the over-caffeinated snarler at the DMV, the teacher who is out of the parking lot before the kids are on the bus – really represent the public employee community?
I found a statistic (sorry, this was the most recent I could come up with) stating that, in 1999, the Office of Personnel Management estimated that underperforming employees comprised approximately 3.7 percent of the federal workforce. Allowing for COLA-level growth (or undergrowth), that is still a small number to be so representative of the entire workforce. So how and why are they the face? (And how do you come up with estimate of underperforming employees? Do you send out a questionnaire and figure that anyone who has the time to answer must be a slacker?)
It's not that there isn't a problem here. As discussions about how to make government more efficient continue, one of the topics constantly visited is how to best compensate public employees, with a focus on how to implement a pay-for-performance system.
The problem seems to be systemic. There are numerous anecdotes of management being unable to follow a simple process for employee evaluations. Online comments tell of employees who feel that their managers don't give proper performance reviews, and managers tell of having their hands tied when trying to deal with underperforming employees.
Is the problem merely human interaction? A group of people working on high-cost projects in a stressed-out economy with heated partisan oversight – I'm pretty sure this would qualify as one of those lab tests where the rats start eating each other. Which, if you follow reader comments, is a pretty accurate metaphor for what is going on.
Maybe we need to better identify the underperformers, in order to let everyone know how little their numbers are? I suggest giving underperformers special seating in office spaces, meeting rooms and cafeterias – and perhaps requiring them to wear color-coded clothes or IDs – so that everyone can get a better idea of how small this group actually is.
Great, another project that the other 95-plus percent public workers will have to take care of.
But before you attack me with poltiics and social perspective on the article I share, please understand that I was punk rock stalker and roadie in OC from 15 to 20. I eventually needed to survive so my life switched direction and I sold out. Selling out turned out not to be a bad deal at all. They pay for my school up to my masters, and they guaranteed my home loan.... Getting off track, basically I may wear a suit and work for the feds but I am still the same fucked up, spaztastic libertarian rebel that I have always been. The meassge of punk and the refusal to be opressed will always flow within me... and that's why you should be happy to have undercover badasses working for the government--no--not espianoge, but me slowly indoctrinating my culture and strange pesonality into the pinnacle of government power ^_^
With that ramble out of the way--This guy says everything that i've been feeling/thinking last couple moneths about how federal employees are getting shafted. Many of the civil employees are ex servicemembers are and extremely disciplined...they also care about their mission to serve the american population. Bah, I sound political ... whateever though--- Me venting:::
numerous articles, blogs and comments sections I have been consuming, there is one person who is almost always a leading player in any account of the federal workforce. It's gotten to the point where, whenever I'm reading another piece about public workers, I await this player's entrance. It can be a subtle appearance, a sentence or two hidden among the accounts, or the full-blown lead, screaming in the opening.
I'm referring to the under- or non-performing public employee.
Who is this person?
It's almost as if there is a requirement, when writing about government employees, to mention that certain feds aren't doing the work. I imagine it was collectively bargained at one point: "OK, we'll give you full medical with dental, and a solid pension, but whenever you talk or write about government workplaces, you have to include at least two sentences acknowledging underperforming workers. Let me know if you'd like to use our template."
It comes across as an agencywide insecurity: "Yes, we accomplished A, B and C. Would anyone like to see pictures of our underperformers?" You could be writing about an agency that has found a cure for cancer while putting out wildfires as it negotiated a Middle East peace deal, but you still must mention that, of course, there were underperforming employees involved.
Is this an accurate picture? How have underperforming employees become representative of the public workplace as a whole? Do these caricatures – the lava-lamp employee at the post office, the over-caffeinated snarler at the DMV, the teacher who is out of the parking lot before the kids are on the bus – really represent the public employee community?
I found a statistic (sorry, this was the most recent I could come up with) stating that, in 1999, the Office of Personnel Management estimated that underperforming employees comprised approximately 3.7 percent of the federal workforce. Allowing for COLA-level growth (or undergrowth), that is still a small number to be so representative of the entire workforce. So how and why are they the face? (And how do you come up with estimate of underperforming employees? Do you send out a questionnaire and figure that anyone who has the time to answer must be a slacker?)
It's not that there isn't a problem here. As discussions about how to make government more efficient continue, one of the topics constantly visited is how to best compensate public employees, with a focus on how to implement a pay-for-performance system.
The problem seems to be systemic. There are numerous anecdotes of management being unable to follow a simple process for employee evaluations. Online comments tell of employees who feel that their managers don't give proper performance reviews, and managers tell of having their hands tied when trying to deal with underperforming employees.
Is the problem merely human interaction? A group of people working on high-cost projects in a stressed-out economy with heated partisan oversight – I'm pretty sure this would qualify as one of those lab tests where the rats start eating each other. Which, if you follow reader comments, is a pretty accurate metaphor for what is going on.
Maybe we need to better identify the underperformers, in order to let everyone know how little their numbers are? I suggest giving underperformers special seating in office spaces, meeting rooms and cafeterias – and perhaps requiring them to wear color-coded clothes or IDs – so that everyone can get a better idea of how small this group actually is.
Great, another project that the other 95-plus percent public workers will have to take care of.
I am totally going to eat someone's brains... it probably will raise my already orbital IQ. Fuck yeah. I own shit.
This is a retro trancy/housy ode to nintendo era music.
Haha, ok so everyone hates underground hip hop, i'll be careful with posting more recordings/productions of that discipline. On a good note, I spent that whole weekend learning to use my friends Axion 25 (2nd gen) midi sampler/sound board.
I hooked it up to my PC with the USB digital MIDI in/MIDI out controller and loaded up the drivers in fruity loops to mess with it. You can link every element of control and samles from the software directly to the board. That meant plugins with modulation, channel setting, and synthetic keyboard riffs are a breeze cause you can do it so much qucker. I need to take Piano classes now to be better.
Anyway, the main track was produced by using synth channels, samples, key/tempo changes and lucky layering. I put that main beat into a sample channel so I could fuck with it while I recorded it. A lot of the extra stuff you hear in it is done all on the fly.
I recorded this for my friend who owned the board but never learned to use it, so the free software shit and the fucked up kick overs are excusable (I djed for 5 years but never messed with a midi samplers controls).
Haha, ok so everyone hates underground hip hop, i'll be careful with posting more recordings/productions of that discipline. On a good note, I spent that whole weekend learning to use my friends Axion 25 (2nd gen) midi sampler/sound board.
I hooked it up to my PC with the USB digital MIDI in/MIDI out controller and loaded up the drivers in fruity loops to mess with it. You can link every element of control and samles from the software directly to the board. That meant plugins with modulation, channel setting, and synthetic keyboard riffs are a breeze cause you can do it so much qucker. I need to take Piano classes now to be better.
Anyway, the main track was produced by using synth channels, samples, key/tempo changes and lucky layering. I put that main beat into a sample channel so I could fuck with it while I recorded it. A lot of the extra stuff you hear in it is done all on the fly.
I recorded this for my friend who owned the board but never learned to use it, so the free software shit and the fucked up kick overs are excusable (I djed for 5 years but never messed with a midi samplers controls).
FEBRUARY 2013
JANUARY 2013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
DECEMBER 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
NOVEMBER 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
