This Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a smart guy. I heard he looks like a monkey but he has understood some important facts:
First he showed some days ago:
1. Elections are cool. All the hip 1st world nations have them.
2. Bad thing is, that you need to have someone trustable, who counts the votes. Mahmoud found a really smart solutions for this: He just did the counting himself.
And when his opponents said, they would like to check this he said: No. It's mine. Of course he was offended, how dare these people not to trust him, when he sais, that after counting it shows, he has won.
They were not stopping and it looks like he then finally alowed them to have a look.
I can only imagine, that many of the voting papers looked like "I vote for this hansome Mr Ahmadinejad. And I swear that I totally filled out that paper myself during the election. - Anonymous voter."
But that was not convincing enough for these people either. Seriously, what are they thinking?
But the smart Mahmoud knows another thing.
3. Violence creates violence.
4. Unless your violence kills the other one DEAD. So dead, he can't be violent anymore.
Now the so called opposition had to be so oposite it really hurt him. I don't know how you see it but I think the idea of shooting them dead is exactly the right responce here. Something that has worked throughout history of stupid dictators.
How this came to bother me? Well, this opposition demonstrated here, too (actually the first to tell me about the first 6 kills and the "demonstraters will be shot" rule). Nice people. Not so smart for Mahmoud, that he can't shoot them here.
First he showed some days ago:
1. Elections are cool. All the hip 1st world nations have them.
2. Bad thing is, that you need to have someone trustable, who counts the votes. Mahmoud found a really smart solutions for this: He just did the counting himself.
And when his opponents said, they would like to check this he said: No. It's mine. Of course he was offended, how dare these people not to trust him, when he sais, that after counting it shows, he has won.
They were not stopping and it looks like he then finally alowed them to have a look.
I can only imagine, that many of the voting papers looked like "I vote for this hansome Mr Ahmadinejad. And I swear that I totally filled out that paper myself during the election. - Anonymous voter."
But that was not convincing enough for these people either. Seriously, what are they thinking?
But the smart Mahmoud knows another thing.
3. Violence creates violence.
4. Unless your violence kills the other one DEAD. So dead, he can't be violent anymore.
Now the so called opposition had to be so oposite it really hurt him. I don't know how you see it but I think the idea of shooting them dead is exactly the right responce here. Something that has worked throughout history of stupid dictators.
How this came to bother me? Well, this opposition demonstrated here, too (actually the first to tell me about the first 6 kills and the "demonstraters will be shot" rule). Nice people. Not so smart for Mahmoud, that he can't shoot them here.
I'm living, because I've got nothing better I could do.
I think that sums up the situation.
I think that sums up the situation.
Things I have learned from Law & Order (and similar shows):
1. If a policemen does something illegal at work, nobody ever brings charge aganst him to the court. Instead, the criminal, he is investigating against at this time, get's a general immunity.
2. A successful lawyer never tries to prove his client's innocence. Even if he is innocent, the fail rate is much higher, than just finding a formal error in the criminal prosecution, that voids any and every evidence.
3. A jury is stupid and has no idea of the actual laws
4. State's attorney knows that, so he does not care for the law and tries to get the subject punished as hard as possible, no matter if he did that or not.
5. The advocate knows 3, too, so he does not care for the laws either.
4a) In front of the court, the definition of adult is: Somebody who has sex with anyone under the age of 18 -or- somebody who commits a major crime (obviously juvenile law was not made to find a fair punishment for a mind not developed enough to handle a given situation but to ... be ignored once the state's attorney thinks the jury hungers for blood enough to punish the kid, no matter how)
Seriously, I don't understand this system. I should stick to my german court shows.
...
Things I have learned from german court shows:
1. If you are subpoenaed, apear in your working outfit, so that everybody knows what you are. This is especially important, if you are a prostitude or a pimp.
1a. If you look like a Hippie you are probably some kind of psycho sect leader.
2. Everyday is "Bring your own evidence day" at court.
3. The (real) guilty person will confess the whole crime, if he just get's angry enough at the victim, just to tell him "And you deserve it. Ha!"
4. Nowadays you can scream, shout and insult each other at court and you will only get a firm warning. Just racial and major sexist insults will get you a fine.
Okay, maybe I shouldn't watch that either and should start to watch less television.
But not today, Law and Order starts in a quarter of an hour.
1. If a policemen does something illegal at work, nobody ever brings charge aganst him to the court. Instead, the criminal, he is investigating against at this time, get's a general immunity.
2. A successful lawyer never tries to prove his client's innocence. Even if he is innocent, the fail rate is much higher, than just finding a formal error in the criminal prosecution, that voids any and every evidence.
3. A jury is stupid and has no idea of the actual laws
4. State's attorney knows that, so he does not care for the law and tries to get the subject punished as hard as possible, no matter if he did that or not.
5. The advocate knows 3, too, so he does not care for the laws either.
4a) In front of the court, the definition of adult is: Somebody who has sex with anyone under the age of 18 -or- somebody who commits a major crime (obviously juvenile law was not made to find a fair punishment for a mind not developed enough to handle a given situation but to ... be ignored once the state's attorney thinks the jury hungers for blood enough to punish the kid, no matter how)
Seriously, I don't understand this system. I should stick to my german court shows.
...
Things I have learned from german court shows:
1. If you are subpoenaed, apear in your working outfit, so that everybody knows what you are. This is especially important, if you are a prostitude or a pimp.
1a. If you look like a Hippie you are probably some kind of psycho sect leader.
2. Everyday is "Bring your own evidence day" at court.
3. The (real) guilty person will confess the whole crime, if he just get's angry enough at the victim, just to tell him "And you deserve it. Ha!"
4. Nowadays you can scream, shout and insult each other at court and you will only get a firm warning. Just racial and major sexist insults will get you a fine.
Okay, maybe I shouldn't watch that either and should start to watch less television.
But not today, Law and Order starts in a quarter of an hour. Transatlantic politics
by me.
Obama, you're a fucking POPSTAR!
(and I mean that in a good way)
Yes, we love Obama, we do. Germany would totally vote for Obama and not for that other guy*. But we are not Americans, so we can't. We can just cheer for him, because he is our new Popstar. Hooooray!
At least the media says, that Germany loves Obama, and who can you trust, if not the big media. If they say, that I love him, I believe them. Hooray for Obama!
The latest shit was his speach in front of the Berlin Siegessäule. I have not heard it, probably had something else to do (like loitering around or something) but they say it was good. He should make a CD of it, I would totally download it illegally from the internet. Hooray.
Yes, he was not allowed to speak at the Brandenburger Tor. We would have probably loved him even more if he had made the Kennedy and said "Ich bin ein Berliner" (I am a Berliner). But someone thought he has to win this 2nd election first.
Anyway, I just heard a song in the radio - sung by the moderators themselves but anyway, that was the last thing I needed to declare him a popstar.
Sooo, why should you vote him and not that other guy?
1. Race: Obama is black and it would totally show, that you are no racists, if you vote for him, And we Western Yuropeans are totally not racists, too (as long as Obama is not from eastern europe, is he? ** ), so we would totally like you, with a black president.
2. Jack Bauer has a black president, too: Yeah, Obama is much more like the cool Mr. President in 24 and some movies. He is also much younger then that other guy, so, although the color does not fit, I could imagine him much more to climp into a F-16 and shoot down some aliens. Hooray.
3. Planet-wide savety: We were a bit worried about your Bush-Guy. He is not Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and he is not Kim Jong-il but after them... You know, you amerians, you have a lot of nuclear weapons and once all your soldiers are dead or deserted in your not-so-funny war somewhere in the desert, who knows who you bomb. We would totally feel saver if your next president would be whoever is not the successor of Bush. And this is Obama.
Okay, in Europe, we are quite save from your Nukes. You like our cars and stuff and it would be bad buisness to bomb us. ... But then again, once the World's oil gets traded in â¬uro and your gas-prices increase another 50-100% of what it is now, knowbody knows how desperate a trigger-happy president might be.
4. Obama has allready won, I heard it in the news: Wasn't the election the one where he won against Hillary Clinton? No it wasn't? Strange, here, we vote our leaders in one big election, though I have to admit, that a series one 1on1 battles is a lot more manly. Anyway, Obama has won his first round battle, that other guy got a free ticked to the finals, that makes Obama the favorite for the win by pure statistics!
But then, there is also a counter-position.
5. Billy Boy Clinton was also an okay guy. But under him, your nations finances were like ... black numbers.
And then came Bush and he was definitly the best president to happen to the European economics, ever. Protectoristic trade decissions that you just could not afford. A war that is both: A bad idea to begin with and executed poorly. And suddenly we get anything we can pay in dollars for cheap, because your currency has lost so much of it's value. 4 more years of such a politic and we can even affort big, expencive, american cars.
Well, I don't know who you vote but should Obama loose, he can still win the Charts with a rap video, or something.
*: Me knows that other guys name but me is from the internetz and tries to speak for the average german, who is not.
**: Me thinks borders are big shit and and we should work hard to smash the idea of race and diffrent nationalities in our lifetime. But me is a minority.
Disclaimer: This blog was researched poorly. Important facts might have been ignored for a joke ... and a bad one on top of it.
by me.
Obama, you're a fucking POPSTAR!
(and I mean that in a good way)
Yes, we love Obama, we do. Germany would totally vote for Obama and not for that other guy*. But we are not Americans, so we can't. We can just cheer for him, because he is our new Popstar. Hooooray!
At least the media says, that Germany loves Obama, and who can you trust, if not the big media. If they say, that I love him, I believe them. Hooray for Obama!
The latest shit was his speach in front of the Berlin Siegessäule. I have not heard it, probably had something else to do (like loitering around or something) but they say it was good. He should make a CD of it, I would totally download it illegally from the internet. Hooray.
Yes, he was not allowed to speak at the Brandenburger Tor. We would have probably loved him even more if he had made the Kennedy and said "Ich bin ein Berliner" (I am a Berliner). But someone thought he has to win this 2nd election first.
Anyway, I just heard a song in the radio - sung by the moderators themselves but anyway, that was the last thing I needed to declare him a popstar.
Sooo, why should you vote him and not that other guy?
1. Race: Obama is black and it would totally show, that you are no racists, if you vote for him, And we Western Yuropeans are totally not racists, too (as long as Obama is not from eastern europe, is he? ** ), so we would totally like you, with a black president.
2. Jack Bauer has a black president, too: Yeah, Obama is much more like the cool Mr. President in 24 and some movies. He is also much younger then that other guy, so, although the color does not fit, I could imagine him much more to climp into a F-16 and shoot down some aliens. Hooray.
3. Planet-wide savety: We were a bit worried about your Bush-Guy. He is not Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and he is not Kim Jong-il but after them... You know, you amerians, you have a lot of nuclear weapons and once all your soldiers are dead or deserted in your not-so-funny war somewhere in the desert, who knows who you bomb. We would totally feel saver if your next president would be whoever is not the successor of Bush. And this is Obama.
Okay, in Europe, we are quite save from your Nukes. You like our cars and stuff and it would be bad buisness to bomb us. ... But then again, once the World's oil gets traded in â¬uro and your gas-prices increase another 50-100% of what it is now, knowbody knows how desperate a trigger-happy president might be.
4. Obama has allready won, I heard it in the news: Wasn't the election the one where he won against Hillary Clinton? No it wasn't? Strange, here, we vote our leaders in one big election, though I have to admit, that a series one 1on1 battles is a lot more manly. Anyway, Obama has won his first round battle, that other guy got a free ticked to the finals, that makes Obama the favorite for the win by pure statistics!
But then, there is also a counter-position.
5. Billy Boy Clinton was also an okay guy. But under him, your nations finances were like ... black numbers.
And then came Bush and he was definitly the best president to happen to the European economics, ever. Protectoristic trade decissions that you just could not afford. A war that is both: A bad idea to begin with and executed poorly. And suddenly we get anything we can pay in dollars for cheap, because your currency has lost so much of it's value. 4 more years of such a politic and we can even affort big, expencive, american cars.
Well, I don't know who you vote but should Obama loose, he can still win the Charts with a rap video, or something.
*: Me knows that other guys name but me is from the internetz and tries to speak for the average german, who is not.
**: Me thinks borders are big shit and and we should work hard to smash the idea of race and diffrent nationalities in our lifetime. But me is a minority.
Disclaimer: This blog was researched poorly. Important facts might have been ignored for a joke ... and a bad one on top of it.
Let's have a comercial break.
Let me present to you the game of games. I know it's complatly unrelated but I just need to spread the word:
The name is Dominions 3 and it is an old school turn based strategy game.
Okay, that it's old school if it's turn based is vacous truth.
However, it offers more strategic deeps than any other game ever before ... to my knowledge.
Let's have a banner:
Now this is promotion, isn't it?
But there is more:
More then 2000 diffrent units. From the common militia to the knight, the mage the Lizard King, bolder throwing giants and mind-blasting illithids.
These units are divided into diffrent nations - 68 with the latest patch -, and those again divided into 3 diffrent ages.
There is much to do, the average turn consists of:
-Watching and analysing the battles that happened since the last turn.
-Recruiting new troops in your castles.
-Asigning troops to commanders and sending them from province to province - and attacking the enemy.
-Ordering the mages to research better spells, casing rituals or forging magic items.
-Giving the items to powerful summoned creatures can create powerful Supercombatants, who fight whole armies.
-And a lot more, from pillaging to assasinating, setting taxes, mercenaries, sieges and never forget:
-Spreading the faith in your pretender god:
Military might is not everything in Dominions, with every nation you can choose one out of a list of powerful pretenders, fighting to become the one true god. - Because if nobody believes in a god anymore, he is vanquished.
So many cool features, let's just have another banner:
You allready want to take a look at it yourself?
Here some links:
Here is the demo: http://www.shrapnelgames.com/Illwinter/Dom3/6.htm
Here is the forum, to get an impression of the player base: http://www.shrapnelcommunity.com/threads/postlist.php?Board=dom3
Is there more?
Yes, the game comes with good modding support for even more stuff (you just have to sort out the crap).
The last patch is just a week old and it's not unreasonable to asume it wasn't the last. And what they call patch would be an expansion for many other games.
I really like that campaign. There are not really and hot pictures in the game, because the units are like 16 to 64 pixel high but ... that should be no reason to not have nice banners.
Let's come to the most imporant point: Multiplayer!
Multiplayer has much resemblance with a social life - don't we TBS-players try to avoid exacly that? No longer! Dominions 3 was designed with "Play by Email" in mind. Players sent their turn decissions to the host, who calculates the new turn and sends it back to the players. Yes, one game can take long.
I prefer lokal games and usually play hot seat mode with a friend.
Of course, this does not work great with games at 5-15 players: More then two at one PC might take a bit to long, there you should better play simultanous by LAN.
Anyway, did I mention that the Multiplayer aspect is great? It is.
So, when will you like it:
You will love it, if you like epic fantasy strategy games with an extreamly detailed combat system and unequalt strategic debth.
When will you hate it:
If you prefer a modern graphic and/or a fast action-driven gameplay, you might rather check Starcraft 2, since Dominions would probably get the "Not for me" button then.
I think everything important is said. I'll just have another pretty ad, because women with swords is teh hotness
Let me present to you the game of games. I know it's complatly unrelated but I just need to spread the word:
The name is Dominions 3 and it is an old school turn based strategy game.
Okay, that it's old school if it's turn based is vacous truth.
However, it offers more strategic deeps than any other game ever before ... to my knowledge.
Let's have a banner:
Now this is promotion, isn't it?
But there is more:
More then 2000 diffrent units. From the common militia to the knight, the mage the Lizard King, bolder throwing giants and mind-blasting illithids.
These units are divided into diffrent nations - 68 with the latest patch -, and those again divided into 3 diffrent ages.
There is much to do, the average turn consists of:
-Watching and analysing the battles that happened since the last turn.
-Recruiting new troops in your castles.
-Asigning troops to commanders and sending them from province to province - and attacking the enemy.
-Ordering the mages to research better spells, casing rituals or forging magic items.
-Giving the items to powerful summoned creatures can create powerful Supercombatants, who fight whole armies.
-And a lot more, from pillaging to assasinating, setting taxes, mercenaries, sieges and never forget:
-Spreading the faith in your pretender god:
Military might is not everything in Dominions, with every nation you can choose one out of a list of powerful pretenders, fighting to become the one true god. - Because if nobody believes in a god anymore, he is vanquished.
So many cool features, let's just have another banner:
You allready want to take a look at it yourself?
Here some links:
Here is the demo: http://www.shrapnelgames.com/Illwinter/Dom3/6.htm
Here is the forum, to get an impression of the player base: http://www.shrapnelcommunity.com/threads/postlist.php?Board=dom3
Is there more?
Yes, the game comes with good modding support for even more stuff (you just have to sort out the crap).
The last patch is just a week old and it's not unreasonable to asume it wasn't the last. And what they call patch would be an expansion for many other games.
I really like that campaign.
There are not really and hot pictures in the game, because the units are like 16 to 64 pixel high but ... that should be no reason to not have nice banners. Let's come to the most imporant point: Multiplayer!
Multiplayer has much resemblance with a social life - don't we TBS-players try to avoid exacly that? No longer! Dominions 3 was designed with "Play by Email" in mind. Players sent their turn decissions to the host, who calculates the new turn and sends it back to the players. Yes, one game can take long.
I prefer lokal games and usually play hot seat mode with a friend.
Of course, this does not work great with games at 5-15 players: More then two at one PC might take a bit to long, there you should better play simultanous by LAN.
Anyway, did I mention that the Multiplayer aspect is great? It is.
So, when will you like it:
You will love it, if you like epic fantasy strategy games with an extreamly detailed combat system and unequalt strategic debth.
When will you hate it:
If you prefer a modern graphic and/or a fast action-driven gameplay, you might rather check Starcraft 2, since Dominions would probably get the "Not for me" button then.
I think everything important is said. I'll just have another pretty ad, because women with swords is teh hotness
Beauty - in the Eye of the Beholder?
Bwaha - I'm Beholder, you see my beauty-eye? Hahaha
Today, for the reason given in the end, I decided to have some thoughts about beauty. What is beauty? Is it a complex, n-dimensional mathematical function, is it "purely subjective" - or what?
I don't think so. I usually reject any "middle way" solution. The world is much more black and white as most grey-painters want to believe. ... But not in that case.
To my observation, beauty clearly consists of 3 levels:
-Subjective attraction
-Cultural beauty
-Objective beauty
Subjective: Everybody has personal tastes based primary on 1) parents (as Freudian as it sounds true. I think Freud was just a perv, btw), 2) self-image and 3) past loves (hopefully this is more important than 1).
If subjective attraction totally opposes the other 2 aspects of beauty, you get a very strange person.
Cultural aspects: "RUBENS PAINTED FAT WOMEN AND EVERYBODY LOVED THEM" is often cried as an argument by ugly people, why they are in fact beautyful despite the fact that nobody notices (how delusional). Thesis is, that the culture you live in dictates your definition of beauty. This is to simplistic but it has a true core. I mean, if this was true wouldn't al models look exactly the same? ... But, many models look somewhat similar. Usually Cultural beauty respects objective aspects, though their are exceptions (just google "Padaung tribe women" - that are those with the really long necks)
Objective beauty: We had the "One person by itself" aspect and the "group of people" aspects, now these are the Species-wide parameters defining beauty. They are inherent to all people (though they can't be "trained" away by traumas, brainwashing or similar. Don't try that at home.) and useful to get along among other humans. It's a primitive perception, whether the possible partner is healthy/strong and has good genes.
Now, where is Suicide Girls in this?
Suicide Girls is trying to "redefine beauty" - and doing a good job with it. There are attacking the predominant "cultural beauty". To a good part the importants of this aspect can be seen as moved towards the personal aspects. Up to a point. Human is a herd animal, beauty will allways have group-aspects (the side has "groups" as a feature!). However SG offers the unconventional taste a new and great "culture" to belong to in woman-taste.
And... "I love it".
On an only really slightly related note:
I just decided to do something for my personal good-looking, too. I'm definitly not vain but I though, that by now I have been fat long enough and so I will go on an epic, manly diet. This will show every woman, what man are really capeable of ... damn, why am I writing this here? Am I in delirium allready?
Anyway, I was like "diet tomorrow" for quite a while now and yesturday I said: "Diet now". Today I'm posting here to make sure I don't back out.
Plan: It will consist of a power-attack week on and a continous-care month.
Minimum goal for the first week is an average of 1 pount the day but I'm more aiming for 1 to 1.5 Kilogramm per day. A strikt "Eat 1/10th" philosopy combined with more sport (to lose fat instead of muscles) will probably manage this. The month afterwards will then consist of slowly beginning to eat normal again with further monitoring of the weigth, primary to make sure it does not all boomerang back.
Btw, before anyone thinks 1 Kilogramm each day is impossible: It's possible, as long as you start at about 104 (228 lbs.).
Edit after a week: So, I got to 5 Kilogramm (~11 lbs) in 7 days. I had done better before but it is still satisfactory. Fitness also went up a bit due to the daily "miimum sport" - now into the less drastic step.
Comments for coments below:
Sheena: Ich habe mir noch nicht alle 1742 SGs angesehen, aber genug um sagen zu können, das der Platz in meinen Favorite 4 recht sicher ist. ;-)
Ajilee: Extensible Open XHTML Outlines was naver that sexy.
Bwaha - I'm Beholder, you see my beauty-eye? Hahaha
Today, for the reason given in the end, I decided to have some thoughts about beauty. What is beauty? Is it a complex, n-dimensional mathematical function, is it "purely subjective" - or what?
I don't think so. I usually reject any "middle way" solution. The world is much more black and white as most grey-painters want to believe. ... But not in that case.
To my observation, beauty clearly consists of 3 levels:
-Subjective attraction
-Cultural beauty
-Objective beauty
Subjective: Everybody has personal tastes based primary on 1) parents (as Freudian as it sounds true. I think Freud was just a perv, btw), 2) self-image and 3) past loves (hopefully this is more important than 1).
If subjective attraction totally opposes the other 2 aspects of beauty, you get a very strange person.
Cultural aspects: "RUBENS PAINTED FAT WOMEN AND EVERYBODY LOVED THEM" is often cried as an argument by ugly people, why they are in fact beautyful despite the fact that nobody notices (how delusional). Thesis is, that the culture you live in dictates your definition of beauty. This is to simplistic but it has a true core. I mean, if this was true wouldn't al models look exactly the same? ... But, many models look somewhat similar. Usually Cultural beauty respects objective aspects, though their are exceptions (just google "Padaung tribe women" - that are those with the really long necks)
Objective beauty: We had the "One person by itself" aspect and the "group of people" aspects, now these are the Species-wide parameters defining beauty. They are inherent to all people (though they can't be "trained" away by traumas, brainwashing or similar. Don't try that at home.) and useful to get along among other humans. It's a primitive perception, whether the possible partner is healthy/strong and has good genes.
Now, where is Suicide Girls in this?
Suicide Girls is trying to "redefine beauty" - and doing a good job with it. There are attacking the predominant "cultural beauty". To a good part the importants of this aspect can be seen as moved towards the personal aspects. Up to a point. Human is a herd animal, beauty will allways have group-aspects (the side has "groups" as a feature!). However SG offers the unconventional taste a new and great "culture" to belong to in woman-taste.
And... "I love it".
On an only really slightly related note:
I just decided to do something for my personal good-looking, too. I'm definitly not vain but I though, that by now I have been fat long enough and so I will go on an epic, manly diet. This will show every woman, what man are really capeable of ... damn, why am I writing this here? Am I in delirium allready?
Anyway, I was like "diet tomorrow" for quite a while now and yesturday I said: "Diet now". Today I'm posting here to make sure I don't back out.
Plan: It will consist of a power-attack week on and a continous-care month.
Minimum goal for the first week is an average of 1 pount the day but I'm more aiming for 1 to 1.5 Kilogramm per day. A strikt "Eat 1/10th" philosopy combined with more sport (to lose fat instead of muscles) will probably manage this. The month afterwards will then consist of slowly beginning to eat normal again with further monitoring of the weigth, primary to make sure it does not all boomerang back.
Btw, before anyone thinks 1 Kilogramm each day is impossible: It's possible, as long as you start at about 104 (228 lbs.).
Edit after a week: So, I got to 5 Kilogramm (~11 lbs) in 7 days. I had done better before but it is still satisfactory. Fitness also went up a bit due to the daily "miimum sport" - now into the less drastic step.
Comments for coments below:
Sheena: Ich habe mir noch nicht alle 1742 SGs angesehen, aber genug um sagen zu können, das der Platz in meinen Favorite 4 recht sicher ist. ;-)
Ajilee: Extensible Open XHTML Outlines was naver that sexy.
JANUARY 2010
DECEMBER 2009
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
NOVEMBER 2009
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
OCTOBER 2009
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31