TO LOGO OR NOT TO LOGO
So recently I have heard a few different hopefuls getting crap cause they do not use the SG watermark.
However {I have tried to locate it & can not} I do not see why hopefuls would need a watermark. Does it boost your votes ? Your page still says hopeful, so is it what the logo/watermark stands for that makes it something to want to rock ?
From the photographer stand point a watermark defines who owns the rights to an image[s]. If you have not been paid for your images then its like giving away your images.
From the five hopefuls I know/work with or speak to regularly whom do not use the logo/watermark they feel its a thing to earn and then celebrate. Like the day it appears on their images will be THE DAY !!! Like a letter-mans jacket letters...
I guess I would love to know what others think or stand on the using logos on hopeful sets.
So recently I have heard a few different hopefuls getting crap cause they do not use the SG watermark.
However {I have tried to locate it & can not} I do not see why hopefuls would need a watermark. Does it boost your votes ? Your page still says hopeful, so is it what the logo/watermark stands for that makes it something to want to rock ?
From the photographer stand point a watermark defines who owns the rights to an image[s]. If you have not been paid for your images then its like giving away your images.
From the five hopefuls I know/work with or speak to regularly whom do not use the logo/watermark they feel its a thing to earn and then celebrate. Like the day it appears on their images will be THE DAY !!! Like a letter-mans jacket letters...
I guess I would love to know what others think or stand on the using logos on hopeful sets.



