And today's argument is with this Jerkt. I don't think I've ever had the displeasure of arguing with someone on this site until just now. Honestly, I don't really give a shit if I rub people the wrong way or not. It's part of being who I am and if you don't like it... well... "You can eat a dick."

So, let's see what all this fuss is about, shall we?



And the ensuing conversation:


LillithVain said:
x2 And whoever the person fucking her is- that sick fucking pedophile should be shot as well.

The thought of sticking your *whatever* in a baby's vagina is beyond horrendous. This is worse than tasteless. It disgusts me so much that I'm actually having a problem finding words right now....


-Swizzle_ Said:
How can you accuse somebody of being a pedophile because they happen to be sleeping with someone who has an idiotic tattoo? confusedWhat makes you think that the guy would actually be thinking that he is having sex with a baby?
Whilst i would say that someone who was willing to have sex with the person who has that on their body is obviously desperate to get laid, the person with the real problem is the one with the tattoo.

LillithVain Said:

THE BABY'S CROTCH AND HER CROTCH ARE THE SAME CROTCH.

_Swizzle_ Said:

NO THEY ARE FUCKING NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THERE IS NO FUCKING BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IT IS AN IMAGE tattooed onto someone who has utilised a particular body part to represent a particular body part that happens to look like the same thing as any females body, regardless of age. That does not mean that the person penatrating that area is thinking that they are having sexual relations with an infant child.
I've heard some fucking stupid shit that people say, but this has to be up there with the best of them.


AND NOW FOR SOME MORE FUCKING AHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
First of all- utilized and penetrating are both spell wrong. If you are going to try and insult someone you should at least take the time to SPELL your words correctly. Now, onto what you have to 'say'. The girl's Vagina is being UTILIZED to pictorially describe the 'baby's' Vagina. The picture of the baby is red faced and crying as if something terrible is being done to it. In order to have sex with this girl you would have to stick your 'member' into her vagina which is also being used as a part of the photo, namely it's Vagina.

So... going about your logic- If you printed out a picture of a nude baby and you put a hole in where it's 'Vagina' was supped to be and had sex with it- that wouldn't be considered a pedophilia tendency? How about simply watching a photo or video of a child and thinking about doing it- which is just a picture representation of a child- is that also not a pedophilia tendency? What if it was a cartoon of a child and you were watching and being aroused at the same time? What about if you were LOOKING DOWN AT YOURSELF FUCKING SOMEONE AND WHAT YOU SAW WAS THE FACE OF A CRYING BABY EVERY TIME YOU STUCK YOURSELF INTO HER? No?

pedophilia
[ped′əfil′ē·ə]
Etymology: Gk, pais, child, philein, to love
1 an abnormal interest in children.
2 (in psychiatry) a psychosexual disorder in which the fantasy or act of engaging in sexual activity with prepubertal children is the preferred or exclusive means of achieving sexual excitement and gratification. It may be heterosexual or homosexual.

Perhaps your argument is then not what you've actually stated and is really that you can be attracted to the woman with the tattoo and want to have sex with her without wanting to have sex with children. Which I can completely understand. The thought of having sex with children might disturb you- so then when you see the tattoo and realize what it will look like when you are having sex with her: you should be disturbed. Correct, this would not make you a pedophile. If having sex with her and enjoying the fact that the tattoo is placed there then you WOULD be a pedophile. I would like to think that anyone with a sense of common decency would be disgusted at the idea that the photo is using her Vagina as a representation of a child's vagina and would seriously think twice before having sex with someone with said tattoo.

Regardless of whether you do it in the dark, flip her over, or cover the tattoo- in the back of your mind you will still know that it's there and I don't see how anyone could get that image out of their head enough to enjoy themselves- But Hey, maybe that's just me.

But, I would thank you to keep your limited imagination insults to yourself. If you can't have an argument or conversation with stooping to name calling then you have bigger problems to worry about then whether I am right or you are right. It's all in the way you look at it.

Also, I'm pretty sure that since I've posted this in the Tattoo group I'll be getting kicked out of the group soon. If any of you are in there and you can't find me anymore you know what happened and where you can find me.