ugh... i'm an 11. winterizing the house will happen this summer. the flying thing isn't fair though if the army makes you go somewhere, maybe i shouldn't count that
Looks like the two major determining factors are dwelling and location. For instance, 5+ person apartment dwelling in WA was estimated at 4.3 tons in the calculator, but the same dwelling ranged all over the place ...
WA 4.3, NY 8.3, HI 12.0, NC 9.4, SC 6.7, AK 12, ME 8.2, NJ 6.8, ID 2.6, FL 11
VA 9.8, ND 18, SD 7.9, VT 2.6 , WY 17, CO 16, MT 12, PA 8.5
It appears locations rich in hydro power have substantially lower CO2 generation ... makes sense ... and hotter places (more A/C) can be about the same impact as colder places (more heating), but can't figure why New Jersey at 6.8 tons is an outlier compared to PA at 8.5 and NY at 8.3.
Even with my adjustments (for efficient appliances, lighting, etc.) going negative this calculator rates me at 32 ton/year. Seemed high, so worked it out from the other direction - house and location seem to bundle electricity and home heating/cooling together, so broke them out - and found I'm producing about 20 tons CO2/year.
Guess the only thing to do is marry and raise two kids ... that would bring it down into the 7 ton/year range.
Though my dwelling and location both were incorrect, as there was no option for Canadians who live in tiny studio sized apartments. I went with what Agy did, and just entered NY. A few questions should give a better range of answers.
5.3 using this calculator (but I had to pretend I lived in Maine!)
the UK Government Carbon calculator - rather optimistically - claims my actual footprint is 3.3 tonnes. You can probably double that, so i don't feel too smug.
how about instead of worrying about meaningless shit like a carbon footprint we worry about the island of trash in the middle of the pacific ocean that's the size of texas?