SG is like goths, punks, over-stoned hippies and modernists. It's a representation of alt-ideals that wish to be artistic and progressive. But they are not concrete ideas, thus they turned into these expired, ridiculous fads as time expired these ideals, and it's rather silly that since 1920's, people continue to ask the age-old & already-answered-in-all-possible-ways question:
What is art?
But what IS art?
(oh, it's so DEEP...so PHILOSOPHICAL...)
*yawn*
Calling it post-mo is redundant, and the redundancy of post-mo is a redundant statement.
2-3 demonstrations of "creativity" (yeah) a day since...2000? 2001? And women's idea of womanhood had only became more banal than ever. Trying to find era-old ideals of feminine "grace" and "beauty" underneath at best Kitch cosmetics and costumes, through the staple-images of tittie-grabbing, crutching ass-spreading, pussy-flashing, "come hither" expressions, playing with glass, coals, and watery ice, molesting your internet-friends' banjos, are over and done ideas. I am not saying these women didn't try against or assisted in the war for branches of feminism; but it's not hard to see that SG, right now, is nothing beyond extentions of clothing tags on sex shop items. Whether art or porn, our sets are rallied through a line of acceptance process suggesting that unless we meet the needs of our eye-candy demanding viewer, we are "out".
This is not news, of course.
SG is expecting women of all kinds to involve themselves in civilized cat-fights, a competition to see who can look flirtatious and sexy enough to be the next alt-mainstream trend. The moderators all have their definitions of beauty set in stone. How are many of us more than internet porn stars? Other internet porn stars get paid in advance to their pictures being used! We are given a budget of $0 everytime we start a set, we show up on time with our own resources of amateur...
What is art?
But what IS art?
(oh, it's so DEEP...so PHILOSOPHICAL...)
*yawn*
Calling it post-mo is redundant, and the redundancy of post-mo is a redundant statement.
2-3 demonstrations of "creativity" (yeah) a day since...2000? 2001? And women's idea of womanhood had only became more banal than ever. Trying to find era-old ideals of feminine "grace" and "beauty" underneath at best Kitch cosmetics and costumes, through the staple-images of tittie-grabbing, crutching ass-spreading, pussy-flashing, "come hither" expressions, playing with glass, coals, and watery ice, molesting your internet-friends' banjos, are over and done ideas. I am not saying these women didn't try against or assisted in the war for branches of feminism; but it's not hard to see that SG, right now, is nothing beyond extentions of clothing tags on sex shop items. Whether art or porn, our sets are rallied through a line of acceptance process suggesting that unless we meet the needs of our eye-candy demanding viewer, we are "out".
This is not news, of course.
SG is expecting women of all kinds to involve themselves in civilized cat-fights, a competition to see who can look flirtatious and sexy enough to be the next alt-mainstream trend. The moderators all have their definitions of beauty set in stone. How are many of us more than internet porn stars? Other internet porn stars get paid in advance to their pictures being used! We are given a budget of $0 everytime we start a set, we show up on time with our own resources of amateur...


































