I'd really love to get some constructive criticism. Mostly on my posing and expressions and things, I know my photo quality could have been better.
For some reason there were some photos from the end of the set not included. Does anyone know if there's a way I can tack them on, or am I stuck with what's here?
Okay, so this set isn't the highest quality, but it does remind me of the old-style sets of SG, in that really lustful girl-at-home way. It is super gorgeous. The lighting is consistent, even if the colour is a little bit off so that makes it super easy to fix. You have an absolutely FLAWLESS figure and are just really too cute.
The only issue I see is that there are too many phtoos with your clothes on. If you'd had more than 1/2 the photos that are nude then there might be more likely enough photos for SG to make a set from. Remember that you have to be getting naked in the first 1/3 of the photos. Still, I think if this set was editied down and photoshopped right (I'd love to get my grubby hands on it) I think it could be a really quietly sexy set. I love it!
I think your expressions and poses are just dreamy <3
BlueRabbit said:
I'd really love to get some constructive criticism. Mostly on my posing and expressions and things, I know my photo quality could have been better.
You asked for constructive, I hope this is so. . .
Overall I liked the set. I think you may have tried to "tell a story" frame by frame and got lost. Frames 1 to 13 could have been done in 4 shots. There is really nothing wrong with your posing. Its just a matter of practising and knowing your angles. Knowing what you are 'presenting' and how to accentuate it. Being playful would help. Your a little stiff and bored in some shots where you were suppose to be having fun.
I'd like to have seen more of your legs.
IPOD
RADIO
loading your activity feed...
BlueRabbit
HOPEFUL
USA
NOV 30, 1999 12:00 AM