TOPICS:
JAN 27, 2010 01:26 PM
JAN 27, 2010 01:32 PM
JAN 27, 2010 01:56 PM
Very nice
JAN 27, 2010 05:10 PM
JAN 27, 2010 05:18 PM
JAN 27, 2010 05:18 PM
JAN 27, 2010 05:24 PM
JAN 27, 2010 05:28 PM
JAN 27, 2010 05:37 PM
JAN 27, 2010 05:40 PM
JAN 27, 2010 05:57 PM
Johnny_Incognito said:
Coyotemike said:
Darke said:
"Hey look, we took something already invented and slapped a better screen on it. Again! Wow!"
And yet, managed to make it worse.
No camera.
No Flash video support.
No changeable battery.
No TV subscription
No flash video.
...
No flash video.
...
No, just let that sink in a little.
I should mention that I don't really know what that means. I just read a review 
JAN 27, 2010 06:03 PM
Coyotemike said:
Johnny_Incognito said:
Coyotemike said:
Darke said:
"Hey look, we took something already invented and slapped a better screen on it. Again! Wow!"
And yet, managed to make it worse.
No camera.
No Flash video support.
No changeable battery.
No TV subscription
No flash video.
...
No flash video.
...
No, just let that sink in a little.
I should mention that I don't really know what that means. I just read a review
Any site that has a pretty animation, any site that has video, any site etc etc. So like, 99% of the interwebs. 
JAN 27, 2010 06:33 PM
JAN 27, 2010 07:10 PM
JAN 27, 2010 09:24 PM
Johnny_Incognito said:
Coyotemike said:
Johnny_Incognito said:
Coyotemike said:
Darke said:
"Hey look, we took something already invented and slapped a better screen on it. Again! Wow!"
And yet, managed to make it worse.
No camera.
No Flash video support.
No changeable battery.
No TV subscription
No flash video.
...
No flash video.
...
No, just let that sink in a little.
I should mention that I don't really know what that means. I just read a review
Any site that has a pretty animation, any site that has video, any site etc etc. So like, 99% of the interwebs.
I'm not usually one to defend an Apple product, but If that new version of HTML(can't recall the name at the second, HTML5 or something?) that doesn't require Flash to play videos becomes common place (which the Safari browser already has support for), will that be such an issue? I mean there are plenty of other things I dislike about the iPad that I'd rather just get a netbook for if I really wanted something like it, but no Flash video support seems like it might be a non-issue eventually. Yeah, I know, eventually.
JAN 27, 2010 09:38 PM
Kolic said:
Johnny_Incognito said:
Coyotemike said:
Johnny_Incognito said:
Coyotemike said:
Darke said:
"Hey look, we took something already invented and slapped a better screen on it. Again! Wow!"
And yet, managed to make it worse.
No camera.
No Flash video support.
No changeable battery.
No TV subscription
No flash video.
...
No flash video.
...
No, just let that sink in a little.
I should mention that I don't really know what that means. I just read a review
Any site that has a pretty animation, any site that has video, any site etc etc. So like, 99% of the interwebs.
I'm not usually one to defend an Apple product, but If that new version of HTML(can't recall the name at the second, HTML5 or something?) that doesn't require Flash to play videos becomes common place (which the Safari browser already has support for), will that be such an issue? I mean there are plenty of other things I dislike about the iPad that I'd rather just get a netbook for if I really wanted something like it, but no Flash video support seems like it might be a non-issue eventually. Yeah, I know, eventually.
The article I read mentioned that the version of Safari on it doesn't support Flash.
JAN 27, 2010 09:53 PM
Coyotemike said:
Kolic said:
Johnny_Incognito said:
Coyotemike said:
Johnny_Incognito said:
Coyotemike said:
Darke said:
"Hey look, we took something already invented and slapped a better screen on it. Again! Wow!"
And yet, managed to make it worse.
No camera.
No Flash video support.
No changeable battery.
No TV subscription
No flash video.
...
No flash video.
...
No, just let that sink in a little.
I should mention that I don't really know what that means. I just read a review
Any site that has a pretty animation, any site that has video, any site etc etc. So like, 99% of the interwebs.
I'm not usually one to defend an Apple product, but If that new version of HTML(can't recall the name at the second, HTML5 or something?) that doesn't require Flash to play videos becomes common place (which the Safari browser already has support for), will that be such an issue? I mean there are plenty of other things I dislike about the iPad that I'd rather just get a netbook for if I really wanted something like it, but no Flash video support seems like it might be a non-issue eventually. Yeah, I know, eventually.
The article I read mentioned that the version of Safari on it doesn't support Flash.
Yeah, I meant that Safari has built in support for the new version of HTML code that allows for embedded video without the need for Flash. You're right, I wasn't very clear.
JAN 27, 2010 10:26 PM
i want one
JAN 27, 2010 11:33 PM
Where's that music coming from? 
JAN 28, 2010 12:53 AM
JAN 28, 2010 04:29 AM
JAN 28, 2010 08:59 AM
JAN 28, 2010 09:35 AM
El_Bandito said:
Im not seeing why everyone is getting their panties in a bunch here. Its just another tech toy. If you want it. Buy it. If you dont....get on with your lives...lol
Unjustified rage powers the internet. So every time you use logic, a lolcat dies.
Think about that
ShadowDrgn
Boca Raton, FL
August 2006
JAN 27, 2010 01:20 PM