Resurrecting Lame Old Threads Sucks

Seriously. Knock it off, or it's ring-a-ding-ding for you bozos.

You know who you are. And more importantly, I know who you are. Now drop this bunkum tout-suite, capisce?

Yes.

Yes let's bump lame new ones instead.

He hasn't heard. We maybe better show him what we do to palookas who seem hard of hearing.

New ones don't need a bump, Mr. Mensa.

I agree.

It'd be an improvement. "I threw up today"? "Something bad happened to a clown"?

That depends on your definition of new, dingleberry.

I think a thread six minutes old is still "new". Of course, I could be wrong.

Isn't ring-a-ding-ding Sinatra's euphamism for getting laid? So if I resurrect old threads I'm going to get some? I've got some work to do.

Wait, are you saying if I resurrect threads I'm going to get some from Zarth?


I've got some serious thinking to do.

It seems Mr. Voorhees wants to play. Very well.

Why do they do this? I mean, aren't we here to see the bewbs?

Should threads have freshness dates? Like a Pabst or a loaf of wonder bread?

How old a thread is irrelevant IF, and only if, you can take the thread, add something new to it, and make it interesting again. I'm just not seeing that with the dredging that's happened in the past little bit.

I concur wholeheartedly.

Pabst has a freshness date?

Actually I'm not sure. It seems somewhat moot if true.

See? Now this is amusing.

Can we all agree yet?

About Pabst?

I don't care. They're more interesting than anything else on the boards these days...

You feel inadequate, Zarth?

Hell, about anything.

You wanna dance?

Pabst seems like as good a place to start as any.

Which one of you is gonna be Patrick Swayze, and which is gonna be Jennifer Grey?

I call Swayze.