Infinite Regress of the Female Orgasm

Here's a thought. I believe this idea lies within the subconscious of most men. I believe it may even prevent us from acheiving a level of sexual performance that is only rumored to exist in Europeans (and then only really in French and Italian men...sorry Portuagal). Enough blabber and on to the theory.

Multiple Orgasms. This is a foreign concept to men. There are those who have achieved giving their partners 2, 3, maybe 4 orgasms. (Anything past that I will dismiss as pornography-fiction unless I have concrete evidence supported by witnesses.) However men themselves can only achieve that single solitary climax. Maybe more if there's a snack break in between (interpret that as you will).

On the other hand, women can achieve mulitple orgasms in a row with no real break necessary. This idea of course means that theoretically a woman's sexual appetite is never quenched. They can have an infinite number of orgasms.

The weight of that concept is too much for us to bear. How can a man possibly compare to stamina of that magnitude? How can we be expected to perform in such a manner to achieve a theortically impossible goal? I hear of female porn stars and nymphomaniacs who have sex with scores of men in a single outing. These are people whose lives are built around the act of intercourse and they are nary satisfied with one or even multiple partners. They have reached the status of requiring near armies -- sexual drones -- to quell their unquenchable thirst!

Our pride, nay, our manhood has been trumped. How are we to cope with such inferiority?

The only way we know how: reassuring ourselves that we may indeed have some superiority in this matter by littering the earth's horizons with phallic structures and reinforcing the validity of our monuments by putting them on postcards.

But on the other hand, when I arrange my nuts just right and look down, my genitals can do a good Gonzo impression.

I don't need multiple orgasms when I can have a muppet show in my pants, on demand.

Joke:
How do you give a woman multiple orgasms?

I wouldnt exactly say its an inferiority, Personally i'd rather give a woman heaps of orgasms rather than just the piddly one, but hey thats just me .

speak for yourself bub

I can lift a barbell several times in a row with no real break necessary. Can I theoretically lift it an infinite number of times?

Yes, how can a man, who has not only his penis, but also a tongue, ten fingers, and maybe some toys, hope to ever satisfy a woman? After all, their desire is infinite, right?

News flash, guys want big dicks (and phallic symbols by extension) so they'll feel superior to other men, not to satisfy women.

Also, I'm annoyed that this topic wasn't a hotter version of the Hasslehof Recursion.



[Edited on Aug 11, 2005 by grahf]

Yeah, uh... A couple of times, I've just kinda...kept going. A few minutes later... It was kinda dry the second time, but it was pretty unmistakably an orgasm.

mostly because i like coming. cumming. alan cumming.

This is the best post I've seen in quite some time.

Which raises the question in my mind... "What about the Chickens?"

You can't be serious really. More than 4 is pornography fiction?

I dunno. I kinda like the idea that "giving" more than 4 makes me the star of pornography fiction.

Call me Brock. Brock Chestocles.

I know this is mostly a guy argument, but I just had to pop in briefly to say...

Awww. Oh, sweetie... you have no idea.

I've had a multiple orgasm. Just one. But it was either a multiple orgasm or just the Orgasm From Dimension O! It involved one squirt, two or three orgasms, a startled expression, and a good helping of confusion.

That said, anything more than four means you're starting to get to know your partner and figure out what works for their body. Starting, mind you.

You ever notice that if someone starts a post in Sex Talk with more than a few sentences, it's usually crap? Actually, most of the posts in this section are crap. Including mine! Right. Carry on.

I think it is to be expected. Everything worth saying about sex has been said a thousand times over.

I do know this. Men should never make blanket statements about what women like, what women want, what pleases women, or what it's like to be a woman. Ever. Didn't anyone read Savage Love a few weeks ago, where Dan solicited female readers for oral sex advice, and then published completely contradictory letters in each category (use your finger! DON'T use your finger! Concentrate on the clit! DON'T concentrate on the clit!, etc) just to prove that there is absolutely no universal standard?

Oh, and vice versa.



[Edited on Aug 12, 2005 by Keith]

I think people read way too much into the freudian buildings-are-cocks thing.

Yes, you're right. Normally I'd just post:

and be done with it, but I'm trying to be nice to the newbies.

Hang on, you're saying that because men don't have multiple orgasms they build lots?

This fails because a:some men are capable of multiple orgasm and b:I'm unaware of any research showing anorgasmic women are better builders/architects/whatever.

I've learned how to seperate orgasm and ejaculation which means I can in theory have as many orgasms as I want. I've never really had the chance to go past 4. My current sexual partner has neither the stamina nor interest in helping me achieve a greater quantity of orgasms within one love making session.

Although the SG's pics are a great aid to routine manual sexual gratification they have as of yet proved unreliable in helping me to achieve secondary orgasm. The future of interactive pornography could prove adequate.

No no, you're holding your orgasm identification chart upside down.

I'm not sure it's that men can't have multiple orgasms, it's more that it probably requires some serious practice. As orgasm and ejaculation usually go hand in hand for men, and because the penis is so incredibly sensitive after ejaculation (or is it orgasm?), you'd need a very skilled and sensitive partner to continue pleasuring you through more orgasms. Or you'd need to perfect a masturbation technique that I, for one, don't care to bother learning.