Sex Talk

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13

 ... 197

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 12

Next

FrozenFoodGod

FrozenFoodGod

Canada
OLD SKOOL

JAN 14, 2003 10:51 PM

This one is for the chicks.....Is there any general preference for either cut or un-cut men? I have met some chicks that prefer cut, and some that don't really have a preference but there don't seem to be any that PREFERE the natural, un-butchered look smile Being from Canada, where circumcision is less common that the USA, I am in my natural state. I would never whack a part of my body off even if women, in general, said they prefer it.....I am just curious as to what women think of this issue. I know that, for men, circumcision means about a 30% loss in sexual sensation and less longevity.... So I, for one, am pretty damn glad to have my turtleneck smile

LuLu

LuLu

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

JAN 14, 2003 11:20 PM

i have never met a guy that wasn't cut. except for a polish dude i knew. but i personal wouldn't go near one that wasn't cut. a little harsh sounding, but they look so scary. i don't wish to offend anyone, its just my opinion. kiss

Obsidian

Obsidian

Frederick, MD
December 2002

JAN 14, 2003 11:28 PM

uncut just reminds me of a sleeping bag...or one of those water tubs that they have at the store that slide through your hand when you pick them up...

giga_geo

giga_geo

San Francisco, CA
November 2002

JAN 15, 2003 12:52 AM

i am scared of uncut... it is foreign to me.. and one thing my mother taught me... be afraid of things that are foreign to you.

not really... but i am scard of it.. i dunno what to do with it...

Mei

Mei

SUICIDEGIRL

Vatican City

JAN 15, 2003 01:20 AM

i prefer uncut for a number of reasons which shall remain my own personal business... but you said you hadn't heard from someone who does, so here i am!

aoife

aoife

Hilton Head Island, SC
October 2002

JAN 15, 2003 01:33 AM

The first guy I ever went down on was uncut. He used to joke that it offended my jewish nature. Really, I think a gay friend of mine said it best...looks like a snake in a turtleneck sweater. wink
I really don't care either way, so long as you go the extra mile to keep it clean. My jewish grandmother would probably disown me for saying so, but then again, she would disown me for giving a blowjob, too.

Twwly

Twwly

SUICIDEGIRL

Ontario, Canada

JAN 15, 2003 01:36 AM

since bathing is a prerequisite either way, i really dont care.

the uncirc'd guys ive been with have had hightened sensitivity issues...
but that's their problem!
whatever

blueyedboy

blueyedboy

Somerville, MA
December 2002

JAN 15, 2003 07:37 AM

.My partner and I are involved in discussions of whether to cut any sons we have or not. Her concerns are ethical (= no cut because an infant can't give consent).

My concerns are cultural (I'm jewish by birth), selfish (I wan't my son to be like me), and hedonistic (I think he'll get more head if he's cut tongue . That all makes me pro-cut. On the con-cut side, if my son is as polymorphously perverse as I am, he'd enjoy having some extra skin to play with, pierce, torture, and other stimulate.

I'm very interested in hearing more opinions from boys as well as girls.

grahf

grahf

New York, NY
September 2002

JAN 15, 2003 08:34 AM

FrozenFoodGod said:
I know that, for men, circumcision means about a 30% loss in sexual sensation and less longevity.... So I, for one, am pretty damn glad to have my turtleneck smile



Really? I always assumed that a loss of sensation would lead to more longevity. I'm personally uncut because my parents were nonconformists, and I've always assumed that I'd cum quicker but have a better time doing it. I'm not too disappointed because more sensation is always good and if I need extra staying power I can always do the Sting thing and have some tantric training or whatever. I mean just imagine having sex for so long that you have to stop because of dehydration, not orgasm. eeek

Edea

Edea

SUICIDEGIRL

New Hampshire, USA

JAN 15, 2003 09:22 AM

Call me a freak, but I really like it UN-cut. Don't ask me why, maybe I'm just biased confused

Twwly

Twwly

SUICIDEGIRL

Ontario, Canada

JAN 15, 2003 11:22 AM

i personally don't think it's right for parents to make the decision. talk about an issue of consent. the procedure is accessible to any male, at any time in his life. why not let him choose, instead of forcing your opinions onto the child in the act of cutting off part of his gentials. thats a pretty strong thing to do.

(this isnt an attack on the fellow above who said he would have his son done, just a general statement of belief).

TarNish

TarNish

Monrovia, CA
January 2003

JAN 15, 2003 01:37 PM

Twwly said:
i personally don't think it's right for parents to make the decision. talk about an issue of consent. the procedure is accessible to any male, at any time in his life. why not let him choose, instead of forcing your opinions onto the child in the act of cutting off part of his gentials. thats a pretty strong thing to do.

(this isnt an attack on the fellow above who said he would have his son done, just a general statement of belief).


I think the main reason that parents have their children circumsized soon after birth is because it is very very painful, and if you do it when they are young they won't remember the pain and it will be less traumatizing for them. my bf is un-cut, he is the first un-cut guy I have ever been with, and I love it. It's natural, although at first I was nervous about it, it does look weird, but in most european countries they probably think that cut one's look funny...or so I was told by an italian friend.

TarNish

TarNish

Monrovia, CA
January 2003

JAN 15, 2003 01:46 PM

Oh and my bf had a friend who got cut when he was 12-13 and he was in so much pain he could'ntt wear anything the least bit binding and missed school for over a week. And I also hear that there is such a thing as foreskin-regeneration, because many men want to have the extra sensitivity that comes with an un-cut penis. I don't know much about that process, but it sounds pretty interesting. Or I could just be talking out of my ass...

noisemx

noisemx

West Bend, WI
January 2003

JAN 15, 2003 03:09 PM

I am cut and feeling has never been an issue, I don't feel I am missing out on anythig. I personally find the appearance of uncut unattractive, but more so the idea of boys who are uncut and are unclean...SMEGMA! As for the issue of children, either way is plausable as it can be done when they are older and it can also be restored too. Actually, I hate penises in general, hence paying somebody five times now to pierce me (which come down to paying someone five times to stab me in the penis). smile
cheers

Twwly

Twwly

SUICIDEGIRL

Ontario, Canada

JAN 15, 2003 06:54 PM

derekandnikki: i know that parents think they are saving their children the "trauma", but in my opinion, the potential trauma for feeling violated later on in life outweighs that. i also tend to disagree that babies "don't feel pain" or that they "don't remember pain". i've seen scientific evidence for both sides....

i mean, you pinch a baby, it cries. you circumsize a baby... it cries harder. and spritually, even if they don't consciously remember the event later on in life...i think everything that happens to us stays with us, no matter what the age.

i have a few 20something male friends who have been recently circumsized, and they all reported it do be a fairly quick surgery, done under a local that healed fairly quickly.

i have 2 male friends that tried to have their circumsisions (done at birth) reversed, and while it IS plausible, it was a far more traumatic and drawn out orderal. one of them had to have multiple surgeries to stretch out enough skin to cover.

i remember when i worked on a crisis line, what we actually had a support group # for men who felt violated about having been circumsized as children...

[Edited on Jan 15, 2003 by Twwly]

xehp

xehp

Rochester, NY
December 2002

JAN 15, 2003 07:25 PM

I'm uncut and loving it. I'm not quite sure why my parents didn't do it, but I sure am glad.
I was the first person my ex-gf ever gave head to, so hopefully she'll give wierd looks to the first cut guy she's with. While we were together, she enjoyed it well enough.
I got a couple foreskin piercings a couple weeks ago by a woman. I think it was the first uncut penis she'd ever seen because she was kinda confused when she went to pull the skin back (initially went for a PA). She didn't have a bad reaction to the foreskin, I think it was just kind of foreign to her.

cozybear

cozybear

Canada
November 2002

JAN 15, 2003 07:28 PM

Un-cut seems a llittle scary until you've actually played with them. They're a lot more fun. I'd have to say that I prefer them. I also have a friend who doesn't like to sleep with guys who have been circumsized. shocked

I'm an absolute freak about cleanliness and I can't say that I've ever had a bad experience with an un-cut guy. I think they're generally pretty thorough with their cleaning.

Of course I'm Canadian too. biggrin

AlexTNOA

AlexTNOA

Island Lake, IL
January 2003

JAN 15, 2003 07:30 PM

i am uncut and ive got to say its nothing to be afraid of...although ive never come from a blowjob...(perhaps i just havent met the right girl)...other than that...when its hard its really not all that different...except the skin doesnt go ALL the way back behind the ridge...i do last a good long while...and thats never a bad thing...

ive never had a girl refuse becuase i am uncut...so dont worry about it...

Synnove

Synnove

SUICIDEGIRL

New Brunswick, Canada

JAN 15, 2003 07:32 PM

i'm with lulu... uncut scares me, they look like dead elephant trunks or ratty socks or something.

noisemx

noisemx

West Bend, WI
January 2003

JAN 15, 2003 07:45 PM

Twwly said:


i have 2 male friends that tried to have their circumsisions (done at birth) reversed, and while it IS plausible, it was a far more traumatic and drawn out orderal. one of them had to have multiple surgeries to stretch out enough skin to cover.
]



I have seen many surgeries that have had very poor results and then men end up looking mutated afterwards. I guess if it matters that much for somebody though

noisemx

noisemx

West Bend, WI
January 2003

JAN 15, 2003 07:46 PM

Twwly said:


i have 2 male friends that tried to have their circumsisions (done at birth) reversed, and while it IS plausible, it was a far more traumatic and drawn out orderal. one of them had to have multiple surgeries to stretch out enough skin to cover.
]



I have seen many surgeries that have had very poor results and then men end up looking mutated afterwards. I guess if it matters that much for somebody though

TarNish

TarNish

Monrovia, CA
January 2003

JAN 15, 2003 10:48 PM

Twwly said:
derekandnikki: i know that parents think they are saving their children the "trauma", but in my opinion, the potential trauma for feeling violated later on in life outweighs that. i also tend to disagree that babies "don't feel pain" or that they "don't remember pain". i've seen scientific evidence for both sides....

i mean, you pinch a baby, it cries. you circumsize a baby... it cries harder. and spritually, even if they don't consciously remember the event later on in life...i think everything that happens to us stays with us, no matter what the age.

i have a few 20something male friends who have been recently circumsized, and they all reported it do be a fairly quick surgery, done under a local that healed fairly quickly.

i have 2 male friends that tried to have their circumsisions (done at birth) reversed, and while it IS plausible, it was a far more traumatic and drawn out orderal. one of them had to have multiple surgeries to stretch out enough skin to cover.

i remember when i worked on a crisis line, what we actually had a support group # for men who felt violated about having been circumsized as children...

[Edited on Jan 15, 2003 by Twwly]



Wow, I have never met a man that said he actually felt "violated" for being cicumsized at birth. I guess I never really thought of it as a violation. But I can see how some could feel that way. I know that if I should ever have a son he will remain uncircumsized, unless he chooses to get cut later in life. Don't get me wrong, I wasn't trying to stick up for people circumsizing their children. I don't really see the need for it to be honest. I was just giving examples of why my parents as well as many other parents I know, have circumsized their boys. smile

miffy

miffy

Japan
December 2002

JAN 15, 2003 11:06 PM

uncut! I'm always very happy to see it's uncut... it's just more natural and it is a lot more sensetive. Keep it clean, boys!

Gwen1

Gwen1

Barbados
September 2002

JAN 16, 2003 07:04 PM

It doesn't matter weather its cut or un cut as long its kept clean. Though I think it seems harder to clean an uncut penis.

grahf

grahf

New York, NY
September 2002

JAN 16, 2003 07:13 PM

I had no idea that there were guys out there who'd been traumatized by being circumcized. I'm content with my hooded monk but I can't imagine being too worked up if I'd been cut when I was a baby. Even if I could remember the pain I don't think I'd be carrying it with me to this day. I actually can somewhat remember a painful occurence from infancy where I got some highly caustic household chemical or another in my eyes. It must have hurt like hell because it necessitated an emergency-room trip and the doctors thought I might have vision damage at first, plus I was apparently crying at the top of my lungs the entire time, but I don't even remember that pain. Maybe I'm just lucky like that.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 12

Next