TOPICS:
MAR 13, 2006 10:19 PM
Anton said:
I think it has something to do with sexy.
And clearly little to do with... no, let's just let it die. 
MAR 13, 2006 10:21 PM
Why are long pants long?
MAR 13, 2006 10:24 PM
StarBelliedBoy said:
Why are long pants long?
Now, this really deserves to die!
MAR 13, 2006 10:26 PM
MAR 13, 2006 10:29 PM
MAR 13, 2006 10:30 PM
Zork said:
pygmy said:
Zork said:
Dead_Ringer said:
They are cool to me 'cause I ain't got any, and AND because they tend to be attached to girls.
And these are both attributes which, presumably, do not apply to dead frogs.
emphasis mine
Zork has a collection of dead frogs?
Alas, he does not. He went out on a limb, assuming that dead frogs do not tend to be attached to girls, because he has never seen a dead frog attached to a girl, and further out on said limb, in assuming that Dead_Ringer does not possess any dead frogs, because, well, most people do not own dead frogs. He is not, in the usual sense of the phrase, an expert in dead frogs, though he would happily become so.
Edited to add: especially if it would make pygmy like him.
[Edited on Mar 13, 2006 by Zork]
but you DID assume he had dead frogs-- it's a double-negative-- he does not have the attribute of not posessing dead frogs.
how did this become so confusing?
ah, I meant to say that you accused dead_ringer, not zork, of having dead frogs.
anyways, I think that any obvious and generally distinct difference between males and females, cultural and physiological, tends to be sexualized, or at least has the potential to be.. As is whatever characteristic's respective antithesis (fetishizing long hair versus short hair, etc) 
[Edited on Mar 13, 2006 by pygmy]
MAR 13, 2006 10:30 PM
... because boobs are hot...
it's like asking why ice is cold. we know there is a reason, we just don't give a shit, lol.
i mean... why is water wet?
MAR 13, 2006 10:35 PM
Stirfry said:
... because boobs are hot...
it's like asking why ice is cold. we know there is a reason, we just don't give a shit, lol.
i mean... why is water wet?
water is wet because it's made out of water stupid
MAR 13, 2006 10:37 PM
pygmy said:
Jah said:
Stirfry said:
... because boobs are hot...
it's like asking why ice is cold. we know there is a reason, we just don't give a shit, lol.
i mean... why is water wet?
water is wet because it's made out of water stupid
water's not wet when it's frozen! 
Damn, I stand corrected.
Stirfry slap me.
MAR 13, 2006 10:40 PM
pygmy said:
Zork said:
pygmy said:
Zork said:
Dead_Ringer said:
They are cool to me 'cause I ain't got any, and AND because they tend to be attached to girls.
And these are both attributes which, presumably, do not apply to dead frogs.
emphasis mine
Zork has a collection of dead frogs?
Alas, he does not. He went out on a limb, assuming that dead frogs do not tend to be attached to girls, because he has never seen a dead frog attached to a girl, and further out on said limb, in assuming that Dead_Ringer does not possess any dead frogs, because, well, most people do not own dead frogs. He is not, in the usual sense of the phrase, an expert in dead frogs, though he would happily become so.
Edited to add: especially if it would make pygmy like him.
[Edited on Mar 13, 2006 by Zork]
but you DID assume he had dead frogs-- it's a double-negative-- he does not have the attribute of not posessing dead frogs.
how did this become so confusing?
ah, I meant to say that you accused dead_ringer, not zork, of having dead frogs.
I did not presume that dead_ringer actually had any dead frogs. I presumed that he did NOT have any, because most people do not have any. I agreed with him that clearly he had none, and further, that they did not tend to be attached to girls.
anyways, I think that any obvious and generally distinct difference between males and females, cultural and physiological, tends to be sexualized, or at least has the potential to be.. As is whatever characteristic's respective antithesis (fetishizing long hair versus short hair, etc)
[Edited on Mar 13, 2006 by pygmy]
No idea how we got on to hair length here, but I shave my head any time my hair gets long enough to need combing... and I might add, though I don't know how it relates to hair length, that I haven't been "sexualized" for quite a while, so any volunteers ought to raise their hands sometime soon...
MAR 13, 2006 10:44 PM
pygmy said:
Zork said:
pygmy said:
Zork said:
Dead_Ringer said:
They are cool to me 'cause I ain't got any, and AND because they tend to be attached to girls.
And these are both attributes which, presumably, do not apply to dead frogs.
emphasis mine
Zork has a collection of dead frogs?
Alas, he does not. He went out on a limb, assuming that dead frogs do not tend to be attached to girls, because he has never seen a dead frog attached to a girl, and further out on said limb, in assuming that Dead_Ringer does not possess any dead frogs, because, well, most people do not own dead frogs. He is not, in the usual sense of the phrase, an expert in dead frogs, though he would happily become so.
Edited to add: especially if it would make pygmy like him.
but you DID assume he had dead frogs-- it's a double-negative-- he does not have the attribute of not posessing dead frogs.
how did this become so confusing?
ah, I meant to say that you accused dead_ringer, not zork, of having dead frogs.
anyways, I think that any obvious and generally distinct difference between males and females, cultural and physiological, tends to be sexualized, or at least has the potential to be.. As is whatever characteristic's respective antithesis (fetishizing long hair versus short hair, etc) ]
Just for the record, I do not, nor have I ever, posessed, owned, or otherwise occupied the physical being of any frong, be it living or dead, as such terms are defined by Delaware Corporation Law.
I do enjoy human female breasts, however.
TheFuckOffKid
NEWSWIRE
Australia
MAR 13, 2006 10:18 PM