Sex Talk

TOPICS:

8/16/04

Posting Sexually Explicit Images [4]

1 HR

thigh highs anyone? [91]

1 HR

Mmmmm Corsets [21]

1 HR

self/mirror pics [27]

1 HR

Fuck me boots! [8]

3 HR

most head-turning SG tattoo? [6]

4 HR

Thank god for the pussy shots from behind. [221]

5 HR

Your Favorite Pornstar [15]

15 HR

Hips like Cinderella [25]

21 HR

Brunettes with light eyes [16]

21 HR

Colorful hair is hot! [20]

21 HR

Topless in jeans appreciation thread [44]

21 HR

Legs that go allll the way up [16]

21 HR

Natural Boobs [71]

21 HR

Redheads are hot! [79]

21 HR

The Close-Up [7]

22 HR

Curvy girl appreciation thread. [10]

5/26/12

How many people have you really... [86]

5/26/12

how long has it been? [138]

5/26/12

Let's hear it for "panties around the ankles / knees" shots! [12]

5/26/12

Random sex places! [2]

5/26/12

Ever broken furniture? [3]

5/26/12

pain? Biting and scratching? [2]

5/26/12

Girls with Glasses 04 [62]

5/25/12

Beautiful SG Eyes [52]

5/25/12

Worst pick up lines.... [12]

5/25/12

Can SG count to 10?

5/25/12

Foot stuff [40]

5/24/12

gay? bi? straight? [38]

5/24/12

Back to school special [4]

5/24/12

porn star name [10]

5/24/12

Men who REALLY ENJOY teh cunnilingus? Raise your hands. [35]

5/22/12

Music playing during sex? [7]

5/22/12

Camel Toes,..Yay or Nay? [6]

5/21/12

Sex Dreams... Or dreams about sex... Let's here them

5/19/12

GIRLS: Characters You'd Fuck But NOT The Actors [4]

5/18/12

"Grand Old Party"

5/17/12

SG Blonde Bombshells [3]

5/17/12

Beautiful Smiles [15]

5/17/12

PAGE:

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

... 197

retweet

Natural Boobs

PAGE:

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

... 71

epicus_doomicus

Arcata, CA

June 2005

FEB 01, 2006 07:00 PM

Coi said:

SHITSICLE said:
Brixton?

Brixton had a reduction!

what? so i dont count on EITHER thread!??!

this is boob-segregation!

Brixton

SUICIDEGIRL

Connecticut, USA

FEB 01, 2006 07:02 PM

unhallowed said:

Coi said:

SHITSICLE said:
Brixton?

Brixton had a reduction!

what? so i dont count on EITHER thread!??!

this is boob-segregation!

DAMN STARIGHT! fuck a whole buncha i dont belong on eitehr thread.

if someone loved me, i'd be on BOTH! MAUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

epicus_doomicus

Arcata, CA

June 2005

FEB 01, 2006 07:08 PM

this is boob-segregation!

DAMN STARIGHT! fuck a whole buncha i dont belong on eitehr thread.

if someone loved me, i'd be on BOTH! MAUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

people are wierd aren't they?
this is a site based on women, their appreciation, their individualism, and well, in subtle forms, their boobs!!!

i think people need to have reductions in their egos and personal opinions (that's my opnion, and yas you can quote me on it!-so, i am a hypocrite....)

Argene

Pittsburgh, PA

June 2004

FEB 01, 2006 07:47 PM

PaulNikon said:

I am secretly in love with her. So Shhhhhh.

Who is this

sweeneytodd

Charlotte, NC

November 2003

FEB 01, 2006 08:07 PM

Furious_D said:

Salome said:

While implants, depending on how well they're done, can be aesthetically pleasing, it's distracting and disappointing to grab hold of a lovely big breast and find a hackey sack inside it.

And you'll totally get slapped when you try to kick it, too.

Worst strip club experience ever.

Ha!

Fatality

SUICIDEGIRL

USA

FEB 01, 2006 10:09 PM

L_aerophile said:

PaulNikon said:

I am secretly in love with her. So Shhhhhh.

Who is this

Right click on the photo to go to the image properties and it will tell you.

That is EmilyEve

Rigel

ASSPARTY

California, USA

FEB 01, 2006 10:20 PM

explain to me how reduced boobs don't count. because last time i checked they were still natural in content.

MrMuller

Detroit, MI

March 2004

FEB 01, 2006 10:34 PM

Rigel said:
explain to me how reduced boobs don't count. because last time i checked they were still natural in content.

Yea, I agree. I think if anything she belongs here much more than she belongs in the fake thread. But really, I think the threads just need to be joined together.

kal_72

Australia

February 2005

FEB 01, 2006 10:41 PM

given they were reduced they must have hu-mung-ous to start with... they look feekin great as they are now.

Rigel

ASSPARTY

California, USA

FEB 01, 2006 10:45 PM

Rigel said:
explain to me how reduced boobs don't count. because last time i checked they were still natural in content.

Yea, I agree. I think if anything she belongs here much more than she belongs in the fake thread. But really, I think the threads just need to be joined together.

i just don't quite see how she'd wind up in the fake thread anyway.

Salome

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

FEB 01, 2006 10:47 PM

I'd just like to say that I love Brixton's boobs.

MrMuller

Detroit, MI

March 2004

FEB 01, 2006 10:49 PM

Rigel said:

Rigel said:
explain to me how reduced boobs don't count. because last time i checked they were still natural in content.

Yea, I agree. I think if anything she belongs here much more than she belongs in the fake thread. But really, I think the threads just need to be joined together.

i just don't quite see how she'd wind up in the fake thread anyway.

Me neither. But I can see why someone might say she doesn't belong in the "natural" thread. But I don't agree.

Nixon

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

FEB 01, 2006 11:39 PM

PaulNikon said:
I wonder what era of boobs we are talking about, Nixon? Not trying to argue with you. But the silicone filled implants of the mid-1990's looked and fealt better than the saline of today. Just my opinion.

Perhaps we should take this one back to the falsies thread and look at some photos..I've always found that the silicones caused so much more scarring, as well as refusing to move at all and sitting very high on the pecs forever (whereas the saline ones continue to settle in and soften over time, and have little scarring because the insertion is so much smaller.) But this is really not the thread for that. This is the thread for
RavenIsis

[Edited on Feb 01, 2006 by Nixon]

epicus_doomicus

Arcata, CA

June 2005

FEB 01, 2006 11:45 PM

Nixon said:

PaulNikon said:
I wonder what era of boobs we are talking about, Nixon? Not trying to argue with you. But the silicone filled implants of the mid-1990's looked and fealt better than the saline of today. Just my opinion.

Perhaps we should take this one back to the falsies thread and look at some photos..I've always found that the silicones caused so much more scarring, as well as refusing to move at all and sitting very high on the pecs forever (whereas the saline ones continue to settle in and soften over time, and have little scarring because the insertion is so much smaller.) But this is really not the thread for that. This is the thread for
RavenIsis

[Edited on Feb 01, 2006 by Nixon]

i agree, and for Brixton (of course!)

Katrina

SUICIDEGIRL

Sweden

FEB 02, 2006 10:26 AM

Coi said:

SHITSICLE said:
Brixton?

Brixton had a reduction!

what? so i dont count on EITHER thread!??!

How about having a thread of your own?

PaulNikon

Palm Bay, FL

February 2003

FEB 02, 2006 01:50 PM

Calypso

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

FEB 02, 2006 01:57 PM

Woo-hoo for natural boobs!!!

PaulNikon

Palm Bay, FL

February 2003

FEB 03, 2006 02:53 PM

Please. Less blah blah blah. More BOOBS. Think of the children.

MrMuller

Detroit, MI

March 2004

FEB 03, 2006 03:11 PM

I concur with both PaulNikon, and Calypso's statements.

Brixton

SUICIDEGIRL

Connecticut, USA

FEB 03, 2006 05:55 PM

kal_72 said:

given they were reduced they must have hu-mung-ous to start with... they look feekin great as they are now.

they were double D's. righ tnow, they're a C. a large C.

essentially, i told my plastic surgeon to go as small as possible while retaining my ability to breastfeed. and he didn't want to chop em off.
(i had really pretty boobs, but i figured i might as well get em smaller while i had the money. i did not want to bother with sagginess.)

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA

July 2004

FEB 03, 2006 06:03 PM

kal_72 said:

given they were reduced they must have hu-mung-ous to start with... they look feekin great as they are now.

they were double D's. righ tnow, they're a C. a large C.

essentially, i told my plastic surgeon to go as small as possible while retaining my ability to breastfeed. and he didn't want to chop em off.
(i had really pretty boobs, but i figured i might as well get em smaller while i had the money. i did not want to bother with sagginess.)

Your plastic surgeon apparently thinks "small"="big"

Zork

Victoria, BC

August 2003

FEB 03, 2006 06:29 PM

PaulNikon said:
Please. Less blah blah blah. More BOOBS. Think of the children.

Well, I must admit that "children" isn't the first thought that comes to mind upon viewing this image. Though children are sometimes the consequence of the sort of thoughts I was having . My main comment, though, is that Wendy really is lovely. Like you didn't already know that...

PaulNikon

Palm Bay, FL

February 2003

FEB 05, 2006 06:58 PM

Mary Carey

Roethke

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

FEB 07, 2006 07:11 PM

She looks so uncomfortable in that picture, Paul.

Maybe she always looks like something is holding a bazooka behind the camera.

Calypso

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

FEB 07, 2006 11:29 PM

Roethke said:
She looks so uncomfortable in that picture, Paul.

Maybe she always looks like something is holding a bazooka behind the camera.

No, she's just incredibly retarded.

PAGE:

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

... 71