Sex Talk

TOPICS:

12/31/04

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100

 ... 197

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

Ebolarama

Ebolarama

Saint Charles, MO
November 2004

DEC 28, 2004 01:38 AM

I do not understand what it's use for our bodies.....meh....

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

DEC 28, 2004 01:55 AM

Check it.


Whatever the explanation for the loss of hair, another explanation is needed for why men and women kept dense hair in three places: their heads, armpits and pubes. In particular, those who believe in the parasite theory must explain why humans merely shed some of their hair and not all of it, since the head, armpits and pubic areas are the very regions where human parasitic infections tend to occur.

The answer is sex, of course. David Stoddart, an olfactory biologist with Australia's Antarctic programme, points out that armpit and pubic hair grows just where the major scent glands are to be found. Hair is a means of wafting this scent about. Thus a tuft of hair allows humans, like other animals, to advertise to mates that something of interest is happening on the skin below.

MisterGraves

MisterGraves

Portland, OR
November 2003

DEC 28, 2004 01:56 AM

Or the hair on our heads. Bleh.

The only hair that makes any sense is the hair in our noses.

MisterGraves

MisterGraves

Portland, OR
November 2003

DEC 28, 2004 01:58 AM

TheFuckOffKid said:
Check it.


Whatever the explanation for the loss of hair, another explanation is needed for why men and women kept dense hair in three places: their heads, armpits and pubes. In particular, those who believe in the parasite theory must explain why humans merely shed some of their hair and not all of it, since the head, armpits and pubic areas are the very regions where human parasitic infections tend to occur.

The answer is sex, of course. David Stoddart, an olfactory biologist with Australia's Antarctic programme, points out that armpit and pubic hair grows just where the major scent glands are to be found. Hair is a means of wafting this scent about. Thus a tuft of hair allows humans, like other animals, to advertise to mates that something of interest is happening on the skin below.



And our pubes are the only places left that we don't cover with deodorant, hair spray or perfume. Interesting.

Everybody, let's sniff crotches!

SomethingStupid

SomethingStupid

North Hollywood, CA
March 2004

DEC 28, 2004 01:58 AM

xer0yne said:
Or the hair on our heads. Bleh.


Well, you lose most of your heat through your head, so I'm fairly sure that keeps you warm. Or it would if we didn't cut it short.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

DEC 28, 2004 02:01 AM

xer0yne said:

TheFuckOffKid said:
Check it.


Whatever the explanation for the loss of hair, another explanation is needed for why men and women kept dense hair in three places: their heads, armpits and pubes. In particular, those who believe in the parasite theory must explain why humans merely shed some of their hair and not all of it, since the head, armpits and pubic areas are the very regions where human parasitic infections tend to occur.

The answer is sex, of course. David Stoddart, an olfactory biologist with Australia's Antarctic programme, points out that armpit and pubic hair grows just where the major scent glands are to be found. Hair is a means of wafting this scent about. Thus a tuft of hair allows humans, like other animals, to advertise to mates that something of interest is happening on the skin below.



And our pubes are the only places left that we don't cover with deodorant, hair spray or perfume. Interesting.

Everybody, let's sniff crotches!


But in The Modern World, we barely get to smell each other until we've already decided we want to get it on down there ...which is one reason why pubic hair is so expendable these days ...

SomethingStupid

SomethingStupid

North Hollywood, CA
March 2004

DEC 28, 2004 02:12 AM

Okay now that I've read the thing...though the article doesn't mention it, I'm not convinced with the explanation of hair remaining there because of sex. We lost our ability to detect phermones a long time ago, so they really should be useless. I guess the glands still exist, but it seems odd. Also, if the hair on your head stays on because of sex...well that doesn't really make sense, evolution-wise. I can understand the glands thing if the logic is that our bodies don't know we can't detect phermones anymore, but there's no way anyone's body could know that we find hair on the head pleasing to the eye.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

DEC 28, 2004 02:41 AM

I think we just need a sense of smell for the theory to have some relevance. That is, we've arrived at a point now where most body hair is pointless and redundant. Hence, many of us tend to get rid of a lot of it.

Head hair may be different -- it has the practical purpose of helping keep body heat, and it has the visual purpose of being attractive and symbolic of youthful vigour.

I don't know what "sense", evolution-wise, you refer to. Peacocks have fancy feathers that have no practical purpose except to attract mates. And, evolutionarily speaking, that's a very practical purpose.

SomethingStupid

SomethingStupid

North Hollywood, CA
March 2004

DEC 28, 2004 02:56 AM

You're right about the hair thing, I guess. I wasn't thinking that way because I'm sort of an idiot. But the smell thing I'm still not buying. I may not be understanding this correctly, but basically the idea is that hair spreads a scent that turns us on. My understanding was that that was more what phermones did, and that that method of choosing a mate has become so antiquated that we've lost our ability to detect them. If it is now simply a universal scent put out when you're horny and/or fertile, I'd think we'd all be pretty familiar with it.

I've got to be misunderstanding something, though, as this guy is an olfactory specialist and obviously has more of an idea of what's going on with your nose than I. But it still doesn't seem to me to be something that would make any difference.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

DEC 28, 2004 03:07 AM

I don't think the argument is that the pubic hair helps spread pheremones long distances. I think it's simpler -- that in more primitive times, sex was driven by smell as much as by other things, and that sexual smell was "trapped" by the pubic hair.

(Particularly since the sexual smell had to compete with all the other smells of what would have been a rather unhygenic lifestyle by modern standards.)

Al

Al

SUICIDEGIRL

Christmas Island

DEC 28, 2004 03:13 AM

Dude, that guy is so wrong. Everyone knows that pubic hair only exists to get in our teeth when we're giving the oral action.

TAFKASP

TAFKASP

Oakland, CA
June 2003

DEC 28, 2004 03:16 AM

After looking at this picture of the lovely DebraJean, does it really matter? smile

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

DEC 28, 2004 03:18 AM

Al said:
Dude, that guy is so wrong. Everyone knows that pubic hair only exists to get in our teeth when we're giving the oral action.


Still evolution in action. Nature providing the best dental floss.

SomethingStupid

SomethingStupid

North Hollywood, CA
March 2004

DEC 28, 2004 03:24 AM

Al said:
Dude, that guy is so wrong. Everyone knows that pubic hair only exists to get in our teeth when we're giving the oral action.


It was funny to me that that wasn't mentioned as a reason one might get a bikini wax.

And I really don't want to continue breaking this into further tedium, so if I'm still curious tomorrow and remember, I'll look up a bit more on the scent thing.

Pirate_Romeo

Pirate_Romeo

Oklahoma City, OK
November 2004

DEC 28, 2004 03:51 AM

just be glad it's curly. Otherwise you'd poke your eyes out! tongue

Hyperboy

Hyperboy

I'm lost
June 2004

DEC 28, 2004 05:13 AM

Al said:
Dude, that guy is so wrong. Everyone knows that pubic hair only exists to get in our teeth when we're giving the oral action.



fully agree biggrin

fiendish

fiendish

USA
December 2002

DEC 28, 2004 06:17 AM

to keep ya stuff warm confused

though sorta pointless at this point with the invention of underwear and clothes.

eventually we will evolve into hairless 20 finger weaklings.
damn internet skull

[Edited on Dec 28, 2004 by fiendish]

zyryx

zyryx

Tyler, TX
April 2004

DEC 28, 2004 07:15 AM

to prevent chaffing of the penis on warm sweaty days

Oracle

Oracle

Courtenay, BC
September 2003

DEC 28, 2004 07:32 AM

i think it gives us something extra to shave into cool little designs biggrin

Fahrvergnugen

Fahrvergnugen

Calgary, AB
December 2003

DEC 28, 2004 09:00 AM

If i had holes in my pockets, i'd definately run my fingers threw my hair

Mallory

Mallory

SUICIDEGIRL

Connecticut, USA

DEC 28, 2004 09:07 AM

it keeps my lips a secret!!

Fahrvergnugen

Fahrvergnugen

Calgary, AB
December 2003

DEC 28, 2004 09:14 AM

I creeped you're page in hopes of finding that secret shocked

relapsed_eric

relapsed_eric

Minneapolis, MN
February 2004

DEC 28, 2004 09:20 AM

it's hard to believe men and women even considered hooking up 100, 500, 1000 years ago...scabrious, unwashed, dreadlocked pubes... it had to be a labor of love.

Oracle

Oracle

Courtenay, BC
September 2003

DEC 28, 2004 09:36 AM

Mallory said:
it keeps my lips a secret!!




we are talking about pubes not goatee's...

oh wait....

Mallory

Mallory

SUICIDEGIRL

Connecticut, USA

DEC 28, 2004 09:42 AM

Das_Fotograf said:
I creeped you're page in hopes of finding that secret shocked



what?

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next