Sex Talk

TOPICS:

11/15/10

I'm afraid to show my boyfriend my vagina. [2]

11/14/10

How do you feel about the transgendered? [2]

11/12/10

Ladies first [2]

11/9/10

I want to do filthy, naughty things with the Progressive cashier [8]

11/2/10

10/28/10

10/28/10

10/28/10

the shortest sex that you had ? [4]

10/28/10

So here is a simple story for strippers and non-strippers a like. [2]

10/25/10

Dear Person I Fucked Badly, ...I'm sorry. [23]

10/24/10

Do something for the girls! [2]

10/16/10

feeling unattractive, fat and unwanted.

10/15/10

losing first virginity.. [2]

10/15/10

Boys - trimming your short & curlies - how short? [3]

10/13/10

10/10/10

Nipples! To mierce or not to pierce?! [4]

10/8/10

Like sand through an hourglass.. [3]

10/6/10

Yolk Exchange aka 'Bouche a Bouche'

10/5/10

Sex while pregnant

10/1/10

The Side Boob Hour [6]

9/29/10

9/29/10

Consumer Reports: Condoms

9/29/10

Does age matter to you...? [3]

9/29/10

Kinkiest fetish you will admit to. [15]

9/27/10

Premature ejaculation . . .

9/24/10

2 documentaries that both genders should watch should watch [5]

9/24/10

Most Muscular Calves

9/23/10

9/19/10

9/16/10

Best sex scene in a non-porn film? [4]

9/15/10

You know what I hate? [3]

9/14/10

My fantasy scene

jackXsansXsally

9/14/10

9/12/10

Is it cheating.... [3]

9/11/10

Homewrecking: Absolutely wrong, or expected competition?

9/9/10

Any advice on approaching a girl about a threesome?

9/9/10

Boys kissing is hot. [34]

9/8/10

Is it better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all? [3]

9/6/10

Guess Her Muff [2]

9/1/10

Who is the *last* SG you masturbated to? [109]

PAGE:

1 ...

8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

... 198

retweet

Guess Her Muff

PAGE:

1 | 2

dontpooyourself

Austin, TX

March 2005

SEP 05, 2010 10:12 AM

link removed by moderator

Ha this site makes me laugh, you get to make an inference as to how a lady keeps her bush and then find out if you were right! Sometimes they're kinda haggard, sometimes not, but it's almost always interesting.

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA

March 2004

SEP 05, 2010 01:48 PM

Huh. Seeing them in normal/candid shots first makes the nude pics even hotter.

Nixon

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

SEP 05, 2010 02:24 PM

Wow. That site is ungodly creepy. At least half of those nude shots were pretty obviously never meant for anyone to see, and I cannot imagine permission was given to use them. I know that sounds like leaping to conclusions, but those are not the kind of nude pictures the vast majority of girls would allow to be posted.

Evilgasm

Netherlands

April 2007

SEP 05, 2010 02:30 PM

+1 I think that site is fueld by a lot of pissed of ex-husbands/boyfriends. Not cool.

dontpooyourself

Austin, TX

March 2005

SEP 05, 2010 02:59 PM

I guess I figured most of them were call girls or something

Agy

SUICIDEGIRL

Ontario, Canada

SEP 05, 2010 03:16 PM

dontpooyourself said:
I guess I figured most of them were call girls or something

Why/how did you figure that?

Unfortunately, I don't believe there is much consent involved for the girls with sites/blogs like this.

Vindice

United Kingdom

February 2005

SEP 05, 2010 05:06 PM

dontpooyourself said:
I guess I figured most of them were call girls or something

I'm not sure that many call girls would generally let clients take photos of them. If they did, and the clients posted the photos online, that would be a massive breach of confidence!

Rainer24

Chicago, IL

January 2008

SEP 05, 2010 06:25 PM

Nixon said:
Wow. That site is ungodly creepy. At least half of those nude shots were pretty obviously never meant for anyone to see, and I cannot imagine permission was given to use them. I know that sounds like leaping to conclusions, but those are not the kind of nude pictures the vast majority of girls would allow to be posted.

Yeah, it creeped me out. Nothing alluring about seeing pictures that have only made it into the public domain via a vindictive jerk.

Foxtrot_Uniform

Phoenix, AZ

January 2009

SEP 05, 2010 08:07 PM

I didn't click on the link because I suspected in would be crawling with viruses, but after reading the comments the sight sounds way too creepy.

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

SEP 05, 2010 08:10 PM

dontpooyourself said:

Ha this site makes me laugh, you get to make an inference as to how a lady keeps her bush and then find out if you were right! Sometimes they're kinda haggard, sometimes not, but it's almost always interesting.

1. Nixon is right, that site is creepy and a lot of those pictures were probably posted without permission.

2. Calling someone's genitals "haggard" is gross.

Niobe

I'm lost

April 2003

SEP 05, 2010 08:57 PM

dontpooyourself said:
I guess I figured most of them were call girls or something

One of those girls was wearing what looked like a wedding dress in one of the before pictures.......

Yeah, creepy site. Very creepy.

StrongDar

USA

April 2010

SEP 05, 2010 09:04 PM

L O L

At my convenience... sheesh

I had to stop - and I'm a creepy sexaholic. Reallly creepy.

IDGAS

Portland, ME

March 2004

SEP 05, 2010 09:10 PM

Morgan said:

dontpooyourself said:

Ha this site makes me laugh, you get to make an inference as to how a lady keeps her bush and then find out if you were right! Sometimes they're kinda haggard, sometimes not, but it's almost always interesting.

1. Nixon is right, that site is creepy and a lot of those pictures were probably posted without permission.

2. Calling someone's genitals "haggard" is gross.

Calling someone's genitals haggard is rude. Gross is describing someone's genitals as haggis-like.

meatpieboy

Korea, D.P.R.

June 2004

SEP 05, 2010 09:12 PM

IDGAS said:

Morgan said:

dontpooyourself said:

Ha this site makes me laugh, you get to make an inference as to how a lady keeps her bush and then find out if you were right! Sometimes they're kinda haggard, sometimes not, but it's almost always interesting.

1. Nixon is right, that site is creepy and a lot of those pictures were probably posted without permission.

2. Calling someone's genitals "haggard" is gross.

Calling someone's genitals haggard is rude. Gross is describing someone's genitals as haggis-like.

I think he's referring to the women themselves.

SnakePlissken

Corvallis, OR

December 2002

SEP 05, 2010 09:45 PM

Morgan said:

dontpooyourself said:

Ha this site makes me laugh, you get to make an inference as to how a lady keeps her bush and then find out if you were right! Sometimes they're kinda haggard, sometimes not, but it's almost always interesting.

1. Nixon is right, that site is creepy and a lot of those pictures were probably posted without permission.

2. Calling someone's genitals "haggard" is gross.

I'll admit sometimes my genitals are haggard. Once my balls stayed up until 4am playing Castlevania II when work started at 8. Believe me, that description fit them to a T by 10:30.

CoyoteMike

Iowa City, IA

May 2006

SEP 05, 2010 09:46 PM

SnakePlissken said:

Morgan said:

dontpooyourself said:

Ha this site makes me laugh, you get to make an inference as to how a lady keeps her bush and then find out if you were right! Sometimes they're kinda haggard, sometimes not, but it's almost always interesting.

1. Nixon is right, that site is creepy and a lot of those pictures were probably posted without permission.

2. Calling someone's genitals "haggard" is gross.

I'll admit sometimes my genitals are haggard. Once my balls stayed up until 4am playing Castlevania II when work started at 8. Believe me, that description fit them to a T by 10:30.

Next time, give them some coffee and a fresh shave before sending them out into the world.

dontpooyourself

Austin, TX

March 2005

SEP 05, 2010 10:58 PM

Agy said:

dontpooyourself said:
I guess I figured most of them were call girls or something

Why/how did you figure that?

Unfortunately, I don't believe there is much consent involved for the girls with sites/blogs like this.

I just based my assumption on their clothes and general appearance, and also upon the fact they're still up there. If all these women are pissed off and didn't give anyone permission I absolutely agree they oughta be taken down, I just thought they didn't care. I also wasn't trying to suggest this was a good site for porn or anything, just that it amuses me to find out how good I am at guessing how peoples pubic hair is kept.

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

SEP 05, 2010 11:01 PM

dontpooyourself said:
I just based my assumption on their clothes and general appearance

What exactly about their clothes and general appearance made you think that? Most of them are just wearing boring outfits.

dontpooyourself

Austin, TX

March 2005

SEP 05, 2010 11:04 PM

I thought they looked cheaply dressed and had shitty hair and make up. Ha I apparently didn't read into this all that much.

Thistle

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

SEP 05, 2010 11:49 PM

dontpooyourself said:
I thought they looked cheaply dressed and had shitty hair and make up. Ha I apparently didn't read into this all that much.

And that equals call girl to you? Wow.

dontpooyourself

Austin, TX

March 2005

SEP 06, 2010 12:10 AM

Not exclusively that, but the cheap clothing and how poorly kept some of them are combined with the fact that they allowed the pictures to be taken and then posted leads me to think they're hookers. It's not like every time I see a lady looking poorly I think she's interested in sex for money...

Nixon

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

SEP 06, 2010 01:37 AM

dontpooyourself said:
Not exclusively that, but the cheap clothing and how poorly kept some of them are combined with the fact that they allowed the pictures to be taken and then posted leads me to think they're hookers. It's not like every time I see a lady looking poorly I think she's interested in sex for money...

Um, one of the first ones is clearly in her wedding dress. At her wedding.

They are 'poorly kept' because these aren't posed photos of professional models made for internet use.

They haven't asked for these photos to be taken down because they don't know they are there. It's not the sort of site most girls stumble on in their random porn searches. I spend a whole lot of time on the internet- and looking at porn- and this is the first time I had ever seen this site. There are THOUSANDS of amateur sites out there. With no name or anything to link it to, you would never know unless someone told you.

dontpooyourself

Austin, TX

March 2005

SEP 06, 2010 01:57 AM

Yeah, I guess it's entirely possible they don't know. I'm not trying to convince anyone otherwise, I'm only trying to convey what I enjoy about that site, which maybe I didn't do the best job of representing, maybe I'm just a disgusting creep, I dunno. But, the way I subjectively view this site isn't in any sexual way, I'm not getting off on seeing any of these women. I'm mature enough to disassociate nudity from sexuality, and I think it's funny to say, "Oh, that chick definitely has a landing strip!" and then find out if I'm right or not.

CoyoteMike

Iowa City, IA

May 2006

SEP 06, 2010 06:17 AM

dontpooyourself said:
Yeah, I guess it's entirely possible they don't know. I'm not trying to convince anyone otherwise, I'm only trying to convey what I enjoy about that site, which maybe I didn't do the best job of representing, maybe I'm just a disgusting creep, I dunno. But, the way I subjectively view this site isn't in any sexual way, I'm not getting off on seeing any of these women. I'm mature enough to disassociate nudity from sexuality, and I think it's funny to say, "Oh, that chick definitely has a landing strip!" and then find out if I'm right or not.

If you check the site's FAQ, he pretty much admits that they don't know.

dontpooyourself

Austin, TX

March 2005

SEP 06, 2010 08:13 AM

Coyotemike said:
If you check the site's FAQ, he pretty much admits that they don't know.

Since I've never shared a naked picture of any of my ex's with anybody I suppose I'm inclined to hope other people are as respectful with theirs. Some folks have some pretty wayward moral compasses though.

PAGE:

1 | 2