Sex Talk

TOPICS:

3/8/10
1/9/10

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

 ... 197

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

meatpieboy

meatpieboy

Korea, D.P.R.
June 2004

JAN 21, 2010 10:06 PM

Female ejaculation banned from film in Australia.

The Classification Board have determined that female ejaculation is not a real event and therefore all issue from a women’s vagina is piss and therefore covered under the parameters in the Guidelines for ‘golden showers’.



Apparently the Classification Board will now consider scenes containing female ejaculation to be "refused classification" and therefore prohibited.

(I couldn't resist posting this, but it should be noted that the article I link contains only hearsay. Searches on the issue produced only links back to the linked article. Also, mods may think this is better placed in the Sex Forum?)

Lemonkid

Lemonkid

Canada
May 2003

JAN 21, 2010 10:16 PM

I'm guessing there's no women on the Classification Board?

Accuser

Accuser

Scottsdale, AZ
October 2006

JAN 21, 2010 10:29 PM

I just wanted to post in this thread.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

JAN 21, 2010 10:40 PM

I'm sure this is going to piss some people off.

Otoki

Otoki

SUICIDEGIRL

Minnesota, USA

JAN 21, 2010 10:44 PM

MrCrisp said:
I'm sure this is going to piss some people off.



You win the thread.

Pip

Pip

Framingham, MA
OLD SKOOL

JAN 22, 2010 06:16 AM

Anyone else remember when Australia tried to tax tampons? That was an epic protest.

Cash

Cash

USA
OLD SKOOL

JAN 22, 2010 06:30 AM

666Irish said:

Otoki said:

MrCrisp said:
I'm sure this is going to piss some people off.



You win the thread.



As they say, better to be pissed off then pissed on...



Unless, you know...you're into that.

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

JAN 22, 2010 06:36 AM

magpieboy said:

The Classification Board have determined that female ejaculation is not a real event and therefore all issue from a women’s vagina is piss and therefore covered under the parameters in the Guidelines for ‘golden showers’.



Its a crying shame Australia's 'I love golden showers' lobby isn't more powerful.

Seriously, I don't want to pretend like I know enough about the whole debate surrounding the whole concept of squirting to make any kind of statement of fact, but take the Classification Board's ruling at face value & say, just say that they're totally right. How come golden shower fetishists can't get their porn breakfast on?

People's puritanical instincts make sense to me, there's a lot of porn out there that I find objectionable on any number of visceral or logical levels, but I'm not walking around with a giant rubber BANNED stamp in my hand.

What's up with you Australia? Explain your objections to a Healthy Porn Breakfast to me.

semiretiredpunk

semiretiredpunk

USA
March 2007

JAN 22, 2010 03:15 PM

ChrisSick said:

magpieboy said:

The Classification Board have determined that female ejaculation is not a real event and therefore all issue from a women’s vagina is piss and therefore covered under the parameters in the Guidelines for ‘golden showers’.



Its a crying shame Australia's 'I love golden showers' lobby isn't more powerful.

Seriously, I don't want to pretend like I know enough about the whole debate surrounding the whole concept of squirting to make any kind of statement of fact, but take the Classification Board's ruling at face value & say, just say that they're totally right. How come golden shower fetishists can't get their porn breakfast on?

People's puritanical instincts make sense to me, there's a lot of porn out there that I find objectionable on any number of visceral or logical levels, but I'm not walking around with a giant rubber BANNED stamp in my hand.

What's up with you Australia? Explain your objections to a Healthy Porn Breakfast to me.



While I'm completely against banning most kinky porn, I can see maybe a warning label required for lots of fetishes. At least so you can know what you're getting into. I remember clicking a link to a gallery of a scat orgy once not knowing it and it completely ruined my mood.
(for at least five minutes)
I've also seen plenty of peeing in what seems on the surface to be otherwise fairly mainstream fare, and it annoyed me.
Again, I'm generally against censorship, but am all for a warning.
surreal

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

JAN 22, 2010 04:00 PM

semiretiredpunk said:

ChrisSick said:

magpieboy said:

The Classification Board have determined that female ejaculation is not a real event and therefore all issue from a women’s vagina is piss and therefore covered under the parameters in the Guidelines for ‘golden showers’.



Its a crying shame Australia's 'I love golden showers' lobby isn't more powerful.

Seriously, I don't want to pretend like I know enough about the whole debate surrounding the whole concept of squirting to make any kind of statement of fact, but take the Classification Board's ruling at face value & say, just say that they're totally right. How come golden shower fetishists can't get their porn breakfast on?

People's puritanical instincts make sense to me, there's a lot of porn out there that I find objectionable on any number of visceral or logical levels, but I'm not walking around with a giant rubber BANNED stamp in my hand.

What's up with you Australia? Explain your objections to a Healthy Porn Breakfast to me.



While I'm completely against banning most kinky porn, I can see maybe a warning label required for lots of fetishes. At least so you can know what you're getting into. I remember clicking a link to a gallery of a scat orgy once not knowing it and it completely ruined my mood.
(for at least five minutes)
I've also seen plenty of peeing in what seems on the surface to be otherwise fairly mainstream fare, and it annoyed me.
Again, I'm generally against censorship, but am all for a warning.
surreal



Yeah, people with non-mainstream sexual fetishes should be made to feel as marginalized as a smoker at a day care just so your poor eyes don't have to be offended. I'm pretty sure the non-piss-porn-lovers of the world will get over that ONE time they accidentally clicked on the wrong video link.

Also, what the fuck does any of this have to do with Australia a) deciding that anything that comes out from between a woman's legs that isn't blood or a baby must be piss & b) that Australia bans non-mainstream-fetish porn?

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JAN 22, 2010 04:17 PM

ChrisSick said:
Its a crying shame Australia's 'I love golden showers' lobby isn't more powerful.

....

What's up with you Australia? Explain your objections to a Healthy Porn Breakfast to me.


The US has a strange ongoing battle between its libertarian free-speech tradition and its puritan history.

So do we.

In a sense, our puritan lobby is "less" powerful, except that we don't have the same kind of First Amendment protection that's available in the US. So our puritans can, in effect, achieve more with less.

I live pretty close to the heart of Sydney's kink culture, walking distance from brothels, strip clubs, and burlesque and fetish venues. I expect I could purchase lots of stuff that's refused classification from some of the adult shops nearby in Kings Cross. That doesn't make me less annoyed about the legal situation though.

For more info on the whole ongoing situation: http://www.refused-classification.com/

The Eros Foundation (mentioned in the OP's link) does good work trying to keep up the good fight.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

JAN 22, 2010 04:32 PM

so, you've got recreational materials that have been banned by the government but which are easily available on almost any street corner? damn, maybe the US should have declared a war on porn instead of a war on drugs. at least you don't have entire cities burning themselves to the ground over porn just across your southern border. (alternatively, i suppose the US could look into getting an ocean across the whole of our southern border.)

meatpieboy

meatpieboy

Korea, D.P.R.
June 2004

JAN 22, 2010 05:48 PM

motorfirebox said:
so, you've got recreational materials that have been banned by the government but which are easily available on almost any street corner? damn, maybe the US should have declared a war on porn instead of a war on drugs. at least you don't have entire cities burning themselves to the ground over porn just across your southern border. (alternatively, i suppose the US could look into getting an ocean across the whole of our southern border.)



MAN FOUND DEAD IN ARIZONA DESERT WITH 18 HARDCORE PORNOGRAPHY DVDS IN COLON

toothpickmoe

toothpickmoe

Los Angeles, CA
May 2004

JAN 22, 2010 07:29 PM

MrCrisp said:
I'm sure this is going to piss some people off.



zoom image

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
I swear you post this kind of shit just so I'll dig that up.


Hailstorm100

Hailstorm100

Australia
January 2010

JAN 23, 2010 12:45 PM

I'm sure Australian's would still be able to find squirting videos online, of course those that are into it anyway

Renea

Renea

Holly Springs, NC
November 2009

JAN 23, 2010 03:06 PM

wait... squirting isn't real?

semiretiredpunk

semiretiredpunk

USA
March 2007

JAN 23, 2010 07:23 PM

It's only not real in Australia.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JAN 23, 2010 07:36 PM

semiretiredpunk said:
It's only not real in Australia.



We're like Strawberry Fields.

semiretiredpunk

semiretiredpunk

USA
March 2007

JAN 23, 2010 07:42 PM

ChrisSick said:

semiretiredpunk said:

ChrisSick said:

magpieboy said:

The Classification Board have determined that female ejaculation is not a real event and therefore all issue from a women’s vagina is piss and therefore covered under the parameters in the Guidelines for ‘golden showers’.



Its a crying shame Australia's 'I love golden showers' lobby isn't more powerful.

Seriously, I don't want to pretend like I know enough about the whole debate surrounding the whole concept of squirting to make any kind of statement of fact, but take the Classification Board's ruling at face value & say, just say that they're totally right. How come golden shower fetishists can't get their porn breakfast on?

People's puritanical instincts make sense to me, there's a lot of porn out there that I find objectionable on any number of visceral or logical levels, but I'm not walking around with a giant rubber BANNED stamp in my hand.

What's up with you Australia? Explain your objections to a Healthy Porn Breakfast to me.



While I'm completely against banning most kinky porn, I can see maybe a warning label required for lots of fetishes. At least so you can know what you're getting into. I remember clicking a link to a gallery of a scat orgy once not knowing it and it completely ruined my mood.
(for at least five minutes)
I've also seen plenty of peeing in what seems on the surface to be otherwise fairly mainstream fare, and it annoyed me.
Again, I'm generally against censorship, but am all for a warning.
surreal



Yeah, people with non-mainstream sexual fetishes should be made to feel as marginalized as a smoker at a day care just so your poor eyes don't have to be offended. I'm pretty sure the non-piss-porn-lovers of the world will get over that ONE time they accidentally clicked on the wrong video link.

Also, what the fuck does any of this have to do with Australia a) deciding that anything that comes out from between a woman's legs that isn't blood or a baby must be piss & b) that Australia bans non-mainstream-fetish porn?



Subtle sarcasm is a dangerous thing to attempt in the boards, especially when drinking. The scat story is true, though.
I'm generally appalled by this story, and the puritanical mindset that inspires these kind of legislative moves. Not nearly as appalled as I was by talk of that proposed Australian firewall a while back, which would have had far-reaching implications for far more than just female ejaculation in porn.
Every new little bit of shit like this that prudish assholes weasel in bit by bit is another step on the road to authoritarian oppression.

Elichrusos

Elichrusos

I'm lost
October 2007

JAN 23, 2010 07:53 PM

What the hell, government? Uncool!

Lemonkid

Lemonkid

Canada
May 2003

JAN 23, 2010 07:54 PM

The only squirting in Australia is blood from a toad's eye, mate.

I think as per this news Australia's "down under" status should be officially revoked. I'm calling the United Nations.

Gigondas

Gigondas

Charlotte, NC
January 2003

JAN 24, 2010 02:02 AM

This thread is pure gold.

Foxtrot_Uniform

Foxtrot_Uniform

Phoenix, AZ
January 2009

JAN 24, 2010 12:41 PM

Another case of ignorant people trying to dictate reality with there antiquated beliefs.

Darke

Darke

Columbia, MO
June 2005

JAN 24, 2010 12:45 PM

So you can find flying monkeys, talking lions and American wizards in Oz, but no squirters... some magical land that turned out to be.whatever

PaulNikon

PaulNikon

Palm Bay, FL
February 2003

JAN 24, 2010 05:07 PM

zoom image

Reagan pissing on a car.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next