Sex Talk

TOPICS:

2/9/12

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 197

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Next

Podro88

Podro88

Hartford, IL
August 2009

SEP 22, 2009 10:28 PM

We all know the main reason for the death of chivalry is that most guys are assholes. But for those who aren't why is it that girls think that we're gay or are just uninterested if we don't try to fuck them right away. I don't chase tail, it gets me nowhere except in trouble. Also, I'm far more interested in someone with a personality anyway. Anyone else have and thoughts on the matter?

IDGAS

IDGAS

Boston, MA
March 2004

SEP 22, 2009 10:44 PM

No more dragons

SirLazarusCries

SirLazarusCries

Westerville, OH
May 2008

SEP 22, 2009 10:56 PM

Because at some point in time women no longer offered kisses for you saving their life. I mean all that effort...

DannyDMc

DannyDMc

Fargo, ND
July 2003

SEP 23, 2009 12:32 AM


I still consider myself a knight of sorts, and still follow some sort of chivalry. It, as of late, hasn't hurt me with girls at all. I think the main point is that, to take this knight analogy a bit far perhapse, you need to be like Lancelot. Good old Lancelot d'Lac always acted according to CHivalry, but he wasn't afraid to cut th head off of a stray giant either! Show some guts and confidence, girls like that; if you can treat them with respect while still standing up for yourself and being 'tough' you'll do just fine.

Took me a while to realize this myself blush

Bexi

Bexi

SUICIDEGIRL

I'm lost

SEP 23, 2009 03:39 AM




But for those who aren't why is it that girls think that we're gay or are just uninterested if we don't try to fuck them right away.



Really? I don´t know what girls you´ve met but I would stay away from measuring everything by the same yardstick.

I am not a noble damsel waiting for a Lancelot to salute and make great cheer before showing me his collection of dragon-heads. Nevertheless I prefer manners over assholery. I am pretty sure a lot of women do.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

SEP 23, 2009 03:50 AM

Podro88 said:
We all know the main reason for the death of chivalry is that most guys are assholes.


You're clearly pretty useless at designing hypotheses.

"Guys are assholes" is an explanation (whether good or bad) for why chivalry does not exist. Saying that it died means that it used to exist and now it no longer does. If guys are assholes, how did chivalry exist when it did?

So what's changed? Did guys NOT use to be assholes, and they've become assholes lately, thereby killing chivalry?

Or, you know, like, what?

What's changed?

grayness

grayness

USA
January 2006

SEP 23, 2009 04:15 AM

Chivalry isn't dead, it's just not in so much in fashion.

And if you expect a reward for it...?

You're doing it for the wrong reason. It's not about what you get, it's about what you are.

ElizaTheTroll

ElizaTheTroll

Australia
January 2006

SEP 23, 2009 05:51 AM

Is this the new "nice guys finish last" thread?

Catallus

Catallus

United Kingdom
May 2009

SEP 23, 2009 05:54 AM

zoom image

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

SEP 23, 2009 06:18 AM

IDGAS said:
No more dragons



I thought I had a dragon in the house. Turns out, my roommate had burritos for dinner.

Lemonkid

Lemonkid

Canada
May 2003

SEP 23, 2009 06:37 AM

Because most men can't ride horses or use swords anymore.

RudieCantFail

RudieCantFail

Baton Rouge, LA
January 2006

SEP 23, 2009 07:10 AM

grayness said:
And if you expect a reward for it...?

You're doing it for the wrong reason. It's not about what you get, it's about what you are.



This.

Cherry2000

Cherry2000

Calgary, AB
July 2009

SEP 23, 2009 02:58 PM

RudieCantFail said:

grayness said:
And if you expect a reward for it...?

You're doing it for the wrong reason. It's not about what you get, it's about what you are.



This.



Yes. That's why I distrust "chivalrous" guys, but go for decent and kindhearted ones.

That is, guys who are respectful to everyone, not just the girls they want to nail.

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

SEP 23, 2009 03:10 PM

Lemonkid said:
Because most men can't ride horses or use swords anymore.



yea but i can ride a motorcycle while wielding a shotgun. Same difference, right?

atomicant

atomicant

Portland, OR
June 2003

SEP 23, 2009 03:12 PM

DevilsReject said:

Lemonkid said:
Because most men can't ride horses or use swords anymore.



yea but i can ride a motorcycle while wielding a shotgun. Same difference, right?



what about a hatchback and an assault rifle? i guess that's more of a 'mad max', post-apocalyptic raider though.

AceT

AceT

Portland, OR
April 2004

SEP 23, 2009 03:18 PM

Podro88 said:
chivalry


You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

zoom image

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

SEP 23, 2009 03:33 PM

Lemonkid said:
Because most men can't ride horses or use swords anymore.



Speak for yourself. My horse just hates fatties. Equine chivalry is dead.

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

SEP 23, 2009 03:38 PM

atomicant said:

DevilsReject said:

Lemonkid said:
Because most men can't ride horses or use swords anymore.



yea but i can ride a motorcycle while wielding a shotgun. Same difference, right?



what about a hatchback and an assault rifle? i guess that's more of a 'mad max', post-apocalyptic raider though.



If worst comes to worst we can just run people down with our smartcars to save the damsel in distress.

El_Bandito

El_Bandito

Hialeah, FL
April 2005

SEP 23, 2009 03:39 PM

atomicant said:

DevilsReject said:

Lemonkid said:
Because most men can't ride horses or use swords anymore.



yea but i can ride a motorcycle while wielding a shotgun. Same difference, right?



what about a hatchback and an assault rifle? i guess that's more of a 'mad max', post-apocalyptic raider though.



you cant honk at a girl with a horse either. So both of you are ahead of the curve

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

SEP 23, 2009 03:40 PM

DevilsReject said:

atomicant said:

DevilsReject said:

Lemonkid said:
Because most men can't ride horses or use swords anymore.



yea but i can ride a motorcycle while wielding a shotgun. Same difference, right?



what about a hatchback and an assault rifle? i guess that's more of a 'mad max', post-apocalyptic raider though.



If worst comes to worst we can just run people down with our smartcars to save the damsel in distress.



If a smartcar couldn't sufficiently take down atomicant, what good do you really think they'll do on the general, less pansy-assed populace?

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

SEP 23, 2009 03:46 PM

MrCrisp said:

DevilsReject said:

atomicant said:

DevilsReject said:

Lemonkid said:
Because most men can't ride horses or use swords anymore.



yea but i can ride a motorcycle while wielding a shotgun. Same difference, right?



what about a hatchback and an assault rifle? i guess that's more of a 'mad max', post-apocalyptic raider though.



If worst comes to worst we can just run people down with our smartcars to save the damsel in distress.



If a smartcar couldn't sufficiently take down atomicant, what good do you really think they'll do on the general, less pansy-assed populace?



I firmly believe in non-lethal tactics. One good smack with a smart car will hinder an attacker long enough for me to save the damsel in distress and drive off into the sunset.

Smart Cars are the new "suits of armor" and youtube agrees with me:

atomicant

atomicant

Portland, OR
June 2003

SEP 23, 2009 04:04 PM

MrCrisp said:

DevilsReject said:

atomicant said:

DevilsReject said:

Lemonkid said:
Because most men can't ride horses or use swords anymore.



yea but i can ride a motorcycle while wielding a shotgun. Same difference, right?



what about a hatchback and an assault rifle? i guess that's more of a 'mad max', post-apocalyptic raider though.



If worst comes to worst we can just run people down with our smartcars to save the damsel in distress.



If a smartcar couldn't sufficiently take down atomicant, what good do you really think they'll do on the general, less pansy-assed populace?



i find your description of me insulting. accurate, but insulting.

ass.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

SEP 23, 2009 04:06 PM

a "tritium" safety cell? hurray, you can explode somewhat more slowly but far more efficiently! this sounds very safe to me!

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

SEP 23, 2009 04:43 PM

I killed chivalry in a joust.

Kav

Kav

USA
January 2008

SEP 23, 2009 05:11 PM

Coyotemike said:
I killed chivalry in a joust.



Bastard.

But in all seriousness, I can hold my own damn door open. But it's just nice when a dude (or a chick, depending on who I'm doinking at the precise moment) does it for me.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Next