When a guy poses nude, I am sure one of the major reasons he doesn't give the full Monty is that he is self-conscious about size. I don't think it is nescessary for an SG to do the money shot in her sets, I think all the girls here are beautiful period however, I was wondering, since size isn't that much of an issue, aside from being shy or private or "mysterious", what are some other reasons that some SGs leave a little to the imagination?

SnakePlissken

Corvallis, OR

December 2002

DEC 14, 2006 09:49 AM

Tinyhobo

Boulder City, NV

December 2006

DEC 14, 2006 09:53 AM

Damn you (*shakes fist*) Snake you beat me to it again!!

Flux

SUICIDEGIRL

Georgia, USA

DEC 14, 2006 10:53 AM

I don't show my cunt to the internetting publick because I'm afraid somebody will use the term "cooter" to describe it.

StarBelliedBoy

Philadelphia, PA

December 2003

DEC 14, 2006 10:55 AM

MORE SPREDTHELEGZ KTHXBYE

Cash

USA

OLD SKOOL

DEC 14, 2006 10:58 AM

Happyboy said:
what are some other reasons that some SGs leave a little to the imagination?

Beside the stock answer that "the girls show whatever they want"...here are some potential reasons:

1. Leaving a little to the imagination scan sometimes add to the allure of the photographs. Nowadays, hardcore spread-eagle shots are only a click away on the internet. If a model chooses not to show her labia (notice I didn't say vagina)...it can be a fun psycholigical tease....

2. Since the female reproductive organ is so revered...a model may choose to show that part of her only to whom she chooses. As if to say "Consider yourself lucky...anybody with $4 a month can see my tits.....but only YOU get to see my goodies"

3. It may not be in the context of the set to show everything. Bettina, for example, has cultivated the image of a vintage pinup. Pictures from that era, commonly called "cheesecake" are meant to be playfully naughty...and not hardcore. It would be out of character for those pictures to show full frontal nudity.

4. The model may have body image issues...which is completely normal. You can't dismiss a woman's reluctance to show her pussy because size isn't an issue.

There are a ton of reasons, really.

Cash

USA

OLD SKOOL

DEC 14, 2006 10:59 AM

Flux said:
I don't show my cunt to the internetting publick because I'm afraid somebody will use the term "cooter" to describe it.

Liar, liar...cooter on fire!

SnakePlissken

Corvallis, OR

December 2002

DEC 14, 2006 11:05 AM

Flux said:
I don't show my cunt to the internetting publick because I'm afraid somebody will use the term "cooter" to describe it.

What if it was referred to as a "Yuggothian Snarling Mantrap"?

Roethke

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

DEC 14, 2006 11:13 AM

Happyboy said:
When a guy poses nude, I am sure one of the major reasons he doesn't give the full Monty is that he is self-conscious about size. I don't think it is nescessary for an SG to do the money shot in her sets, I think all the girls here are beautiful period however, I was wondering, since size isn't that much of an issue, aside from being shy or private or "mysterious", what are some other reasons that some SGs leave a little to the imagination?

I don't leae much to the imagination myself, but I can imagine why someone would want to. Having had my vulva described as "ugliest snatch ever," I've considered that perhaps it might have been a better idea just never to show it. Revealing any part of your body exposes it to criticism, and perhaps that's one thing that just shouldn't be criticized. To say "size isn't an issue for women" simplifies the matter. Just look around this board and you'll see multiple threads where ideal pussies are discussed. THere are definitely ideal shapes for pussies, and because those vary so much, it's possible for every woman to ave misgivings about the stuff between her legs.

Also, modesty.

DCruz

Montreal-nord, QC

November 2006

DEC 14, 2006 11:38 AM

well I don't know, but showing or not showing won't influence if I like a girl or not. An SG is much more than a few bits of skin, really... and for those that don't show, well I usually like the teasing aspect of how they could've showed but didn't and now I wonder what it must be like...

I dunno about there being ideal shapes, I had never heard that one before... I've heard about color but never much about shapes...

oh and Roethke, yours is perfectly fine *nods*

StarBelliedBoy

Philadelphia, PA

December 2003

DEC 14, 2006 11:41 AM

Roethke said:
Also, modesty.

I lol'd.

Lips_wawa

I'm lost

December 2006

DEC 14, 2006 11:42 AM

Modesty definitely. I did a shoot for SG and did not show my 'cooch' because I am a bit shy- not too shy to show T&A, but too shy to show V. That's just me

SmellsL1keAClown

Baton Rouge, LA

April 2006

DEC 14, 2006 11:59 AM

Roethke said:
... my vulva described as "ugliest snatch ever," ...

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

...I think not.

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

DEC 14, 2006 12:51 PM

Because they don't want to? They really don't need a more complicated reason than that.

BruisedPassion

Tucson, AZ

September 2006

DEC 14, 2006 02:41 PM

Roethke don't you believe those dumdum heads for a second. You have a very yummy looking snatch.

Martini

SUICIDEGIRL

Ontario, Canada

DEC 14, 2006 02:52 PM

Cash said:

2. Since the female reproductive organ is so revered...a model may choose to show that part of her only to whom she chooses. As if to say "Consider yourself lucky...anybody with $4 a month can see my tits.....but only YOU get to see my goodies"

3. It may not be in the context of the set to show everything. Bettina, for example, has cultivated the image of a vintage pinup. Pictures from that era, commonly called "cheesecake" are meant to be playfully naughty...and not hardcore. It would be out of character for those pictures to show full frontal nudity.

There are a ton of reasons, really.

ding ding!

xo

Salamiplus

United Kingdom

February 2004

DEC 14, 2006 03:21 PM

Check out the journal entry from Tex dated 15 November (be quick, she may be leaving us) and that will supply another very cogent reason.

certainsigns

Plano, TX

July 2006

DEC 14, 2006 03:44 PM

Roethke said:

I don't leae much to the imagination myself, but I can imagine why someone would want to. Having had my vulva described as "ugliest snatch ever," I've considered that perhaps it might have been a better idea just never to show it. Revealing any part of your body exposes it to criticism, and perhaps that's one thing that just shouldn't be criticized. To say "size isn't an issue for women" simplifies the matter. Just look around this board and you'll see multiple threads where ideal pussies are discussed. THere are definitely ideal shapes for pussies, and because those vary so much, it's possible for every woman to ave misgivings about the stuff between her legs.

To hell with whatever bleating subhuman uttered that nonsense. Your pussy is perfectly sublime.