Sex Talk

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40

 ... 197

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

TOPIC CLOSED
GoldToMe

GoldToMe

I'm lost
September 2004

JUL 31, 2006 12:02 AM

Rigel said:

AARGGGHHGHGHH said:
Rigel - if you're that delicate, is exposing your entire body on a website such a great idea? Seriously..



i'm not speaking only for me, but i'm speaking for probably a lot of people on this site in general.

and if you even bothered to look, i do not have "floppy bobblers."



...wasn't implying you did. Just talking about your apparent sensitivity.

GoldToMe

GoldToMe

I'm lost
September 2004

JUL 31, 2006 12:04 AM

MrMuller said:

Vanessa said:
I have floppy bobbler earlobes. Does that count?


Well, you got "floppy" and "bobbler", I'd say you met his criteria. Just because you went one step further doesn't mean anything. biggrin



No, she got the floppy, but not the bobbler. One out of three could never be enough.

drachenfells

drachenfells

Great Britain and Northern Ireland
July 2006

JUL 31, 2006 12:18 AM

AARGGGHHGHGHH said:

drachenfells said:
its not a matter of whither you find your terminology offensive or not. The thing that matters is that the Suicide girls...the very people that you are making a request from...they find it offensive

As for not letting another persons choice of words destroy you...its not really a matter of that.
These girls have taken it apon themself to bare all on this site. They should be treated with respect. And if they say that they find a term offensive....then its offensive to them to keep using it.

And as for it being trivial just because its the shape of theyre breasts....would you find it just as trivial if they were making comments about the shape of your cock?



Do all suicide girls share exactly the same opinion? I dont' even see that on this thread. If the status quo is never to say anything that they don't all agree with then it would be pretty hard. If they were asking for people who had a certain type of cock and saying they liked it, and that type of cock wasn't widely considered to be great, then I'd be honoured if I had that cock, sir.

I can't believe how narrow minded a lot of this thread is....it's like the ultimate in non-conformist conformists.... the PC brigade who think their idea of what causes offense is the absolute be all and end all. That utopia where everyone is ignorant unless they think like you. My ultimate nightmare.



IM sure that all the SG`s dont share the same opinion...but 8 out of the 10 that have posted on here do...and that to me is the the majority.
And i agree....that there are times that people should go against the status quo

BUT...you are talking about the very people you are making the request from. You sir are just being rude.

As for being PC...i think you will find that its nothing of the sort. There is nothing wrong with experessing a opinion...and that is what you did in your first post. Fair enough. But then it was pointed out that it might offend people.
But you are so sticking to your guns that what you said was ok that your not even considering that you may have been able to have phrased it better.

So you are saying that if someone said "i like ugly small cocks" and you had a ugly small cock...then you would be honoured to have a cock like that?

And i find it just as offensive that you think we are trying to be PC here. We are not...infact...this site is about freedom and expression. But it is not about being rude, insulting, stuborn and annoying. All things that you are sir.

We all have different opinions on what is offensive....i dont your first post was that offensive....but a good majority of the girls that have posted do....so it is you that is being the narrow minded one. You are continuing to think that you are correct...no matter what the vast majority of people on this thread may think. It is you that wants everyone to think like you....just because someone has a opposite idea to you dosent mean that they are in the wrong....that really is narrow minded.

GoldToMe

GoldToMe

I'm lost
September 2004

JUL 31, 2006 12:26 AM

I've said a couple of times that I didn't phrase it in a way that was designed to cause offence and it wasn't intended as a negative thing. I've also said that I'm happy to phrase it better.. Just waiting for suggestions that mean the same thing. However, seems more like it's easier to say "you are so wrong" than to suggest another way (that actually means the same thing!).

People are entitled to get offended, that's their choice. I'm not "correct", I just know my own motivations, and they are not about causing offence.

The fact that the majority of SGs that posted here didn't like it is no representation of them as a whole. People who feel strongly against something are more likley to voice an opinion than people are to say "yeah, that's ok I guess".

ThatWhichIsNOT

ThatWhichIsNOT

Asheville, NC
March 2006

JUL 31, 2006 12:32 AM

I have just named my penis 'floppy bobbler.'
It was previously named either 'Bob Dobbs' or 'Willis,' depending on mood. Mostly 'Willis.'

Also, not to be too rude, but fuck PC. This is what freedom of speech is about (though I know it doesn't exist in this private club, in certain ways). Sometimes language hurts, even when you're trying to say something nice. Haven't you ever had a compliment get taken the wrong way? We are all different. We have our own ways of seeing things, feeling things, and saying things. You may think something somebody says is rude, but it is even more rude to simply silence them out of hand.

If you want people to let you get by, then for the love of Bob calm down and let other people get by too.

drachenfells

drachenfells

Great Britain and Northern Ireland
July 2006

JUL 31, 2006 12:34 AM

ahhh...so what your saying is that your going to stick to your view untill we get all the SG`s on the site to cast a vote and say wither they find it offensive or not?

Personally...if one SG finds it offensive....one is enough.

I never called you evil....and i dont think you are.....i just think its insensative of you to say what you have.

And no-one has suggested a way to phrase it better...because what your asking....phrased another way....is still going to be offensive to these people. What would be better perhaps is to show a picture of the type of girl you are looking for....and aslking if anyone can suggest similar girls on this site.....that way you are making no written term to describe it...therefore not insulting/offending/upsetting anyone.

Im sure your motivations was not to offend people...and im sure you made a genuine request.....but you DID offend....whither you wanted to or not....

ThatWhichIsNOT

ThatWhichIsNOT

Asheville, NC
March 2006

JUL 31, 2006 12:35 AM

AARGGGHHGHGHH said:
People who feel strongly against something are more likley to voice an opinion than people are to say "yeah, that's ok I guess".



Ain't it the truth! That is the whole reason people actualy mistake the religious right wing as having a majority.

drachenfells

drachenfells

Great Britain and Northern Ireland
July 2006

JUL 31, 2006 12:38 AM

TheGrandVomica25 said:
I have just named my penis 'floppy bobbler.'
It was previously named either 'Bob Dobbs' or 'Willis,' depending on mood. Mostly 'Willis.'

Also, not to be too rude, but fuck PC. This is what freedom of speech is about (though I know it doesn't exist in this private club, in certain ways). Sometimes language hurts, even when you're trying to say something nice. Haven't you ever had a compliment get taken the wrong way? We are all different. We have our own ways of seeing things, feeling things, and saying things. You may think something somebody says is rude, but it is even more rude to simply silence them out of hand.

If you want people to let you get by, then for the love of Bob calm down and let other people get by too.



Im all for people having freedom of speech.
and yes i have had compliements been taken the wrong way.
But in this case....not only has it been taken the wrong way....but he has then said that...no....your wrong for taking it the wrong way....i wasent being offensive and you are wrong for thinking i was.

GoldToMe

GoldToMe

I'm lost
September 2004

JUL 31, 2006 12:44 AM

ok, ok, referring to breasts in any way that relates to them not being totally 100% perky is WRONG WRONG WRONG. It should not be mentioned. It is unmentionable. Breasts like this do not exist. They should be denied. If a lady doesn't have perky breasts no mention of their relative perkiness should be made. If a lady does not have perky breasts, she should not be subjected to any comment that implies that they are not 100% perky in case she takes offence. No positive comment should ever be made about the virtues of breasts that are not perky as merely recognising that they are not perky can reduce one girl somewhere to a gibbering wreck. She should be in denial. Her breasts are not perky - they are unmentionable - DO NOT MENTION THEM IN RELATION TO PERKINESS.

I HAVE LEARNT. I would like to take this time to thank everyone here for the education they have given to me. I can now go out into the world as a better person smile

.....Alternatively does anyone have a universally inoffensive way of describing floppy bobblers?

mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

JUL 31, 2006 12:46 AM

My bobbler's gone floppy and I have no Viagra... frown

Quirky

Quirky

Birmingham, AL
October 2005

JUL 31, 2006 12:46 AM

AARGGGHHGHGHH said:
ok, ok, referring to breasts in any way that relates to them not being totally 100% perky is WRONG WRONG WRONG. It should not be mentioned. It is unmentionable. Breasts like this do not exist. They should be denied. If a lady doesn't have perky breasts no mention of their relative perkiness should be made. If a lady does not have perky breasts, she should not be subjected to any comment that implies that they are not 100% perky in case she takes offence. No positive comment should ever be made about the virtues of breasts that are not perky as merely recognising that they are not perky can reduce one girl somewhere to a gibbering wreck. She should be in denial. Her breasts are not perky - they are unmentionable - DO NOT MENTION THEM IN RELATION TO PERKINESS.

I HAVE LEARNT. I would like to take this time to thank everyone here for the education they have given to me. I can now go out into the world as a better person smile

.....Alternatively does anyone have a universally inoffensive way of describing floppy bobblers?



the thai use Nom to describe all breasts.

GoldToMe

GoldToMe

I'm lost
September 2004

JUL 31, 2006 12:47 AM

TheGrandVomica25 said:
I have just named my penis 'floppy bobbler.'
It was previously named either 'Bob Dobbs' or 'Willis,' depending on mood. Mostly 'Willis.'

Also, not to be too rude, but fuck PC. This is what freedom of speech is about (though I know it doesn't exist in this private club, in certain ways). Sometimes language hurts, even when you're trying to say something nice. Haven't you ever had a compliment get taken the wrong way? We are all different. We have our own ways of seeing things, feeling things, and saying things. You may think something somebody says is rude, but it is even more rude to simply silence them out of hand.

If you want people to let you get by, then for the love of Bob calm down and let other people get by too.




Excellent, sir.

drachenfells

drachenfells

Great Britain and Northern Ireland
July 2006

JUL 31, 2006 12:53 AM

AARGGGHHGHGHH said:
ok, ok, referring to breasts in any way that relates to them not being totally 100% perky is WRONG WRONG WRONG. It should not be mentioned. It is unmentionable. Breasts like this do not exist. They should be denied. If a lady doesn't have perky breasts no mention of their relative perkiness should be made. If a lady does not have perky breasts, she should not be subjected to any comment that implies that they are not 100% perky in case she takes offence. No positive comment should ever be made about the virtues of breasts that are not perky as merely recognising that they are not perky can reduce one girl somewhere to a gibbering wreck. She should be in denial. Her breasts are not perky - they are unmentionable - DO NOT MENTION THEM IN RELATION TO PERKINESS.

I HAVE LEARNT. I would like to take this time to thank everyone here for the education they have given to me. I can now go out into the world as a better person smile

.....Alternatively does anyone have a universally inoffensive way of describing floppy bobblers?



you are once again taking this completly the wrong way.

look...its not about them being non-perky....its about them being floppy.

its like someone saying...."have we got any pictures of guys with really small cocks?" instead of saying "have we got any pictures of guys that have less than average sized cocks"

there are lots of breast sizes and shapes that arnt perky....and that can be said....but you got to understand...floppy is hardly the way to make a complement about people


But enough...there is no way that either of us is going to make the other person see what they are saying.

I wish you good luck on this site in the future....and hope that any othere threads you start turn out better for you than this, and that i apologise if you think i was picking on you or calling you evil....i was just expressing the views that i strongly felt.

GoldToMe

GoldToMe

I'm lost
September 2004

JUL 31, 2006 01:58 AM

Ok - I will use the term "non-perky". Is that ok? I thought earlier you said that even if I re-phrased it it would still be offensive, so I shouldn't? See your previous post. I don't really see what you're saying as it doesn't seem to be consistent now.

drachenfells

drachenfells

Great Britain and Northern Ireland
July 2006

JUL 31, 2006 02:03 AM

AARGGGHHGHGHH said:
Ok - I will use the term "non-perky". Is that ok? I thought earlier you said that even if I re-phrased it it would still be offensive, so I shouldn't? See your previous post



what i said was...if your still going to repharse it in a way that says floppy...but with another word...its still going to be offensive....if you say ....not non-perky ...then thats different.

Non-perky is fine...it covers a lot of things....

DhD_No_Pants

DhD_No_Pants

Katy, TX
May 2006

JUL 31, 2006 12:52 PM

I do not have floppy bobblers, but I do have a Jiggly Butt.

MessyJessy

MessyJessy

Fort Myers, FL
August 2005

JUL 31, 2006 01:04 PM

bahahahahaha

wendoo

wendoo

United Kingdom
February 2006

JUL 31, 2006 01:44 PM

I just wonder how you remember how many Gs and Hs go in the name if cookies get deleted.
I have a feeling I might class as a sporter of itty bitty floppy bobblers, yet the name is more hilarious than offensive to me!

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

JUL 31, 2006 01:51 PM

I wonder what the response to an SG declaring her love for "Floppy Bobblers" would be...

Personally, I thought it was sort of funny...certainly not offensive.

Posh

Posh

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

JUL 31, 2006 01:58 PM

PointBlank said:
I wonder what the response to an SG declaring her love for "Floppy Bobblers" would be...

Personally, I thought it was sort of funny...certainly not offensive.



i don't know, i'd be offended if someone pointed out i had saggy tits. i personally don't want tits that hang over and reach my belly button. personal taste. no offense to those that love 'em.

Rigel

Rigel

ASSPARTY

California, USA

JUL 31, 2006 02:26 PM

Posh said:
i don't know, i'd be offended if someone pointed out i had saggy tits.



i said that earlier and it was noted that maybe i shouldn't be a nude model if i was that sensitive.

missing the point, man.....

niccie

niccie

United Kingdom
March 2006

JUL 31, 2006 02:49 PM

AARGGGHHGHGHH said:
....Alternatively does anyone have a universally inoffensive way of describing floppy bobblers?



Spaniels ears? Thats kinda cute.

clara

clara

MODERATOR

Baltimore, MD

JUL 31, 2006 02:58 PM

Why can no one follow directions?

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next