John Lennon murder film-very interesting

I considered the source and disregarded.

Once again, you are wiser than I.

My wife is still in the honeymoon phase.

Years from now, she'll probably think this is classifiable as "lazy"

I am dying to know how this



will physically portray this



(however prison life has slimmed him down incredibly.)

[Edited on Nov 08, 2005 by 4Stella4Star]

i think a lot of people are still just PO'ed at Paul for taking up with the young modelly chick so soon after Linda died. i know that's my best friend's major issue with him (and she's been a die hard Beatles fan since we could talk, i know far more about the Beatles than i could ever hope to learn otherwise just from being around her for nearly two decades).

i hadn't heard about the movie, though. i'm intrigued.

I'm still, after all these years, mystefied as to why Mark Chapman would shoot John instead of Yoko. His motive doesn't add up; I mean . . . he could have shot Yoko.

He could have at least shot her too.

This takes me right back to Santa Cruz, circa 1997.

I'm no conspiracy theorist -- although I do like to read them for a laugh now and then.

That said, and Stephen King nonsense aside, Who Killed John Lennon? was the most convincing conspiracy theory I've ever read...

Not too sure about the 'Loving father and husband' bit...

.


Not too sure about the 'Loving father and husband' bit...



Why?

With Sean and Yoko, he was a whole lot better than with Cynthia and Julian. I'm sure he'd have said as much himself.

Apparently he didn't leave Julian a dime. Everything for Sean. I don't recall the scandal.

But Julian got "Hey Jude"......can't put a price on that, eh?

John was out of his mind when he had Julian. And he regretted fucking up his relationship with him quite openly and quite often. He tried to make up for it by doing everything for Sean.

In the end, who cares what the balance of love given was? He's a person, and people try.

Now what I think he should really be on trial for here is not cutting Yoko's head off with a tire iron and blaming it on a home intruder.

good one.
what are you guys writing his eulogy here?

i mean, seriously...

this is the guy youve got a hard on for?



TFOK you seem to have pretty good taste in music, you have to admit that post beatles lennon is lame, musically and personally.


shajh: ]same bullshit different face

[Edited on Nov 09, 2005 by DrStinkypants]

Actually, no. I don't know who those two are, but they aren't John & Yoko.

Please, keep living up to all of my expectations.

what are those exactly?

My point exactly.

ditto.

The whole ten years John managed to stay alive after the beatles produced probably an album's worth of good songs. But who cares? I guess he had fun discovering new things, and his songs in the Beatles were fine, so who cares, really.

What boggles my mind is that in order to listen to some of it, you have to skip Yoko's tracks. That's something which truly is a post-Beatles turn-off.

Oh man I just noticed (since I disreguard that guy's posts here) this totally isn't them. Bah!

I'm a big fan of John and Paul.

Have you heard Paul's latest album? I think it's great. I keep listening to it. Possibly the best album of his solo career.

Probably due to how things went in the end with Cynthia and him... tried to pull up a globe and mail article... but it's friggin locked up now. Grah.

Link is there if anyone has a proper login. Goes on how Cynthia found out about what was going on... ie, walking into her home, and finding John and Yoko all snuggly on the floor.

/shrugs/ always two sides to every story... but still I'm not all for John, or Paul.

edit: stupid quote tags.

[Edited on Nov 14, 2005 by zenFish]