Music

TOPICS:

9/13/05

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

169 | 170 | 171

 ... 470

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Next

Ryan_Dipietro

Ryan_Dipietro

Naples, FL
April 2004

DEC 14, 2004 10:47 AM

At least that's what they're saying in the ads for their new album. whatever Personally, i think they make shitty music so maybe im biased, but "Godfathers of Punk Rock"? I don't think so.

RubberSoul

RubberSoul

Los Angeles, CA
February 2003

DEC 14, 2004 10:51 AM

Thank you, Mr. Christgau.

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

DEC 14, 2004 10:52 AM

souljacker said:
Thank you, Mr. Christgau.


B+

mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

DEC 14, 2004 10:53 AM

They are the Godfathers of MTV Punk... surreal

StarBelliedBoy

StarBelliedBoy

Philadelphia, PA
December 2003

DEC 14, 2004 10:53 AM

hahahaha, NO!

MrZablowdowski

MrZablowdowski

Edmonton, AB
December 2002

DEC 14, 2004 10:58 AM

*gag*

Motionboy

Motionboy

Vancouver, BC
January 2004

DEC 14, 2004 10:59 AM

green day rocks.

navin

navin

Seattle, WA
September 2002

DEC 14, 2004 11:00 AM

souljacker said:
Thank you, Mr. Christgau.


ha ha ha

navin

navin

Seattle, WA
September 2002

DEC 14, 2004 11:01 AM

they're no silverchair

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:01 AM

Aquaman said:
green day rocks.




agreed. I haven't seen that ad, and I REALLY doubt that they would put themselves out as the "Godfathers" of anything. Unless they were being ironical. In which case, I'd totally buy it.

Regardless, Green Day does, in fact, rock.

hermetica

hermetica

Cook Islands
January 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:02 AM

Oh.. god... help.. my sides hurt... I cant stop laughing...somebody give them a whack upside the head with the edge of a Ramones album.. please.... even New York Dolls vinyl will do... god..
biggrin biggrin biggrin puke

punk

punk

Phoenix, AZ
January 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:04 AM

I would have to disagree. I like Green Day, but Godfather’s of punk rock they are not.

Motionboy

Motionboy

Vancouver, BC
January 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:06 AM

seeing that the Billie Joe kept saying "this song goes to Jonny ramone" in the concert and they paid their tributes in the best way possible I DOUBT that they'll market themselves as grandfathers of rock.

Of course listening to greenday is too uncool for some of you guys so why argue whatever


*plays holiday

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:09 AM

Still, if the social content of punk rock is, in part, a big fucking NO to the shimmery tungsten cage of boredom that appears around us viz corporate transmutation of every border of daily life into some kind of slick product we are free to buy or not to buy, that is the (only) question, then Green Day can't really qualify, now can they? 'Cause try as I may, I just can't find that NO anywhere in what they do, in any serious way. Them things they say are now just part of the stylistic performance of the genre, and tough they seem not to be the astounding creeps one might find in Good Charlotte, they nonetheless share with that band an incapacity to engage at once the two elements that must be present and in drama with each other in a vital genre. Green Day, I am saying: not punk rock, just formalists.

But they're kind of good. I am not saying Green Day sucks. I like them. I like that song "Warning" a lot. Historically apt punk formalism can be a blast, and historically apt disco formalist is good for dancing, and so on. This is not about what band does and doesn't suck. Nor is about calling out poseurs. (By the way, in the case of music, "poseur" is a contraction of "all sonic formalism, no social content.")

It's about genre.

--Sasha Frere Jones here.

Ghostdad

Ghostdad

Pacifica, CA
January 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:10 AM

. . . and all this time I've been referring to them as "the retarded younger brother of Punk." I guess I owe them an apology.

[Edited on Dec 14, 2004 by DiamondGeezer]

phineas

phineas

Bozeman, MT
August 2003

DEC 14, 2004 11:15 AM

yeah...Lou Reed's got nothing on Green Day...

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:25 AM

Point_Blank said:
Still, if the social content of punk rock is, in part, a big fucking NO to the shimmery tungsten cage of boredom that appears around us viz corporate transmutation of every border of daily life into some kind of slick product we are free to buy or not to buy, that is the (only) question, then Green Day can't really qualify, now can they? 'Cause try as I may, I just can't find that NO anywhere in what they do, in any serious way. Them things they say are now just part of the stylistic performance of the genre, and tough they seem not to be the astounding creeps one might find in Good Charlotte, they nonetheless share with that band an incapacity to engage at once the two elements that must be present and in drama with each other in a vital genre. Green Day, I am saying: not punk rock, just formalists.

But they're kind of good. I am not saying Green Day sucks. I like them. I like that song "Warning" a lot. Historically apt punk formalism can be a blast, and historically apt disco formalist is good for dancing, and so on. This is not about what band does and doesn't suck. Nor is about calling out poseurs. (By the way, in the case of music, "poseur" is a contraction of "all sonic formalism, no social content.")

It's about genre.

--Sasha Frere Jones here.



I think you think to much wink

I also think you're wrong. Punk Rock is more complicated than just saying "no" to corporate culture. Punk Rock is about saying no when people expect you to say yes. It's about being individuals and celebrating the basic things that matter as we live for the future. It's about challenging pre-concieved notions of what is "normal" and "OK". Which is why I shake my head every time people say "Green Day (or "insert band here") sold out! They're not Punk". Because the mere act of saying that is probably the most un-Punk Rock thing you can say.

I know, you're not bagging them for being who they are. And we can disagree as to whether they're punk or not. I'd argue they are, absolutely. But maybe that's because to me, they'll always be the band onstage at Gilman when I was a 13 year old kid who still liked Van Halen. To ME (and for a lot of people my age and younger), they were what opened me up to Punk. And that HAS to count for something, regardless of all of the shitty Good Charlottes and New Found Glorys that they spawned.

dingoes8

dingoes8

Milwaukee, WI
March 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:28 AM

Godfather is a lame term. That means they'll inherit all of Punk Rock once the Ramones all die?

Ghostdad

Ghostdad

Pacifica, CA
January 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:31 AM

dingoes8 said:
Godfather is a lame term. That means they'll inherit all of Punk Rock once the Ramones all die?



Not really. It just means that Green Day sponsored Punk at it's baptism.

Ryan_Dipietro

Ryan_Dipietro

Naples, FL
April 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:31 AM

Who knows. I didn't script the ad, thats what it sounded like to me.

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Canada
November 2002

DEC 14, 2004 11:32 AM

dingoes8 said:
Godfather is a lame term. That means they'll inherit all of Punk Rock once the Ramones all die?



It just means I can ask Billie Joe a favor on the day of his daughter's wedding and he can't refuse.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:34 AM

dingoes8 said:
Godfather is a lame term. That means they'll inherit all of Punk Rock once the Ramones all die?



Yes, in fact. It's quite a big deal. Mike Dirnt and Tre Cool are in fact rubbing their hands together at this very moment, sinisterly trying to decide out how Tommy can be "disappeared" without anyone finding out. I've heard that Tim Armstrong has been hired to work up a timebomb...

(Get it? Get it? I slay me.)

RubberSoul

RubberSoul

Los Angeles, CA
February 2003

DEC 14, 2004 11:34 AM

Point_Blank said:
Still, if the social content of punk rock is, in part, a big fucking NO to the shimmery tungsten cage of boredom that appears around us viz corporate transmutation of every border of daily life into some kind of slick product we are free to buy or not to buy, that is the (only) question, then Green Day can't really qualify, now can they? 'Cause try as I may, I just can't find that NO anywhere in what they do, in any serious way. Them things they say are now just part of the stylistic performance of the genre, and tough they seem not to be the astounding creeps one might find in Good Charlotte, they nonetheless share with that band an incapacity to engage at once the two elements that must be present and in drama with each other in a vital genre. Green Day, I am saying: not punk rock, just formalists.

But they're kind of good. I am not saying Green Day sucks. I like them. I like that song "Warning" a lot. Historically apt punk formalism can be a blast, and historically apt disco formalist is good for dancing, and so on. This is not about what band does and doesn't suck. Nor is about calling out poseurs. (By the way, in the case of music, "poseur" is a contraction of "all sonic formalism, no social content.")

It's about genre.

--Sasha Frere Jones here.



Dude, you sound really smart. Do you write term papers for a living?

Lain

Lain

Astoria, NY
April 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:34 AM

The slaughtering of a million babies can be heard over the foothills of japan.

This is a sad day.


Fuck you Green Day. But in hell!

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

DEC 14, 2004 11:35 AM

souljacker said:

Point_Blank said:
Still, if the social content of punk rock is, in part, a big fucking NO to the shimmery tungsten cage of boredom that appears around us viz corporate transmutation of every border of daily life into some kind of slick product we are free to buy or not to buy, that is the (only) question, then Green Day can't really qualify, now can they? 'Cause try as I may, I just can't find that NO anywhere in what they do, in any serious way. Them things they say are now just part of the stylistic performance of the genre, and tough they seem not to be the astounding creeps one might find in Good Charlotte, they nonetheless share with that band an incapacity to engage at once the two elements that must be present and in drama with each other in a vital genre. Green Day, I am saying: not punk rock, just formalists.

But they're kind of good. I am not saying Green Day sucks. I like them. I like that song "Warning" a lot. Historically apt punk formalism can be a blast, and historically apt disco formalist is good for dancing, and so on. This is not about what band does and doesn't suck. Nor is about calling out poseurs. (By the way, in the case of music, "poseur" is a contraction of "all sonic formalism, no social content.")

It's about genre.

--Sasha Frere Jones here.



Dude, you sound really smart. Do you write term papers for a living?


Unfortunately, I sound very stupid. The quote above is from Sasha Frere-Jones.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Next