IPOD
RADIO
TOPICS:
SEP 13, 2008 03:50 PM
As geeky as Latin rock can get (we can't help we are just too cool): Amigos Invisibles
Brought to you by Ritmo. 
SEP 18, 2008 10:34 AM
bean said:
I love how according to this thread, there's absolutely no consistent style or even anything that defines the genre other than "music made by, for, or about geeks." I mean, hell, most of it isn't even rock.
What exactly are you getting at sir? 
SEP 18, 2008 10:51 AM
mydogfarted said:
bean said:
I love how according to this thread, there's absolutely no consistent style or even anything that defines the genre other than "music made by, for, or about geeks." I mean, hell, most of it isn't even rock.
What exactly are you getting at sir?
That it's not actually a genre? That if it is a genre it's a phenomenally poorly defined genre? That if it's not actually phenomenally poorly defined, then people don't actually understand how it's defined?
I don't know, one of those things is true. I don't know which one it is.
SEP 18, 2008 10:57 AM
bean said:
mydogfarted said:
bean said:
I love how according to this thread, there's absolutely no consistent style or even anything that defines the genre other than "music made by, for, or about geeks." I mean, hell, most of it isn't even rock.
What exactly are you getting at sir?
That it's not actually a genre? That if it is a genre it's a phenomenally poorly defined genre? That if it's not actually phenomenally poorly defined, then people don't actually understand how it's defined?
I don't know, one of those things is true. I don't know which one it is.
Does it bother you that much?
SEP 18, 2008 11:16 AM
bean said:
mydogfarted said:
bean said:
I love how according to this thread, there's absolutely no consistent style or even anything that defines the genre other than "music made by, for, or about geeks." I mean, hell, most of it isn't even rock.
What exactly are you getting at sir?
That it's not actually a genre? That if it is a genre it's a phenomenally poorly defined genre? That if it's not actually phenomenally poorly defined, then people don't actually understand how it's defined?
I don't know, one of those things is true. I don't know which one it is.
I'm going with ALL of the above.
SEP 18, 2008 11:58 AM
Cassiel said:
bean said:
mydogfarted said:
bean said:
I love how according to this thread, there's absolutely no consistent style or even anything that defines the genre other than "music made by, for, or about geeks." I mean, hell, most of it isn't even rock.
What exactly are you getting at sir?
That it's not actually a genre? That if it is a genre it's a phenomenally poorly defined genre? That if it's not actually phenomenally poorly defined, then people don't actually understand how it's defined?
I don't know, one of those things is true. I don't know which one it is.
Does it bother you that much?
Doesn't bother me at all, just making an observation.
loading your activity feed...
LeftyAmerican
Fort Bragg, NC
April 2007
SEP 11, 2008 09:56 PM