There are people I know with a lot more than the above - which might seem a silly amount to some people but it works for me. I'm all for quality over quantity, but I'm just a sucker for too many genres and sub-genres and sub-sub-genres and so on.
More an intensely personal biography in music than a collection though..
terekhova said:
I'm all for quality over quantity, .
No you're not.
Seriously, how many of those songs do you think that guy's never listened to more than once? Or even at all?
At least half. Another person who backs up the premise that no one who steals shitloads of music has good (or any) taste. Gluttonous accumulation for its own sake. Which is sort of surprising considering that he's in a pretty good band.
terekhova said:
I'm all for quality over quantity, .
No you're not.
Seriously, how many of those songs do you think that guy's never listened to more than once? Or even at all?
At least half. Another person who backs up the premise that no one who steals shitloads of music has good (or any) taste. Gluttonous accumulation for its own sake. Which is sort of surprising considering that he's in a pretty good band.
I opened a bag of worms here. The above is the result of a long term unhealthy obsession with music. Gluttonous is perhaps appropriate. Indefensable as well, as it's extreme (though not, as I mentioned, nearly as extreme as some) and not 'right thinking' in many ways. There's no way I could listen to more than a fraction over the space of each year, but it's more analogous to revisiting memories - it's important that they're there even if you don't go back to them very often.
Just on a side note - very little, percentage-wise at least, is unpaid for one way or another. That's actually sadder in many ways (think what else I could have done!) than if I was playing it more fast and loose with such things...
terekhova
United Kingdom
August 2004
JUL 24, 2007 12:48 PM