Over the past 15 years Richard Linklater has turned into one of the great American film auteurs. His last few years have been his most exciting artistically and financially. School of Rock was his biggest hit and he followed that up with Before Sunset for which he was nominated for an Academy Award. Now comes his adaptation of Philip K. Dicks novel A Scanner Darkly which utilizes the computer rotoscoping he first experimented with in Waking Life. A Scanner Darkly stars Keanu Reeves as Bob Arctor,...
Limited debut in theatres and the movie only grossed barely over $400k. What the shit is that? Philip K Dick is a phenominal sci-fi author and the rotoscoping tech although almost a 100yrs old was done cell by cell for this flick. I have the anger! Why wasn't this given a bigger release base?!
-=Jeff=-
neutronjockey said:
Limited debut in theatres and the movie only grossed barely over $400k. What the shit is that? Philip K Dick is a phenominal sci-fi author and the rotoscoping tech although almost a 100yrs old was done cell by cell for this flick. I have the anger! Why wasn't this given a bigger release base?!
-=Jeff=-
its actually computer rotoscop[ing so its a bit different.
neutronjockey said:
Limited debut in theatres and the movie only grossed barely over $400k. What the shit is that? Philip K Dick is a phenominal sci-fi author and the rotoscoping tech although almost a 100yrs old was done cell by cell for this flick. I have the anger! Why wasn't this given a bigger release base?!
-=Jeff=-
my thoughts exactly. im sure linklater , in terms of profilt, thought he could make up for it in School of Rock 2 or something. But still, i saw it cuz im in austin. What about my fiends in El Paso or ElmerDinkleyVille ? this is a kickass movie, and im a picky sumbitch.
neutronjockey said:
Limited debut in theatres and the movie only grossed barely over $400k. What the shit is that? Philip K Dick is a phenominal sci-fi author and the rotoscoping tech although almost a 100yrs old was done cell by cell for this flick. I have the anger! Why wasn't this given a bigger release base?!
-=Jeff=-
Because Philip K Dick isn't a massively popular author, the subject matter is thick, and Linklater isn't really a "big-time" director? There's no point in striking more prints of a movie that you can't guarantee will pull in the production cost on its own when your opposition on the day is Pirates of The Caribbean 2.
As it is, the money it pulled in was enough for Warner Bros. to go "let's put it in more theaters". It's going to expand a little bit more over the next couple of weeks.
saw it last week and enjoyed it quite a bit. thought it did justice to PKD's style in a manner that none of the other adaptations have. definitely recommended.
I saw A Scanner Darkly last week and I liked it. I felt dissapointed in one of the last scenes because of it being a lil too "state the facts for the people that didn't figure it out", but other than that quite good.
I saw Superman returns over the weekend and I wanted to kil lthe family next to me with the boy who loudly would ask every 5 mins "what's going on?" I almost told the mother I got this one.
Because Philip K Dick isn't a massively popular author, the subject matter is thick, and Linklater isn't really a "big-time" director?
I'll give you two out of three there... there have been some huge films based on PKD books. (And some clunkers.)
William_Miller said:
There's no point in striking more prints of a movie that you can't guarantee will pull in the production cost on its own when your opposition on the day is Pirates of The Caribbean 2.
That's for sure. Did people really expect POTC to do so well, though? I didn't.
William_Miller said:
As it is, the money it pulled in was enough for Warner Bros. to go "let's put it in more theaters". It's going to expand a little bit more over the next couple of weeks.
Here's hoping. I think Linklater is right on in the bit in the interview where he says people think of animation/rotoscoping now in the same way that PKD's books were thought of back in the day. Pixar-style animation is realistic enough that it's an easy jump to make from traditional film, but there is all kinds of potential for trippier things like this.
I can hardly wait to see this film, being both a great fan of Phillip K. Dick and the rotoscoping used in A Waking Life. This should be a benchmark for animation, considering the current market. I recently saw Nacho Libre, which was worked on by the Hess brothers and Mike White, who is by far the most underrated writer in film today, and while I know Nacho Libre was sort of a kids' movie, all thirty-seven previews that were shown between Coca-Cola commercials before the film started were for CGI movie with talking animals, or some shit. There has to be a breakthrough soon in commercial film animation, I don't see why rotoscoping can't turn the tide.
courtneyriot
STAFF
Los Angeles, CA
JUL 10, 2006 06:00 AM