TOPICS:
MAY 18, 2006 11:15 AM
MAY 18, 2006 11:17 AM
MAY 18, 2006 11:19 AM
MAY 18, 2006 11:21 AM
MAY 18, 2006 11:22 AM
MAY 18, 2006 11:29 AM
PaulNikon said:
You know what I find perverse? Two jumbo jets full of people being flown into the World Trade Center.
Well Obviously you don't understand...whats worse is that there were MEN on that plane, not just womne *GASP*.
Another thing....when the Hell did we start letting "Them" Drive? 
MAY 18, 2006 11:44 AM
MAY 18, 2006 11:58 AM
The king told editors on Monday night that publishing a woman's picture was inappropriate.
"One must think, 'do they want their daughter, their sister, or their wife to appear in this way?' Of course, no one would accept this," the newspaper Okaz quoted Abdullah as saying.
Yes, He's totally right. It's not like:
"One must think, 'do they want their daughter, their sister, or their wife to be one of the king's harem cattle?' Of course, everybody would accept this," 
[Edited on May 18, 2006 11:59AM]
MAY 18, 2006 12:02 PM
MAY 18, 2006 12:02 PM
MAY 18, 2006 12:09 PM
Kinto said:
The king told editors on Monday night that publishing a woman's picture was inappropriate.
"One must think, 'do they want their daughter, their sister, or their wife to appear in this way?' Of course, no one would accept this," the newspaper Okaz quoted Abdullah as saying.
Yes, He's totally right. It's not like:
"One must think, 'do they want their daughter, their sister, or their wife to be one of the king's harem cattle?' Of course, everybody would accept this,"
[Edited on May 18, 2006 11:59AM]
You know, you'd think these guys wouldn't fear being corrupted by something they consider an object to buy and sell.
MAY 18, 2006 12:24 PM
roaring_tulips said:
Kinto said:
The king told editors on Monday night that publishing a woman's picture was inappropriate.
"One must think, 'do they want their daughter, their sister, or their wife to appear in this way?' Of course, no one would accept this," the newspaper Okaz quoted Abdullah as saying.
Yes, He's totally right. It's not like:
"One must think, 'do they want their daughter, their sister, or their wife to be one of the king's harem cattle?' Of course, everybody would accept this,"
[Edited on May 18, 2006 11:59AM]
You know, you'd think these guys wouldn't fear being corrupted by something they consider an object to buy and sell.
I suppose if money can corrupt men, so can the commodity called woman.
I'll trade you twenty wives for a camel!
(Might get some work out of the camel.)
MAY 18, 2006 01:03 PM
MAY 18, 2006 01:32 PM
MAY 18, 2006 01:34 PM
hey_fukko said:
roaring_tulips said:
Kinto said:
The king told editors on Monday night that publishing a woman's picture was inappropriate.
"One must think, 'do they want their daughter, their sister, or their wife to appear in this way?' Of course, no one would accept this," the newspaper Okaz quoted Abdullah as saying.
Yes, He's totally right. It's not like:
"One must think, 'do they want their daughter, their sister, or their wife to be one of the king's harem cattle?' Of course, everybody would accept this,"
[Edited on May 18, 2006 11:59AM]
You know, you'd think these guys wouldn't fear being corrupted by something they consider an object to buy and sell.
I suppose if money can corrupt men, so can the commodity called woman.
I'll trade you twenty wives for a camel!
(Might get some work out of the camel.)
Hey, if money had Vaginas on it I'd want to be rich.
MAY 18, 2006 02:46 PM
MAY 18, 2006 02:51 PM
MAY 18, 2006 02:52 PM
MAY 18, 2006 03:20 PM
MAY 18, 2006 03:31 PM
personally I think those saudi boys are a buncha sailors if you know what I mean. 
MAY 18, 2006 03:48 PM
MAY 18, 2006 07:17 PM
Ommetaphobia said:
This reminds me of this commercial I saw on TLC the other day. It was called "God or the Girl". I don't know exactly what the premise is, but from the ad it seemed to be about 3 or 4 guys who had received a calling to become priests but whose sole obstacle into priesthood was their reticence at getting rid of their attraction to women. What is it with religion trying to conflict enlightenment with one's desire for women? Their logic seems to indicate that we're basically tools of Satan created to lead men astray or something. This sort of thinking leads tons of victims of rape to be accused of bringing it on themselves.
No, that's entirely what it is. It's the mind/body dichotomy--enlightenment only comes when we rid ourselves of "the pleasures of the flesh" and all that crap, when we rise above the demands of our weak-willed, deviant, impure bodies and reach some nonexistent plateau at which we're all just floating disembodied brains, pure intellect--and woman has always been placed squarely on the "body" side of that divide. And if woman is body, then she's another material, physical weakness that can lead our (or, well, "their," I guess) minds/souls/etc. astray and thus must be jettisoned in order to transcend.
And, you know, it's totally true. I mean, I go trolling for pure male souls to lead astray all the time--don't you? 
Rahodeb
Los Angeles, CA
March 2006
MAY 18, 2006 10:58 AM