Lifestyle

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

224 | 225 | 226

 ... 954

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Kristie

Kristie

Chicago, IL
December 2004

APR 15, 2006 01:09 PM

Dove said:
i'm sure he's been flagged about a hojillion times by now. maybe god IS on his side! eeek



Seriously... What's the deal? He's the very first person I've ever flagged on ths site, and I've been here for about 16 months!

stella_marie

stella_marie

New York, NY
January 2005

APR 15, 2006 02:35 PM

Tsui said:

J24U said:
He's so desperate to appear superior to anyone at this point, no matter how pathetic the methods. To each his own I guess, it speaks of a terribly lonely life if you ask me.




He's so intelligent he comments back in his own journal.
Maybe when he figures out how to reply to comments in other members' journal's, we can then decide just how mentally superior he is.



how funny is that!! of like his 9 comments, 5 are his

Christopher

Christopher

Portland, OR
November 2002

APR 15, 2006 04:48 PM

Survivor8403 said:


So, relating this back to your previous post about learning from the Christians about expelling/destroying/murdering/kicking out Jews—you wish you would have learned from Christian filth before expelling them?



Whoever said anything about expelling Christian "filth" ? I was talking about the heap of rubbish that had to be cleaned from the site of the temple by the Muslim Army before the temple site was handed back to the Jews in the presence of Sophronius the Christian patriarch---who in line with the Christian church certainly did not approve of Jewish presence in Jerusalem and who had strongly resisted Caliph Omar Bin Khattab's idea that Jews should be allowed back into Jerusalem .
As long as the Omariyya Covenant was observed none faced banishment or expulsion--Jews, Christians or Muslims...


You Said:

In order to misappropriate the grounds of the Al-Aqsa mosque, Zionists nowadays tend to exaggerate the dimensions of the first (and second) temples with the help of Computer-Aided Design by making a sketch of the temple bigger than the old walled city of Jerusalem! What they do not acknowledge is that the temple is just where, according to Jewish belief, God had showed a Prophet David a golden ladder ascending into heaven, where many centuries later, the Muslims had cleaned the place from Christian filth and given it back to the Jews. How many times can Jews be humiliated and still continue to lie?



When you use inflammatory comments about almost everyone, I think people can understand the confusion when you refer to filth as either a noun or an adjective (see Nazi research centre).

You have a nasty habit of putting words in my mouth .


It's easy to put words in someone's mouth when most of the words are coming out of your ass.

I also note that you have deliberately added typos to many of the quotes from my earlier writing to possibly make my writing look bad . If anyone cares they can at least run over my own writing to ensure that it was typo free...



If I wanted to deliberately add typos in your writing, I would. But thankfully, I don't need to as they're already there. And they're not typos of syntax (you have to admit, the whole "center" thing was asking for it) but errors of meaning. That is, your errors obfuscate the ethics of your writing. To blame me, without cause or example, for your fuck-ups is really awesome. Go you!

Also, best of luck with you and yours. smile

J24U

J24U

Danvers, MA
February 2006

APR 15, 2006 04:56 PM

KikiBH said:
Seriously... What's the deal? He's the very first person I've ever flagged on ths site, and I've been here for about 16 months!



I'm convinced he's being kept around for entertainment purposes.

Attack_Macaque

Attack_Macaque

Mesquite, TX
September 2004

APR 15, 2006 05:34 PM

KikiBH said:

Dove said:
i'm sure he's been flagged about a hojillion times by now. maybe god IS on his side! eeek



Seriously... What's the deal? He's the very first person I've ever flagged on ths site, and I've been here for about 16 months!


Dunno, but I flagged him too - also my first flag. There is a strong enough case to be made for the plight of the Palestinians without having to resort to holocaust denial, historical revisionism and ethnic scapegoating.

Survivor8403

Survivor8403

United Kingdom
January 2006

APR 16, 2006 02:12 AM



?I note that you have carefully quoted and pointed out typos in my earlier piece. Your comments have been the source of mirth to my detractors here. You will also note that I have answered my Jewish friend’s piece which undoubtedly contains many more typos in every sentence.



For the Lead Editor Christopher: The question mark that you see at the beginning of the quoted sentence was not in my original piece. May be you put it there unintentionally . May be you put it there deliberately . I have no issue with question (or exclamation !!!!) marks . It is you who keeps going on about them. Please refer to your own writing above.
. Again in your latest piece you go on about your confusion between nouns and adjectives . I am forced to apologise at this pont if you are still confused. No confusion was intended--at least not the kind implied by you.

I do realise that our exchange has given the opportunity for "literates" to point out to me, that when messages here are edited one should see below for the edited mark:

eeek

or like this

blackeyed

or like this

mad

As if I did not know that after years of writing political blogs. Moreover, I am told that my first post "still" contains typos ...

Amongst other comments worthy of being dignified with a reply is one from Hadees:





wikipedia on there is an article on Child suicide bomber which lists alot of incidents where younger children were caught with explosives and explosive belts.



I know a number of children were "caught" , stripped naked and photographed on Israeli checkpoints and fitted with suicide belts---but that is just the Israeli army's justification for murdering minors during their incursions into the Palestinin territory. If what the Israelis are saying about child suicide-bombers is true why did not any of the Palestinian children ever execute a successful bombing? And I will have to check your claim about the 16-year old , but that still does not make him a minor.

I have also noted a number of "literates" refuting my version of history although they are yet to come up with their own...

I know that suicide-girls with its associations with web-sites like free Arab forum and jihadwatch has no sympathy with my cause. It is therefore almost hilarious to see my detractors begging for me to be disciplined. biggrin

When I live in the blogosphere, I always attempt to answer facts with facts. I do not enjoy trading insults if I can avoid it. When I encounter "confused" people like the Lead editor like Christopher I even apologise if an apology can help . I do not score cheap points on question marks, exclamation marks or typos or "English as a Second Language" either.

None here have been able to refute my facts. Not a single one of my facts. Many have questioned my version of history without providing one of their own. I will not repeat what I think of them or what they think of me. I am just glad I have been given the opportunity to an easy victory on this very friendly forum.
Feel free to tell me otherwise if you disagree.

One last word.
Semites are descendants of the marriage of Sam & Sedeqetalbab. That includes many of the offspring of Noah and all the children of Abraham. How is it then that Ashkenazi ( whose own semitic origins are dubious) have "copyrighted" the term for their use and abuse?


[Edited on Apr 16, 2006 11:08AM]

Iseult

Iseult

United Kingdom
September 2005

APR 16, 2006 03:22 AM

Survivor8403, you have not been badly received on this forum because of your beliefs. Indeed yours would have made for an interesting and civilised debate had you not been spewing insults from your very first post. It is your offensive attitude to those who disagree with you that has prevented anyone from taking you or your arguments seriously; after all, nobody wants to engage in a discussion if the other party is being a monumental jackass.

We are (for the most part) a friendly community, believe it or not; which encompasses a broad spectrum of beliefs and knowledge. As such, we're used to debates and arguments on these boards and usually such discussions develop in to something interesting and eye-opening for all people concerned. However, that will never happen if you call your advocates half-literates and tarts from the get-go. You are fortunate that Christopher has taken you seriously enough to reply to your posts because the rest of us, who in normal circumstances would be happy to discuss your views with you are too busy laughing at your appalling attitude. Insults are the indication of a weak argument, of course; which would lead people to believe that yours doesn't hold much weight in the first place.

You, Sir have nobody to blame for the lack of intelligent discourse but yourself. If you really want a civilised discussion, you must first act in a civilised manner and then I'm sure we will start to take you seriously. If not, get used to the flames and jokes, because they will continue and the real issues will be overlooked.

Welcome to SG.

[Edited on Apr 16, 2006 by Lissom]

Kristie

Kristie

Chicago, IL
December 2004

APR 16, 2006 07:06 AM

^ Mmm hmm. I couldn't have said it better, and I wholeheartedly agree.



Also, Lissom, I think I love you.

[Edited on Apr 16, 2006 by KikiBH]

sickboyedd

sickboyedd

United Kingdom
January 2004

APR 16, 2006 09:44 AM




None here have been able to refute my facts



Well, actually, the few "facts" you give out were countered quite eloquently. The other stuff you said comprised of

1. Personal Experience e.g. "I saw x, y or z committed by the Israelis" with no actual evidence.. The believeability of the statement therefore rests on other peoples appraisal of your character. Oh dear.
2. Lies. e.g. "I didn't commit all those typos".
3. Off-topic ideas that are mainly opinion and again do not provide us with any real evidence.

If you want to try and "win" this "argument", then some sources for your information would be nice.

For example, you refer to the "dubious" origins of the Ashkenazi, yet a very simple look at the literature turns up interesting papers to shed some light on their origins:

Doron M. Behar,*, Mark G. Thomas,et al. (2003). Multiple Origins of Ashkenazi Levites: Y Chromosome Evidence for both Near Eastern and European Ancestries. American Journal of Human Genetics 73: pp768-779.


Christopher

Christopher

Portland, OR
November 2002

APR 16, 2006 03:23 PM

Survivor8403 said:



?I note that you have carefully quoted and pointed out typos in my earlier piece. Your comments have been the source of mirth to my detractors here. You will also note that I have answered my Jewish friend’s piece which undoubtedly contains many more typos in every sentence.



For the Lead Editor Christopher: The question mark that you see at the beginning of the quoted sentence was not in my original piece. May be you put it there unintentionally . May be you put it there deliberately . I have no issue with question (or exclamation !!!!) marks . It is you who keeps going on about them. Please refer to your own writing above.
. Again in your latest piece you go on about your confusion between nouns and adjectives . I am forced to apologise at this pont if you are still confused. No confusion was intended--at least not the kind implied by you.

I do realise that our exchange has given the opportunity for "literates" to point out to me, that when messages here are edited one should see below for the edited mark:

eeek

or like this

blackeyed

or like this

mad

The "?" is probably from the previous sentence where there was a space between the end of the sentence and end punctuation—don't hit space before the end punctuation.

For instance, not this .
But this.


This is were the confusion is. Among other things.

[Edited on Apr 16, 2006 by Christopher]

Chitin

Chitin

New York, NY
December 2004

APR 16, 2006 03:42 PM

Christopher said:

Survivor8403 said:



?I note that you have carefully quoted and pointed out typos in my earlier piece. Your comments have been the source of mirth to my detractors here. You will also note that I have answered my Jewish friend’s piece which undoubtedly contains many more typos in every sentence.



For the Lead Editor Christopher: The question mark that you see at the beginning of the quoted sentence was not in my original piece. May be you put it there unintentionally . May be you put it there deliberately . I have no issue with question (or exclamation !!!!) marks . It is you who keeps going on about them. Please refer to your own writing above.
. Again in your latest piece you go on about your confusion between nouns and adjectives . I am forced to apologise at this pont if you are still confused. No confusion was intended--at least not the kind implied by you.

I do realise that our exchange has given the opportunity for "literates" to point out to me, that when messages here are edited one should see below for the edited mark:

eeek

or like this

blackeyed

or like this

mad

The "?" is probably from the previous sentence where there was a space. At the end of the sentence, you don't hit space before the end punctuation.

For instance, not this .
But this.


This is were the confusion is. Among other things.

[Edited on Apr 16, 2006 by Christopher]


Also amusing is that he puts a punctuation mark at the beginning of a sentence WHILE COMPLAINING THAT YOU EDITED HIS WRITING TO DO THE SAME THING. surreal

Iseult

Iseult

United Kingdom
September 2005

APR 16, 2006 05:29 PM

KikiBH said:
^ Mmm hmm. I couldn't have said it better, and I wholeheartedly agree.



Also, Lissom, I think I love you.

[Edited on Apr 16, 2006 by KikiBH]


kiss

hadees

hadees

Austin, TX
December 2003

APR 16, 2006 10:23 PM

about time he got zotted.

zredband

zredband

Fort Lauderdale, FL
January 2004

APR 17, 2006 01:40 AM

Bummer, now we won’t have Survivor8403 to kick around any more. So it goes.

A few parting shots:

The problem with a bigot is that they won’t let facts get in the way of their hatred. They could assert that the world was flat and you couldn’t prove otherwise to them. They are beyond the reach of logic. This is called “cognitive dissidence”, which is amusing coming from someone who accuses us of “denial” and “rationalization”.

By the way, about Sheikh Yassin’s “assassination”, we where not the ones that declared jihad, a funny thing happens when you wage a war, you kill us and we get to kill you back, that’s the way it works- suck it up and drive on.

I did 6 years in the U.S. Army; I have a pretty good understanding of war- IT SUCKS!

I used to think it was good, now I understand that there are no winners in war, only losers. Winning is an illusion, the only thing gained is land for a state; the land will always be there, states come and go. What is lost is lost is far more precious and irreplaceable- Lives, the lives of loved ones: mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, husbands, wives and etc… all of this for WHAT? Land? The glory of God-Allah-Yahweh what ever you want to call him? I personally can’t understand how anyone who believes in a loving god, who created everything and everyone, could think that it is a good and holy thing to kill other people, the very people that god himself created; who are you to decide that they are nonbelievers that must be punished? If there is a God, I say we leave those judgments up to him. But people like you would sooner grow another head then grow up and develop a continence.

The Palestinians have never failed to pass on a peaceful resolution, at the summit meeting with Carter, Israel was prepared to give in to more then 90% to the Palestinian demands, Arafat said “no deal”, seems they didn’t really want peace after all. Sadly, I can only conclude that the hostilities are never going to end. It’s a shame that two peoples with so much in common and so much to offer each other can’t get along. Again, so it goes.

Pease be with you

sickboyedd

sickboyedd

United Kingdom
January 2004

APR 17, 2006 03:06 AM

Damn, he'd almost talked me around as well. Maybe there *IS* a secret nazi moonbase and the british royal family *are* lizards. Now I'll never know "the truth". You bunch of perverts and "half-literates" won'''''t be able to tell me! LOL!

!Gahh..tacking ovber my brain LOL LOL LOL!!


sickboyedd

sickboyedd

United Kingdom
January 2004

APR 17, 2006 03:08 AM

Sorry about that, had a bit of a funny turn....

Iseult

Iseult

United Kingdom
September 2005

APR 17, 2006 04:05 AM

Bye bye troll.

DeathByOpus

DeathByOpus

Saint Louis, MO
March 2006

APR 17, 2006 05:16 AM

dam

J24U

J24U

Danvers, MA
February 2006

APR 17, 2006 06:13 AM

I'll miss disliking him. As long as he was there spouting bigoted nonsense, I didn't have to dislike anyone else I came across in the day, he could absorb all my ire.

hadees

hadees

Austin, TX
December 2003

APR 17, 2006 10:34 AM

I wonder if that is a record, he only had 14 comments before getting zotted and joined in Jan 06.

Chitin

Chitin

New York, NY
December 2004

APR 18, 2006 05:17 PM

Oh good, the joke was getting old.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next