NEWS: Nazi Mobile Gas Chamber to Have Been Used in

Seriously... What's the deal? He's the very first person I've ever flagged on ths site, and I've been here for about 16 months!

how funny is that!! of like his 9 comments, 5 are his

You Said:

When you use inflammatory comments about almost everyone, I think people can understand the confusion when you refer to filth as either a noun or an adjective (see Nazi research centre).

It's easy to put words in someone's mouth when most of the words are coming out of your ass.

If I wanted to deliberately add typos in your writing, I would. But thankfully, I don't need to as they're already there. And they're not typos of syntax (you have to admit, the whole "center" thing was asking for it) but errors of meaning. That is, your errors obfuscate the ethics of your writing. To blame me, without cause or example, for your fuck-ups is really awesome. Go you!

Also, best of luck with you and yours.

I'm convinced he's being kept around for entertainment purposes.

Dunno, but I flagged him too - also my first flag. There is a strong enough case to be made for the plight of the Palestinians without having to resort to holocaust denial, historical revisionism and ethnic scapegoating.

For the Lead Editor Christopher: The question mark that you see at the beginning of the quoted sentence was not in my original piece. May be you put it there unintentionally . May be you put it there deliberately . I have no issue with question (or exclamation !!!!) marks . It is you who keeps going on about them. Please refer to your own writing above.
. Again in your latest piece you go on about your confusion between nouns and adjectives . I am forced to apologise at this pont if you are still confused. No confusion was intended--at least not the kind implied by you.

I do realise that our exchange has given the opportunity for "literates" to point out to me, that when messages here are edited one should see below for the edited mark:



or like this



or like this



As if I did not know that after years of writing political blogs. Moreover, I am told that my first post "still" contains typos ...

Amongst other comments worthy of being dignified with a reply is one from Hadees:

I know a number of children were "caught" , stripped naked and photographed on Israeli checkpoints and fitted with suicide belts---but that is just the Israeli army's justification for murdering minors during their incursions into the Palestinin territory. If what the Israelis are saying about child suicide-bombers is true why did not any of the Palestinian children ever execute a successful bombing? And I will have to check your claim about the 16-year old , but that still does not make him a minor.

I have also noted a number of "literates" refuting my version of history although they are yet to come up with their own...

I know that suicide-girls with its associations with web-sites like free Arab forum and jihadwatch has no sympathy with my cause. It is therefore almost hilarious to see my detractors begging for me to be disciplined.

When I live in the blogosphere, I always attempt to answer facts with facts. I do not enjoy trading insults if I can avoid it. When I encounter "confused" people like the Lead editor like Christopher I even apologise if an apology can help . I do not score cheap points on question marks, exclamation marks or typos or "English as a Second Language" either.

None here have been able to refute my facts. Not a single one of my facts. Many have questioned my version of history without providing one of their own. I will not repeat what I think of them or what they think of me. I am just glad I have been given the opportunity to an easy victory on this very friendly forum.
Feel free to tell me otherwise if you disagree.

One last word.
Semites are descendants of the marriage of Sam & Sedeqetalbab. That includes many of the offspring of Noah and all the children of Abraham. How is it then that Ashkenazi ( whose own semitic origins are dubious) have "copyrighted" the term for their use and abuse?


[Edited on Apr 16, 2006 11:08AM]

Survivor8403, you have not been badly received on this forum because of your beliefs. Indeed yours would have made for an interesting and civilised debate had you not been spewing insults from your very first post. It is your offensive attitude to those who disagree with you that has prevented anyone from taking you or your arguments seriously; after all, nobody wants to engage in a discussion if the other party is being a monumental jackass.

We are (for the most part) a friendly community, believe it or not; which encompasses a broad spectrum of beliefs and knowledge. As such, we're used to debates and arguments on these boards and usually such discussions develop in to something interesting and eye-opening for all people concerned. However, that will never happen if you call your advocates half-literates and tarts from the get-go. You are fortunate that Christopher has taken you seriously enough to reply to your posts because the rest of us, who in normal circumstances would be happy to discuss your views with you are too busy laughing at your appalling attitude. Insults are the indication of a weak argument, of course; which would lead people to believe that yours doesn't hold much weight in the first place.

You, Sir have nobody to blame for the lack of intelligent discourse but yourself. If you really want a civilised discussion, you must first act in a civilised manner and then I'm sure we will start to take you seriously. If not, get used to the flames and jokes, because they will continue and the real issues will be overlooked.

Welcome to SG.

[Edited on Apr 16, 2006 by Lissom]

^ Mmm hmm. I couldn't have said it better, and I wholeheartedly agree.



Also, Lissom, I think I love you.

[Edited on Apr 16, 2006 by KikiBH]

Well, actually, the few "facts" you give out were countered quite eloquently. The other stuff you said comprised of

1. Personal Experience e.g. "I saw x, y or z committed by the Israelis" with no actual evidence.. The believeability of the statement therefore rests on other peoples appraisal of your character. Oh dear.
2. Lies. e.g. "I didn't commit all those typos".
3. Off-topic ideas that are mainly opinion and again do not provide us with any real evidence.

If you want to try and "win" this "argument", then some sources for your information would be nice.

For example, you refer to the "dubious" origins of the Ashkenazi, yet a very simple look at the literature turns up interesting papers to shed some light on their origins:

Doron M. Behar,*, Mark G. Thomas,et al. (2003). Multiple Origins of Ashkenazi Levites: Y Chromosome Evidence for both Near Eastern and European Ancestries. American Journal of Human Genetics 73: pp768-779.

The "?" is probably from the previous sentence where there was a space between the end of the sentence and end punctuation—don't hit space before the end punctuation.

For instance, not this .
But this.


This is were the confusion is. Among other things.

[Edited on Apr 16, 2006 by Christopher]

Also amusing is that he puts a punctuation mark at the beginning of a sentence WHILE COMPLAINING THAT YOU EDITED HIS WRITING TO DO THE SAME THING.

about time he got zotted.

Bummer, now we won’t have Survivor8403 to kick around any more. So it goes.

A few parting shots:

The problem with a bigot is that they won’t let facts get in the way of their hatred. They could assert that the world was flat and you couldn’t prove otherwise to them. They are beyond the reach of logic. This is called “cognitive dissidence”, which is amusing coming from someone who accuses us of “denial” and “rationalization”.

By the way, about Sheikh Yassin’s “assassination”, we where not the ones that declared jihad, a funny thing happens when you wage a war, you kill us and we get to kill you back, that’s the way it works- suck it up and drive on.

I did 6 years in the U.S. Army; I have a pretty good understanding of war- IT SUCKS!

I used to think it was good, now I understand that there are no winners in war, only losers. Winning is an illusion, the only thing gained is land for a state; the land will always be there, states come and go. What is lost is lost is far more precious and irreplaceable- Lives, the lives of loved ones: mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, husbands, wives and etc… all of this for WHAT? Land? The glory of God-Allah-Yahweh what ever you want to call him? I personally can’t understand how anyone who believes in a loving god, who created everything and everyone, could think that it is a good and holy thing to kill other people, the very people that god himself created; who are you to decide that they are nonbelievers that must be punished? If there is a God, I say we leave those judgments up to him. But people like you would sooner grow another head then grow up and develop a continence.

The Palestinians have never failed to pass on a peaceful resolution, at the summit meeting with Carter, Israel was prepared to give in to more then 90% to the Palestinian demands, Arafat said “no deal”, seems they didn’t really want peace after all. Sadly, I can only conclude that the hostilities are never going to end. It’s a shame that two peoples with so much in common and so much to offer each other can’t get along. Again, so it goes.

Pease be with you

Damn, he'd almost talked me around as well. Maybe there *IS* a secret nazi moonbase and the british royal family *are* lizards. Now I'll never know "the truth". You bunch of perverts and "half-literates" won'''''t be able to tell me! LOL!

!Gahh..tacking ovber my brain LOL LOL LOL!!

Sorry about that, had a bit of a funny turn....

Bye bye troll.

dam

I'll miss disliking him. As long as he was there spouting bigoted nonsense, I didn't have to dislike anyone else I came across in the day, he could absorb all my ire.

I wonder if that is a record, he only had 14 comments before getting zotted and joined in Jan 06.

Oh good, the joke was getting old.