Lifestyle

TOPICS:

4/11/06

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

217 | 218 | 219

 ... 944

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

susannah_breslin

susannah_breslin

I'm lost
June 2005

APR 07, 2006 10:14 AM

At a recent conference focusing on the future of sex held in Santa Fe, New Mexico, sex researchers expressed concern the increasingly intertwined relationship between sex and technology could lead to a so-called "de-interaction of sex." Kinsey Institute director Julia Heiman believes people will move towards virtual relationships, rather than real ones, with disconcerting consequences in the bedroom.

"The de-interaction of sex is something I worry about," said Julia Heiman, director of the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction.

"If we go too much in the direction of virtual sex, what's left out? How you get along in a personal sphere is getting short shrift," Heiman said in a conference call with reporters.

While cyber-sex fueled by drugs such as Viagra might be tempting, it is "built for disappointment" because real life can seldom compete with fantasies, panelists said.

"The breakneck speed of technology development allows one to create one's own erotic ideal and a multi-sensory experience of virtual sex," said Heiman.

"If young people are learning in this fashion, what about the very personal aspect of sex in which you have to interact with the other person?"

A compounding factor will likely be pharmaceutical companies eagerly expanding the array of drugs that enhance sexual activity, Heiman said.

Erection-stimulating drugs such as Viagra could exacerbate the "individualization" of sex, said professor John Gagnon of the State University of New York at Stony Brook.

milos_silo

milos_silo

Saint Peters, MO
January 2006

APR 07, 2006 02:06 PM

sex, I don't remember sex. must've been sick in 5th grade when they went over that one...

talisman

talisman

Minneapolis, MN
November 2004

APR 07, 2006 02:08 PM

hmmm...wonder if journalism goes to shit too if reliance on "conference call" interviews continues apace...

FrankMask

FrankMask

Saint Paul, MN
June 2003

APR 07, 2006 02:10 PM

? Qua ?

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

APR 07, 2006 02:13 PM

Uh...there's no virtual sex yet. Sure, if you get holodeck style technology, or maybe virtual interaction environments like Richard K. Morgan describes in his Kovacs books, then it might mostly replace regular sexual interaction. More room to act out fantasies, fewer consequences.

But we're nowhere near there. Right now, I guess you can do textsex. And that's kind of fun, but I can tell you right here and now that I would trade any and all of it for real sex in a heartbeat.

wendoo

wendoo

United Kingdom
February 2006

APR 07, 2006 02:13 PM

I think Miss Heiman is worrying unnecessarily. Who would want to give up the skin-to-skin interaction, catching eachothers eyes, hearing their noises and cuddling afterwards, not me!

James_

James_

United Kingdom
March 2003

APR 07, 2006 02:24 PM

The end of sex means the end of children, and that can only be a good thing. I fucking hate brats.

seanvegas

seanvegas

Lincoln, NE
December 2004

APR 07, 2006 02:26 PM

I don't thing "real" sex will ever die out. That is like saying the need to drink water will die out! Idiots!

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

APR 07, 2006 02:27 PM

While cyber-sex fueled by drugs such as Viagra might be tempting, it is "built for disappointment" because real life can seldom compete with fantasies, panelists said.


Here's how to read this paragraph:

These panelists have really boring sex lives.

thorr74

thorr74

Sylvan Lake, AB
December 2004

APR 07, 2006 02:31 PM

Haven't you people seen Demolition Man!!!!
Its closer than you think.....

rdpixie

rdpixie

United Kingdom
January 2006

APR 07, 2006 02:34 PM

Subrosa said:

While cyber-sex fueled by drugs such as Viagra might be tempting, it is "built for disappointment" because real life can seldom compete with fantasies, panelists said.


Here's how to read this paragraph:

These panelists have really boring sex lives.



biggrin biggrin biggrin

I will NEVER give up on real sex! Its way too good! love

Buster_Bluth

Buster_Bluth

Los Angeles, CA
January 2004

APR 07, 2006 02:36 PM

Nine posts in and no one, absolutely no one has commented on the fact that a sex researcher is named "Heiman?" That's it, I'm outta here.

decedent

decedent

Boston, MA
December 2003

APR 07, 2006 02:42 PM

one word: teledildonics

rdpixie

rdpixie

United Kingdom
January 2006

APR 07, 2006 02:45 PM

Buster_Bluth said:
Nine posts in and no one, absolutely no one has commented on the fact that a sex researcher is named "Heiman?" That's it, I'm outta here.



surreal I didn't even notice that! Hehe! biggrin

TobasElly

TobasElly

Philadelphia, PA
January 2004

APR 07, 2006 02:58 PM

Am I the only one who immediately thinks of Barbarella? Especially with the sex drugs.

catatac

catatac

San Diego, CA
June 2005

APR 07, 2006 03:24 PM

I'd be totally in favor of a virtual relationship and "virtual sex" over a real relationship with real sex. "real life can seldom compete with fantasies", huh? DUH! Real life sucks. Relationships are hard and unpleasant much of the time. Why wouldn't I want a relationship I can fold up and store? (meant figuratively.)
Besides, let people become disinterested in "real" sex, and maybe we'd see a dip in population. I'm all for it, fuck those sexperts.

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

APR 07, 2006 03:28 PM

Also, I think there's the implication that we would use the technology to go and fuck made up fantasy people, but I think it's just as likely, if not more so, that most people would use it to have wild virtual sex online with other people.

And maybe it'll help do away with some of the crimes committed by people like the Cannibal of Rothenburg.

apesamongus

apesamongus

Atlanta, GA
July 2002

APR 07, 2006 03:30 PM

I'm confused as yto how viagra helps to individualize sex. I'd think that if you can't get it up, staring at a screen and fantasizing would be more common, and the drug would help get back into the cooperative sex side of things.

Vampirate

Vampirate

Durham, NC
October 2004

APR 07, 2006 03:32 PM

Yeah, honestly, most of the time, real sex just isn't worth the hassle of dealing with other people. So, yeah, hooray for teh cyb0r.

DeathByOpus

DeathByOpus

Saint Louis, MO
March 2006

APR 07, 2006 03:39 PM

thats different

JuliusChurch

JuliusChurch

Ashland, PA
November 2005

APR 07, 2006 03:40 PM

Women are too emotionally turbulent and confusing, like an airplane that's constantly threatening to spin out of control.

zoton

zoton

Kuwait
November 2005

APR 07, 2006 03:44 PM

so long as I'm having fun I really don't care what happens to the state of sex.

MarginWalker2002

MarginWalker2002

San Diego, CA
April 2004

APR 07, 2006 04:12 PM



While cyber-sex fueled by drugs such as Viagra might be tempting



This bothers me... Has someone been RAMming their hard drive into someone else's main frame??

Paul9000

Paul9000

Monterey, CA
November 2004

APR 07, 2006 04:36 PM

OneBadDude said:
Women are too emotionally turbulent and confusing, like an airplane that's constantly threatening to spin out of control.


I thought is was me all along. Now I know that's how God built them.

starblood

starblood

Horsham, PA
March 2006

APR 07, 2006 04:41 PM

James_ said:
The end of sex means the end of children, and that can only be a good thing. I fucking hate brats.



Hear, hear.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next