Stephen King's new novel, Cell will be released tomorrow, and the New York Times has a review. In Cell, cellphones turn human beings into zombies on the warpath as citizens without cellphones, "Normies," fight for their lives. As part of the book's promotional campaign, fans can download Cellringtones by King: "Beware, the next call you take may be your last" or "It's OK, it's a 'Normie' calling."
"Cell" begins with a big, graphic jolt. On a pleasant October afternoon in downtown Boston (beware any scene featuring an innocent ice cream truck), everything suddenly goes crazy. People attack strangers, break things and speak in wild gibberish, all as a consequence of the brain zapping that the book calls The Pulse. It has been delivered via cellphone. Only the Luddites and phone-phobes are safe. So far, so good - although it would have been better had Mr. King not agreed to promote "Cell" with cellphone ring tones being sold by his publisher.
Anyone who uses a cellphone (Mr. King does not) has been zombified: in a book dedicated to two pioneers in this thematic area, Richard Matheson and George Romero, Mr. King creates a "Night of the Living Dead" scenario with a technological twist. "Except these people aren't dead," explains a still-sentient Boston police officer. "Unless we help them, that is."
Mr. King spends part of "Cell" contemplating the essential darkness of human nature. Stripped of social constraints, the Pulse people create a Hieronymous Bosch tableau of hellish depravity. They can be found reeling, staggering, biting their own mothers or fighting over Twinkies.
On one hand, that premise sounds absolutely stupid. On the other, it makes prefect sense, as I'm certain zombies cannot drive, and have horrid table manners at a restaurant.
I'm going to write a novel about how people who use the motorized printing press all of a sudden turn into catatonics, so self important schlock novelists can't publish and mass distribute their "insightful" anti-technology nonsense.
i read the first two chapters already and it's actually pure King...reminiscent of the Castle Rock books in tone and visuals...i for one am looking forward to it and i'm sure that i'll get mocked for that, but who cares? i just want to read some good and bloody writing, which is damn hard to find now
LokisChild said:
why do you all hate King so? if you don't like his writing, don't read it...you don't need to trash him just because you think he's silly....
I don't. You just have to admit the concept for this one is more than a bit cheesy/played out.
LokisChild said:
why do you all hate King so? if you don't like his writing, don't read it...you don't need to trash him just because you think he's silly....
Early-mid King is pretty good, and probably underrated, but lately he's pretty bad. And a forum about his new book is the perfect place to criticise him.
Also, someone who writes a book where cell phones turn people into zombies probably has a pretty good sense of humor about themselves...so relax.
LokisChild said:
why do you all hate King so? if you don't like his writing, don't read it...you don't need to trash him just because you think he's silly....
I don't. You just have to admit the concept for this one is more than a bit cheesy/played out.
i read a book for the story, the entire story, character development that moves the plot along for example, and King is very effective at this, so when i find several other authors who have done the same with this kind of story line, then yes, i will say it is played out...or if i read the book and find it is a copy of every zombie book/movie, then i will say it is played out, but until you read the story, how do you know if it's cheesy?
I think this article makes the book sound worse than it probably is. It's hard to rationally condense some things. I mean, explain LOTR in 3 paragraphs and make it not sound odd.
...although the story would likely be better using tvs.
LokisChild said:
why do you all hate King so? if you don't like his writing, don't read it...you don't need to trash him just because you think he's silly....
Early-mid King is pretty good, and probably underrated, but lately he's pretty bad. And a forum about his new book is the perfect place to criticise him.
Also, someone who writes a book where cell phones turn people into zombies probably has a pretty good sense of humor about themselves...so relax.
but have you actually read this book yet? i'm venturing a guess that you haven't, so how do you know what this book will be like....
and i admit that my previous comment read like i was all sorts of uptight about this, but i don't mean to be...i understand that it's everyone's right to criticize who they want, and i respect that, i also criticize writers that i don't like, but i generally wait until i've had a chance to actually read what i'm going to make fun of
LokisChild said:
why do you all hate King so? if you don't like his writing, don't read it...you don't need to trash him just because you think he's silly....
Early-mid King is pretty good, and probably underrated, but lately he's pretty bad. And a forum about his new book is the perfect place to criticise him.
Also, someone who writes a book where cell phones turn people into zombies probably has a pretty good sense of humor about themselves...so relax.
but have you actually read this book yet? i'm venturing a guess that you haven't, so how do you know what this book will be like....
No, and no one is criticising the BOOK, we're criticising the plot. And we're just having fun with it, becuase its, um, sort of (read: very) silly. Have you read the book yet? If not, why are you defending it?
LokisChild said:
why do you all hate King so? if you don't like his writing, don't read it...you don't need to trash him just because you think he's silly....
Early-mid King is pretty good, and probably underrated, but lately he's pretty bad. And a forum about his new book is the perfect place to criticise him.
Also, someone who writes a book where cell phones turn people into zombies probably has a pretty good sense of humor about themselves...so relax.
but have you actually read this book yet? i'm venturing a guess that you haven't, so how do you know what this book will be like....
No, and no one is criticising the BOOK, we're criticising the plot. And we're just having fun with it, becuase its, um, sort of (read: very) silly. Have you read the book yet? If not, why are you defending it?
Probably because a plot that revolves around cellphone zombies is more like a call to arms than anything else.
PointBlank said:
No, and no one is criticising the BOOK, we're criticising the plot. And we're just having fun with it, becuase its, um, sort of (read: very) silly. Have you read the book yet? If not, why are you defending it?
LokisChild said:
i read the first two chapters already and it's actually pure King...reminiscent of the Castle Rock books in tone and visuals...i for one am looking forward to it
Incidentally, I've heard King dedicated this book to George Romero and Richard Matheson, so if it's derivative it's at least purposeful and/or acknowledged up front.
Sounds good to me. First King book I have been looking forward to in years. Probably because I actually like the cheezey derivitive genre that it is a part of. I'm especialy fond of James Herbert's The Fog and the short story by Alice Sheldon, The Screwfly Solution. Hopfully the imagery in this will be equally disturbing.
susannah_breslin
I'm lost
June 2005
JAN 23, 2006 09:25 AM