Lifestyle

TOPICS:

1/12/06
1/10/06

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

188 | 189 | 190

 ... 886

Next

mat8drb

mat8drb

United Kingdom
October 2004

JAN 08, 2006 09:20 AM

More Freedom of Information shenanigans in the UK have revealed what the residents of Whitehall were really doing during the 1980s: trying to save the Loch Ness Monster.



Newly released files show that officials working under the Thatcher government feared that there would be nothing to prevent poachers and trophy hunters killing it, were Nessie to emerge from the depths.



The documents, released under the Freedom of Information Act, show a flurry of consultations, meetings and briefings between the Scottish Office and the Foreign Office. Eventually it was decided that no new act of parliament was needed and that the 1981 Wildlife and Countryside Act made it an offence for anyone to snare, shoot or blow up Nessie with explosives.



Officials concluded: "The legislative framework to protect the monster is available, provided she (or he) is identified by scientists whose reputation will carry weight with the British Museum." The files also show that a decade earlier, interest in the monster had reached ministerial level. Willie Ross, the Scottish secretary, had considered the issue of its existence after the publication of pictures said to show Nessie.





And it would have stayed quiet like that until Swedish government officials made an enquiry about their own Storsjö monster, said to reside in Lake Storsjön. They wanted to know if any special protection existed for Nessie, in order to put their own monster under protection, and sent a letter to the British Embassy in August 2005. The Swedish did put their monster under protection from 1986 until November 2005, when it was challenged.



Hundreds of people claim to have spotted a large serpent-like creature in Lake Storsjon in the north-western province of Jamtland, and in 1986 the regional council put it on a list of endangered animals.



The so-called Storsjo monster was first mentioned in print in 1635. Some people describe the creature as a snakelike animal with a dog's head and fins on its neck. But no clear image of it has been captured on camera.



But a government watchdog challenged the decision, saying such protection was hardly necessary for a creature whose existence has not been proven





Of course, Nessie was not put any kind of protection and was eventually removed from Scotland by a Montgomery Burns in 1999. Clearly J B Barty, a Scottish Civil servant who wrote in 1985 that "The protection of this putative denizen of the deep deserves serious consideration" was upset.

steve626

steve626

Tarentum, PA
February 2005

JAN 08, 2006 10:54 AM


eventually removed from Scotland by a Montgomery Burns in 1999



Excellent Smithers, my very own monster...

Blyddyn

Blyddyn

Germany
June 2005

JAN 08, 2006 10:57 AM

Doh !

BurningKrome

BurningKrome

San Jose, CA
April 2005

JAN 08, 2006 05:05 PM

Dunno...wasn't it the Orangutan which was not officially documented till the late 1920's (or was it the Gorillalala?)

crispy

crispy

NEWSWIRE

Philadelphia, PA

JAN 08, 2006 05:07 PM

BurningKrome said:
Dunno...wasn't it the Orangutan which was not officially documented till the late 1920's (or was it the Gorillalala?)


Panda.

frogoth

frogoth

I'm lost
January 2006

JAN 09, 2006 07:18 PM

Come on, if Nessie was real, she would've died long ago, if earliest sightings are to be believed.

So obviously that means that there must be an entire family of the wee tim'rous beasties hiding out in the loch... surreal

BurningKrome

BurningKrome

San Jose, CA
April 2005

JAN 09, 2006 09:01 PM

frogoth said:
Come on, if Nessie was real, she would've died long ago, if earliest sightings are to be believed.

So obviously that means that there must be an entire family of the wee tim'rous beasties hiding out in the loch... surreal


Nessie-babies! Sounds like a good pet for Feral Cheryl!